Head-to-head Updated

Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Michelin Energy Saver — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 33 + 1 road tests and 21,726 + 137 owner reviews. How we score

CrossClimate 2 is ahead, 87–70

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin CrossClimate 2
Tire AMichelin

CrossClimate 2

All Season

± 4

Tests 87 · 33 tests Owners 87 · 21,726 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 35 in 2023 All Season Tyre 35 Set Shootout (dry braking)

“CrossClimate2 in. Alenza Run Flats out. Swapped the Alenza run flats for CrossClimate2 all-weather tires. Sharper handling. Better ride comfort. Very quiet after an initial break-in period. Just make sure the tire pressure is as recommended on the door sill sticker, shop techs don’t always check. I’m an early adopter of CC2 tires, been using them on my old Jeep since 2022, super durable and perfect for inclement weather, still had some tread remaining at the 60k-mile warranty mark.”

Michelin Energy Saver
Tire BMichelin

Energy Saver

Summer

± 7

Tests 71 · 1 test Owners 69 · 137 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 20 in 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test (wear)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 95

    Dry

    CrossClimate 2 +26
    69
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2Energy Saver
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 31 / 1 tests9971
    Reviews found online8867

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 99.2 + 40% × 88.3 = 95

    Energy Saver: 60% × 70.6 + 40% × 67.1 = 69

  2. 87

    Wet

    CrossClimate 2 +19
    68
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2Energy Saver
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 31 / 1 tests8369
    Reviews found online9267

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 83.1 + 40% × 91.7 = 87

    Energy Saver: 60% × 69.2 + 40% × 66.5 = 68

  3. 90

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2Energy Saver
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 27 / – tests99–
    Reviews found online78–

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 98.6 + 40% × 78.2 = 90

  4. 79

    Comfort

    CrossClimate 2 +11
    68
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2Energy Saver
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / – tests67≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online8667

    CrossClimate 2: 40% × 67.2 + 60% × 86.1 = 79

    Energy Saver: 40% × 68.4 (est.) + 60% × 67.3 = 68

    No road tests of comfort for Energy Saver. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 79

    Noise

    CrossClimate 2 +9
    70
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2Energy Saver
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / 1 tests7772
    Reviews found online83≈ 66 (est.)

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 77.2 + 40% × 82.7 = 79

    Energy Saver: 60% × 72.1 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 70

    No owner ratings of noise for Energy Saver. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 84

    Treadwear

    CrossClimate 2 +10
    74
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2Energy Saver
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / 1 tests8174
    Reviews found online8874

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 81.2 + 40% × 88 = 84

    Energy Saver: 60% × 74.4 + 40% × 74.3 = 74

  7. 82

    Handling (owners)

    CrossClimate 2 +18
    64
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2Energy Saver
    Reviews found online8264
  8. 90

    Efficiency

    CrossClimate 2 +15
    75
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2Energy Saver
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 23 / 1 tests9075
Scores at a glance
Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Michelin Energy Saver: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin CrossClimate 2Michelin Energy Saver
Relative Score 87 70
Dry 95 69
Wet 87 68
Snow 90 –
Comfort 79 68
Noise 79 70
Treadwear 84 74
Handling (owners) 82 64
Efficiency 90 75

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 4

CrossClimate 2

± 7

Energy Saver

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryCrossClimate 2Energy SaverΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 100% #2/16 · 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 92% #13/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 98% #4/5 · 2026 TUV Test Report Goodyear Vector All Season 4 98% #7/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 93% #9/16 · 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 95% #8/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 92% #9/16 · 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 89% #17/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 93% #5/5 · 2026 TUV Test Report Goodyear Vector All Season 4 95% #16/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Noise Noise 98% #9/16 · 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 99% #5/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wear Treadwear 95% #4/16 · 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 95% #2/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 100% #1/5 · 2026 TUV Test Report Goodyear Vector All Season 4 88% #3/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 55% #12/12 · 2024 Minivan / SUV All Season Tyre Test 67% #20/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Total Cost of Ownership Cost #3/15 2024 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test #2/20 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Value Cost 47% #14/15 · 2025 ADAC All Season Tyre Test 69% #11/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall #2/6 2026 Wybór Kierowców Winter Tire Test R17 #5/20 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A CrossClimate 2

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and traction in snow, slush, and winter weather conditions
  • Strong braking and handling performance on dry and wet pavement
  • Long-lasting tread wear and durability

Cons

  • Higher initial purchase price
  • Slight negative impact on fuel economy / EV range for some drivers
  • Potential for increased road noise or harshness as the tires wear down
All owner themes in the CrossClimate 2 review

Tire B Energy Saver

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and long-lasting durability
  • Noticeable improvements in fuel economy and low rolling resistance
  • Low road noise and high levels of driving comfort

Cons

  • Subpar wet-weather grip and traction, especially as the tires age
  • Prone to dry rotting, cracking, and hardening after a few years
  • Poor performance and sliding in cold or winter conditions
All owner themes in the Energy Saver review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Michelin CrossClimate 2

Positive

The community overwhelmingly praises the Michelin CrossClimate 2 for its exceptional snow, ice, and wet-weather traction, often describing it as an ideal all-weather tire. While many drivers report a quiet, comfortable ride and solid durability, some users note potential downsides including reduced fuel or battery efficiency, road noise on certain surfaces, and premium pricing. A few commenters also point out that the tire may be overkill for regions without significant winter weather.

mavericktruckclub.com ·9 upvotes ·2024-08-12

“I replaced the factory Continentals at 9,258 miles at the end of August 2023 with the stock size 225/65R17 Michelin CrossClimate 2's. I waited until the local tire shop had a sale and had these mounted/balanced for under $800. 348 days, 10,004 miles and 4 seasons have passed since then. I spend much of my time around "town" with speed limits under 55 while also having a handful of longer highway drives. These are the closest thing to a "no-compromise" all season tire that I can imagine. They are smooth, quiet and have incredible grip in all weather conditions. Snow, rain, etc. Admittedly, I have not taken my FWD Maverick through any meaningful amount of mud. Maybe there is a tire better suited to this. There are also certainly performance oriented tires that will outperform this tire when it is hot and dry. Last, and certainly not least - there does not seem to be any fuel economy change. I have tracked every tank before and after these tires. Both my best (48.5MPG) and worst (27MPG) full tanks have happened since these were installed. 38.8 overall.”

bobistheoilguy.com ·19 upvotes ·2023-03-10

“I have had the Cross Climate 2 tires on my VW All Track now for about a year and thought I would share some findings about them. 1. They are QUIET on the road. Looking at the tread, you might think they are noisy but they are not! Run as quiet as a normal tire. 2. They give excellent traction and handling on dry, wet and snowy roads. This past winter, I had two occasions to drive on roads covered with 6-10" of snow. Excellent traction. 3. They wear very well! After about 12,000 miles, they hardly show any wear. I expect to get about 50,000-60,000 miles out of these tires. 4. They do exact a mileage penalty. I lost about 2 mpg overall since putting on these tires. However, I do not mind that considering the excellent traction I get from them. 5. They tend to pick up stones in the tread, particularly after the great state of Pennsylvania in its wisdom covers the roads before, during and after a snowstorm with gravel. Overall, this tire is a winner. Handling is excellent as is wear and traction. I would recommend this tire to anyone who wants these features and wants to leave a set of tires on their car year around.”

r/TyreReviews ·35 upvotes ·2026-01-18

“Michelin CrossClimate 2 after 31.000 kilometers I have those Michelin CrossClimate 2 (EU version, made in Spain) for 26 months now and 31.000 kilometers on a heavy Mercedes EQE, the rears are still good but the front tyres are starting to give up on the shoulders. Usual tyre pressure is 2.8 bars, there is still some good tread left on the middle of the tyre. Steering feeling on the snow is also not as good as it used to be. Overall very happy with those tyres, I’ll have to decide between the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 or the CrossClimate 3 Sport (sadly the 3 isn’t available in 255/45 R19) to replace them this year. We have the Pirelli Scorpion SF3 on our second car. Given the car and my usage, I give priority to snow braking, rolling resistance, silence and longevity. I lost a bit of range, comfort and steering engagement when I swapped the factory Bridgestone Turanza T005 for the CrossClimate 2, but in general nothing to call-out.”

Top themes
#Snow and ice traction#Wet handling and hydroplaning#Road noise and comfort#Fuel economy and range#Tread wear and longevity#Premium price point#Directional tread design

Based on 762 community posts

Tire B

Michelin Energy Saver

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin CrossClimate 2 B · Michelin Energy Saver
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available924
Rim diameters15″ – 21″15″ – 16″
Tread depth9 - 10/32″—
UTQG640 B A—
Treadwear warranty60,000 mi—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure50 - 51 psi—
Sizes in common44

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin CrossClimate 2

Michelin Energy Saver

Winner: Michelin CrossClimate 2 — better dry, wet and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 95 vs 69 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 87 vs 68 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 82 vs 64 on handling.

Pick tire A You want lower fuel or energy use

Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 90 vs 75 on efficiency.

Tire A · Michelin CrossClimate 2
Tire B · Michelin Energy Saver

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

CrossClimate 2 or Energy Saver?

Which is better in the wet, CrossClimate 2 or Energy Saver?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 87 vs 68 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, CrossClimate 2 or Energy Saver?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 95 vs 69 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, CrossClimate 2 or Energy Saver?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 79 vs 70 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, CrossClimate 2 or Energy Saver?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 79 vs 68 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, CrossClimate 2 or Energy Saver?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 84 vs 74 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, CrossClimate 2 or Energy Saver?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 90 vs 75 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology