Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Defender T+H vs Goodyear Eagle LS-2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 1 + 148 owner reviews. How we score

Defender T+H is ahead, 70–58

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Defender T+H
Tire AMichelin

Defender T+H

Premium Touring All Season tire

± 8Provisional

Tests – · 1 test Owners 69 · 1 review

Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2022 Consumer Reports All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Goodyear Eagle LS-2
Tire BGoodyear

Eagle LS-2

All Season

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 148 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    Defender T+H +14
    55
    Why this score
    SourceDefender T+HEagle LS-2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online7049

    Defender T+H: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 69

    Eagle LS-2: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 48.6 = 55

    No road tests of dry for Defender T+H. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Eagle LS-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 72

    Wet

    Defender T+H +11
    61
    Why this score
    SourceDefender T+HEagle LS-2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online7357

    Defender T+H: 60% × 71.9 (est.) + 40% × 72.8 = 72

    Eagle LS-2: 60% × 63.2 (est.) + 40% × 56.9 = 61

    No road tests of wet for Defender T+H. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Eagle LS-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 65

    Snow

    Defender T+H +5
    60
    Why this score
    SourceDefender T+HEagle LS-2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6153

    Defender T+H: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 61.1 = 65

    Eagle LS-2: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 52.9 = 60

    No road tests of snow for Defender T+H. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Eagle LS-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 67

    Comfort

    Defender T+H +10
    57
    Why this score
    SourceDefender T+HEagle LS-2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6652

    Defender T+H: 40% × 68.1 (est.) + 60% × 66 = 67

    Eagle LS-2: 40% × 65.2 (est.) + 60% × 51.6 = 57

    No road tests of comfort for Defender T+H. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Eagle LS-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    62
    Why this score
    SourceDefender T+HEagle LS-2
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online–56

    Eagle LS-2: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 56.3 = 62

    No road tests of noise for Eagle LS-2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 73

    Treadwear

    Defender T+H +18
    55
    Why this score
    SourceDefender T+HEagle LS-2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests76≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online6848

    Defender T+H: 60% × 76.1 + 40% × 67.9 = 73

    Eagle LS-2: 60% × 59.8 (est.) + 40% × 48 = 55

    No road tests of treadwear for Eagle LS-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    49
    Why this score
    SourceDefender T+HEagle LS-2
    Reviews found online–49
Scores at a glance
Michelin Defender T+H vs Goodyear Eagle LS-2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin Defender T+HGoodyear Eagle LS-2
Relative Score 70 58
Dry 69 55
Wet 72 61
Snow 65 60
Comfort 67 57
Noise – 62
Treadwear 73 55
Handling (owners) – 49

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Defender T+H

± 8

Eagle LS-2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Defender T+H

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Eagle LS-2

Pros

  • Low road noise and exceptional ride comfort
  • Precise dry handling and solid straight-line stability
  • Good overall value and fuel efficiency

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear and shorter lifespan for some drivers
  • Increased road noise over time due to cupping
  • Mediocre wet and winter traction when worn
All owner themes in the Eagle LS-2 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Defender T+H B · Goodyear Eagle LS-2
CategoryPremium Touring All Season tireAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—22
Rim diameters—15″ – 20″
Tread depth—9 - 12/32″
UTQG820 A - B B360 - 400 A A - B
Sidewall—Black Side Wall - Vertical Serrated Band
Max pressure—44 - 51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Defender T+H

Goodyear Eagle LS-2

Winner: Michelin Defender T+H — better treadwear, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Defender T+H rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 1 review), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Michelin Defender T+H scores 73 vs 55 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Defender T+H scores 69 vs 55 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Defender T+H scores 72 vs 61 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Defender T+H scores 67 vs 57 on comfort.

Tire A · Michelin Defender T+H
Tire B · Goodyear Eagle LS-2

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Defender T+H or Eagle LS-2?

Which is better in the wet, Defender T+H or Eagle LS-2?

Michelin Defender T+H, 72 vs 61 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Defender T+H or Eagle LS-2?

Michelin Defender T+H, 69 vs 55 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Defender T+H or Eagle LS-2?

Michelin Defender T+H, 65 vs 60 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Defender T+H or Eagle LS-2?

Michelin Defender T+H, 67 vs 57 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Defender T+H or Eagle LS-2?

Michelin Defender T+H, 73 vs 55 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology