Michelin Pilot Alpin PA3 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Michelin Pilot Alpin PA3 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 32 + 0 road tests and 21,693 + 11 owner reviews. How we score

CrossClimate 2 is ahead, 88–77

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin CrossClimate 2
Tire AMichelin

CrossClimate 2

All Season

± 4

Tests 87 · 32 tests Owners 87 · 21,693 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 35 in 2023 All Season Tyre 35 Set Shootout (dry braking)

“New CrossClimate 2 tires almost stranded my family. Massive efficiency drop on Model Y. Just a heads-up for anyone swapping to Michelin CrossClimate 2s. Put a set on my Model Y about 3 weeks ago from Discount Tire and just did a road trip from Denver to Taos, NM with my wife and two toddlers. We charged up to 90% at the Pueblo Supercharger, and the Tesla app estimated we would arrive in Taos with 15% battery remaining. Well, the new tire efficiency hit is incredibly real. The range dropped so fast that we were tracking to hit 0% and had to make an emergency Type 2 charging stop on the way just to make sure we didn't get stranded with the kids in the car. I’m now seriously thinking about taking advantage of Discount Tire's return policy and going back to the OEM Continental ProContact RX. Has anyone else faced similar problems or massive efficiency drops when switching to the CC2s? Does the range eventually get better after a break-in period, or should I just cut my losses and swap back to the Continentals? I need something reliable for road trips with the family, so I'd love to hear your suggestions and experiences!”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 95

    Dry

    CrossClimate 2 +18
    77
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2Pilot Alpin PA3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 30 / – tests99≈ 74 (est.)
    Reviews found online8883

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 99.3 + 40% × 88.4 = 95

    Pilot Alpin PA3: 60% × 73.9 (est.) + 40% × 82.5 = 77

    No road tests of dry for Pilot Alpin PA3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 86

    Wet

    CrossClimate 2 +5
    81
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2Pilot Alpin PA3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 30 / – tests83≈ 78 (est.)
    Reviews found online9185

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 83.2 + 40% × 91.2 = 86

    Pilot Alpin PA3: 60% × 78.4 (est.) + 40% × 84.8 = 81

    No road tests of wet for Pilot Alpin PA3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 91

    Snow

    CrossClimate 2 +22
    69
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2Pilot Alpin PA3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 26 / – tests99≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7867

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 98.6 + 40% × 78.4 = 91

    Pilot Alpin PA3: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 67.1 = 69

    No road tests of snow for Pilot Alpin PA3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 77

    Comfort

    Pilot Alpin PA3 +1
    78
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2Pilot Alpin PA3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests64≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online8682

    CrossClimate 2: 40% × 64 + 60% × 86.1 = 77

    Pilot Alpin PA3: 40% × 71.3 (est.) + 60% × 81.8 = 78

    No road tests of comfort for Pilot Alpin PA3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 80

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2Pilot Alpin PA3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 19 / – tests78–
    Reviews found online83–

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 77.6 + 40% × 82.7 = 80

  6. 84

    Treadwear

    CrossClimate 2 +8
    76
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2Pilot Alpin PA3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / – tests81≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online8882

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 81.2 + 40% × 88.1 = 84

    Pilot Alpin PA3: 60% × 72 (est.) + 40% × 81.9 = 76

    No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Alpin PA3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 82

    Handling (owners)

    Pilot Alpin PA3 +1
    83
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2Pilot Alpin PA3
    Reviews found online8283
  8. 90

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2Pilot Alpin PA3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 22 / – tests90–
Scores at a glance
Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Michelin Pilot Alpin PA3: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin CrossClimate 2Michelin Pilot Alpin PA3
Relative Score 88 77
Dry 95 77
Wet 86 81
Snow 91 69
Comfort 77 78
Noise 80 –
Treadwear 84 76
Handling (owners) 82 83
Efficiency 90 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 4

CrossClimate 2

± 8

Pilot Alpin PA3

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryCrossClimate 2Pilot Alpin PA3ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #2/6 2026 Wybór Kierowców Winter Tire Test R17 #6/7 2011 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A CrossClimate 2

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and traction in snow, slush, and winter weather conditions
  • Strong braking and handling performance on dry and wet pavement
  • Long-lasting tread wear and durability

Cons

  • Higher initial purchase price
  • Slight negative impact on fuel economy / EV range for some drivers
  • Potential for increased road noise or harshness as the tires wear down
All owner themes in the CrossClimate 2 review

Tire B Pilot Alpin PA3

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and grip on ice, light-to-moderate snow, and wet roads
  • High comfort levels and very low road noise, comparable to summer tires
  • Durable tread life with slow, even wear over thousands of miles

Cons

  • Premium price point that some users find lacking in value
  • Not optimized for deep snow or slow-speed climbing in mountainous 'white' roads
  • Slight loss of braking performance felt on dry roads by some drivers
All owner themes in the Pilot Alpin PA3 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Michelin CrossClimate 2

Positive

The community overwhelmingly praises the Michelin CrossClimate 2 for its exceptional snow, ice, and wet-weather traction, often describing it as an ideal all-weather tire. While many drivers report a quiet, comfortable ride and solid durability, some users note potential downsides including reduced fuel or battery efficiency, road noise on certain surfaces, and premium pricing. A few commenters also point out that the tire may be overkill for regions without significant winter weather.

r/ecoboostmustang ·2 upvotes ·2025-07-28

“On a 2015 Highlander Hybrid, the CC2 is excellent anti-hydroplaning, wonderful snow and ice handling, both moving and stopping. I am a rideshare driver averaging 200 or so miles per day. The tires are only just now a bit noisier at 78,000 miles. Wear is down to 3/32 and went through a wild, heavy rain storm today with no lack of confidence whatsoever. Only downside is that >80 degrees F and gas mileage goes down by 2 mpg. Love the tires so much that I feel the slight loss during summer is still worth it.”

macheforum.com ·8 upvotes ·2021-06-28

“I have the 235 that is a little higher load rating (105 vs 103 stock and 99 for 225). I'm probably getting about a 10% range reduction, but worth it to me for the improved handling and lower braking distance. I work from home and I charge to 90% about once a week unless taking a longer drive. If I did a lot of longer trips it might be an issue, but I am very happy with these tires.”

r/volt ·8 upvotes ·2026-09-18

“Michelin CrossClimate2 efficiency surprisingly good! Just put in a new set of Michelin CrossClimate2s to go along with a move from LA to New England. I was a bit worried about the mileage/range hit but figured the safety in the winter outweighed it. I'm pleasantly surprised! On an all-highway trip from Boston to New Jersey, gas MPG was a steady 42 mpgs and I got about 45 miles on the battery, although I drive like a grandma at the posted speed limits so I think I was close to 44 mpg/45 EV miles on the old OEM tires. Around town in suburbia in good weather I'm still running between 4.0-5.0 miles/kWh. I estimate, at worst, a 5% drop in efficiency. Pretty good considering the Michelins feel so much stickier!”

Top themes
#Snow and ice traction#Wet handling and hydroplaning#Road noise and comfort#Fuel economy and range#Tread wear and longevity#Premium price point#Directional tread design

Based on 762 community posts

Tire B

Michelin Pilot Alpin PA3

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin CrossClimate 2 B · Michelin Pilot Alpin PA3
CategoryAll SeasonWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available92—
Rim diameters15″ – 21″—
Tread depth9 - 10/32″—
UTQG640 B A—
Treadwear warranty60,000 mi—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure50 - 51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin CrossClimate 2

Michelin Pilot Alpin PA3

Winner: Michelin CrossClimate 2 — better snow, dry and treadwear. Where the Michelin Pilot Alpin PA3 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA3 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 91 vs 69 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 95 vs 77 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 84 vs 76 on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 86 vs 81 on wet.

Tire A · Michelin CrossClimate 2
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Alpin PA3

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

CrossClimate 2 or Pilot Alpin PA3?

Which is better in the wet, CrossClimate 2 or Pilot Alpin PA3?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 86 vs 81 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, CrossClimate 2 or Pilot Alpin PA3?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 95 vs 77 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, CrossClimate 2 or Pilot Alpin PA3?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 91 vs 69 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, CrossClimate 2 or Pilot Alpin PA3?

Neither, by our numbers: 77 vs 78 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, CrossClimate 2 or Pilot Alpin PA3?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 84 vs 76 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology