Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 33 + 0 road tests and 21,761 + 13 owner reviews. How we score
CrossClimate 2 is ahead, 88–67
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 87 · 33 tests Owners 87 · 21,761 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 35 in 2023 All Season Tyre 35 Set Shootout (dry braking)
“We downsized from 21” stock on GTline to 20” rims and put on the CC2s—can’t stand the ugly stock rims and plastic covers. It got so much quieter that we noticed we could turn the radio down from 6 to 4 on the secondary roads, and down from 8 to 5 on the highway. Efficiency improved slightly, possibly due to lighter weight wheels.”
Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 13 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | CrossClimate 2 | Scorpion AS+ 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 31 / – tests | 99 | ≈ 66 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 88 | 62 |
CrossClimate 2: 60% × 99.2 + 40% × 88.4 = 95
Scorpion AS+ 3: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 64
No road tests of dry for Scorpion AS+ 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
| Source | CrossClimate 2 | Scorpion AS+ 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 31 / – tests | 83 | ≈ 72 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 92 | 72 |
CrossClimate 2: 60% × 83.2 + 40% × 91.8 = 87
Scorpion AS+ 3: 60% × 71.7 (est.) + 40% × 72.4 = 72
No road tests of wet for Scorpion AS+ 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | CrossClimate 2 | Scorpion AS+ 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 27 / – tests | 99 | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 79 | 60 |
CrossClimate 2: 60% × 98.5 + 40% × 78.8 = 91
Scorpion AS+ 3: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 60.1 = 64
No road tests of snow for Scorpion AS+ 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
| Source | CrossClimate 2 | Scorpion AS+ 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / – tests | 67 | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 86 | 58 |
CrossClimate 2: 40% × 67 + 60% × 86.1 = 78
Scorpion AS+ 3: 40% × 66.6 (est.) + 60% × 58.3 = 62
No road tests of comfort for Scorpion AS+ 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
| Source | CrossClimate 2 | Scorpion AS+ 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / – tests | 77 | – |
| Reviews found online | 83 | – |
CrossClimate 2: 60% × 76.9 + 40% × 82.6 = 79
| Source | CrossClimate 2 | Scorpion AS+ 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / – tests | 81 | ≈ 69 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 88 | 73 |
CrossClimate 2: 60% × 81.2 + 40% × 88 = 84
Scorpion AS+ 3: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 73 = 71
No road tests of treadwear for Scorpion AS+ 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | CrossClimate 2 | Scorpion AS+ 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 82 | 59 |
| Source | CrossClimate 2 | Scorpion AS+ 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 23 / – tests | 90 | – |
| Category | Michelin CrossClimate 2 | Pirelli Scorpion AS+ 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 88 | 67 |
| Dry | 95 | 64 |
| Wet | 87 | 72 |
| Snow | 91 | 64 |
| Comfort | 78 | 62 |
| Noise | 79 | – |
| Treadwear | 84 | 71 |
| Handling (owners) | 82 | 59 |
| Efficiency | 90 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
CrossClimate 2
Scorpion AS+ 3
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Most posters praise the CrossClimate 2 for strong snow, wet and hydroplaning grip, a quiet ride after break-in, and good tread life. Those who criticise it cite a small to moderate MPG or range loss, noise or a harsh ride for some owners, mixed wear reports, and a high price. A vocal minority calls it overhyped or unnecessary where snow is rare, and says rivals such as the Nokian WRG5 or Michelin Defender 2 suit some drivers better.
“I live in Vancouver,WA and the CC2 are great for our climate even the light snowfall. I have an SR+, so they’re the 18” version. I have about 22K miles on them after 2 years and have averaged 240Wh/mi since installation, and I don’t drive conservatively. They did increase power usage by about 15-20Wh/mi. I’ve also been lazy and haven’t rotated them and they still are wearing very well. Got about 8/32nd up front and 6/32 in rear. Much better than the stock tires that were almost worn out at 22K. Note that places like Costco will not install these on your Tesla because they don’t meet the factory speed rating. It’s a CYA thing.”
“Michelin CrossClimate2 efficiency surprisingly good! Just put in a new set of Michelin CrossClimate2s to go along with a move from LA to New England. I was a bit worried about the mileage/range hit but figured the safety in the winter outweighed it. I'm pleasantly surprised! On an all-highway trip from Boston to New Jersey, gas MPG was a steady 42 mpgs and I got about 45 miles on the battery, although I drive like a grandma at the posted speed limits so I think I was close to 44 mpg/45 EV miles on the old OEM tires. Around town in suburbia in good weather I'm still running between 4.0-5.0 miles/kWh. I estimate, at worst, a 5% drop in efficiency. Pretty good considering the Michelins feel so much stickier!”
“I have the 235 that is a little higher load rating (105 vs 103 stock and 99 for 225). I'm probably getting about a 10% range reduction, but worth it to me for the improved handling and lower braking distance. I work from home and I charge to 90% about once a week unless taking a longer drive. If I did a lot of longer trips it might be an issue, but I am very happy with these tires.”
Based on 765 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Michelin CrossClimate 2 | B · Pirelli Scorpion AS+ 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
| Sizes available | 92 | 1 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 21″ | 20″ |
| Tread depth | 9 - 10/32″ | 10 - 11/32″ |
| UTQG | 640 B A | 800 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 60,000 mi | 70,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | 44 - 51 psi |
Michelin CrossClimate 2
Pirelli Scorpion AS+ 3
Winner: Michelin CrossClimate 2 — better dry, snow and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score. Pirelli Scorpion AS+ 3 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 13 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 95 vs 64 on dry.
Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 91 vs 64 on snow.
Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 82 vs 59 on handling.
Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 78 vs 62 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Michelin CrossClimate 2, 87 vs 72 on our wet score.
Michelin CrossClimate 2, 95 vs 64 on our dry score.
Michelin CrossClimate 2, 91 vs 64 on our snow score.
Michelin CrossClimate 2, 78 vs 62 on our comfort score.
Michelin CrossClimate 2, 84 vs 71 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology
