Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Defender T+H vs Michelin Primacy MXM4 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 1 road tests and 1 + 10 owner reviews. How we score

Defender T+H is ahead, 70–62

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Defender T+H
Tire AMichelin

Defender T+H

Premium Touring All Season tire

± 8Provisional

Tests – · 1 test Owners 69 · 1 review

Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2022 Consumer Reports All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Michelin Primacy MXM4
Tire BMichelin

Primacy MXM4

All Season

± 7Provisional

Tests 72 · 1 test Owners 54 · 10 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 70

    Dry

    Primacy MXM4 +3
    73
    Why this score
    SourceDefender T+HPrimacy MXM4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 69 (est.)87
    Reviews found online7152

    Defender T+H: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.9 = 70

    Primacy MXM4: 60% × 87.2 + 40% × 51.9 = 73

    No road tests of dry for Defender T+H. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 73

    Wet

    Defender T+H +16
    57
    Why this score
    SourceDefender T+HPrimacy MXM4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 72 (est.)56
    Reviews found online7358

    Defender T+H: 60% × 72.2 (est.) + 40% × 73.4 = 73

    Primacy MXM4: 60% × 56.1 + 40% × 57.5 = 57

    No road tests of wet for Defender T+H. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 65

    Snow

    Defender T+H +9
    56
    Why this score
    SourceDefender T+HPrimacy MXM4
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online6248

    Defender T+H: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 62.1 = 65

    Primacy MXM4: 60% × 62.2 (est.) + 40% × 47.9 = 56

    No road tests of snow for Defender T+H. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for Primacy MXM4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 68

    Comfort

    Defender T+H +13
    55
    Why this score
    SourceDefender T+HPrimacy MXM4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 69 (est.)64
    Reviews found online6748

    Defender T+H: 40% × 68.7 (est.) + 60% × 67 = 68

    Primacy MXM4: 40% × 63.9 + 60% × 48.3 = 55

    No road tests of comfort for Defender T+H. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    76
    Why this score
    SourceDefender T+HPrimacy MXM4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–82
    Reviews found online–≈ 67 (est.)

    Primacy MXM4: 60% × 81.9 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 76

    No owner ratings of noise for Primacy MXM4. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 73

    Treadwear

    Defender T+H +11
    62
    Why this score
    SourceDefender T+HPrimacy MXM4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests76≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online6859

    Defender T+H: 60% × 76.1 + 40% × 68 = 73

    Primacy MXM4: 60% × 63.7 (est.) + 40% × 59.3 = 62

    No road tests of treadwear for Primacy MXM4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    50
    Why this score
    SourceDefender T+HPrimacy MXM4
    Reviews found online–50
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    55
    Why this score
    SourceDefender T+HPrimacy MXM4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–55
Scores at a glance
Michelin Defender T+H vs Michelin Primacy MXM4: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin Defender T+HMichelin Primacy MXM4
Relative Score 70 62
Dry 70 73
Wet 73 57
Snow 65 56
Comfort 68 55
Noise – 76
Treadwear 73 62
Handling (owners) – 50
Efficiency – 55

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Defender T+H

± 7

Primacy MXM4

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryDefender T+HPrimacy MXM4ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #1/8 2022 Consumer Reports All-Season Tires #4/3 2024 AutoView All-Season Tire Test R18 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Defender T+H

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Primacy MXM4

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and vibration dampening
  • Strong tread life and durability
  • High fuel efficiency

Cons

  • Mediocre dry grip and handling precision
  • Noticeable understeer when cornering
  • Soft sidewalls that lack steering feedback
All owner themes in the Primacy MXM4 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Defender T+H B · Michelin Primacy MXM4
CategoryPremium Touring All Season tireAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Defender T+H

Michelin Primacy MXM4

Winner: Michelin Defender T+H — better wet, comfort and treadwear. Pick the Michelin Primacy MXM4 if dry matters most to you. Michelin Defender T+H rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 1 review), so read this result as provisional. Michelin Primacy MXM4 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Defender T+H scores 73 vs 57 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Defender T+H scores 68 vs 55 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Michelin Defender T+H scores 73 vs 62 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Michelin Defender T+H scores 65 vs 56 on snow.

Tire A · Michelin Defender T+H
Tire B · Michelin Primacy MXM4

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Defender T+H or Primacy MXM4?

Which is better in the wet, Defender T+H or Primacy MXM4?

Michelin Defender T+H, 73 vs 57 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Defender T+H or Primacy MXM4?

Michelin Primacy MXM4, 73 vs 70 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Defender T+H or Primacy MXM4?

Michelin Defender T+H, 65 vs 56 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Defender T+H or Primacy MXM4?

Michelin Defender T+H, 68 vs 55 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Defender T+H or Primacy MXM4?

Michelin Defender T+H, 73 vs 62 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology