Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Defender T+H vs Yokohama AVID ENVigor — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 1 + 72 owner reviews. How we score

Defender T+H leads, 70–66 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Defender T+H
Tire AMichelin

Defender T+H

Premium Touring All Season tire

± 8Provisional

Tests – · 1 test Owners 69 · 1 review

Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2022 Consumer Reports All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Yokohama AVID ENVigor
Tire BYokohama

AVID ENVigor

All Season High Performance tires

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 72 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    Defender T+H +1
    68
    Why this score
    SourceDefender T+HAVID ENVigor
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7068

    Defender T+H: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 69

    AVID ENVigor: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 67.7 = 68

    No road tests of dry for Defender T+H. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for AVID ENVigor. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 72

    Wet

    Defender T+H +2
    70
    Why this score
    SourceDefender T+HAVID ENVigor
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7370

    Defender T+H: 60% × 71.9 (est.) + 40% × 72.8 = 72

    AVID ENVigor: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 69.6 = 70

    No road tests of wet for Defender T+H. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for AVID ENVigor. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 65

    Snow

    Defender T+H +5
    60
    Why this score
    SourceDefender T+HAVID ENVigor
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6152

    Defender T+H: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 61.1 = 65

    AVID ENVigor: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 52.2 = 60

    No road tests of snow for Defender T+H. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for AVID ENVigor. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 67

    Comfort

    Defender T+H +5
    62
    Why this score
    SourceDefender T+HAVID ENVigor
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6659

    Defender T+H: 40% × 68.1 (est.) + 60% × 66 = 67

    AVID ENVigor: 40% × 66.7 (est.) + 60% × 59.1 = 62

    No road tests of comfort for Defender T+H. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for AVID ENVigor. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    65
    Why this score
    SourceDefender T+HAVID ENVigor
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online–64

    AVID ENVigor: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 64 = 65

    No road tests of noise for AVID ENVigor. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 73

    Treadwear

    Defender T+H +9
    64
    Why this score
    SourceDefender T+HAVID ENVigor
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests76≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6863

    Defender T+H: 60% × 76.1 + 40% × 67.9 = 73

    AVID ENVigor: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 63.1 = 64

    No road tests of treadwear for AVID ENVigor. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    62
    Why this score
    SourceDefender T+HAVID ENVigor
    Reviews found online–62
Scores at a glance
Michelin Defender T+H vs Yokohama AVID ENVigor: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin Defender T+HYokohama AVID ENVigor
Relative Score 70 66
Dry 69 68
Wet 72 70
Snow 65 60
Comfort 67 62
Noise – 65
Treadwear 73 64
Handling (owners) – 62

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Defender T+H

± 7

AVID ENVigor

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Defender T+H

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B AVID ENVigor

Pros

  • Smooth and exceptionally quiet ride comfort
  • Great value and competitive pricing
  • Strong dry and wet weather traction and handling

Cons

  • Subpar grip in snow and winter conditions
  • Minor noise reported at specific mid-range speeds by some users
  • Product line has been discontinued by Yokohama, making replacements harder to find
All owner themes in the AVID ENVigor review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Defender T+H B · Yokohama AVID ENVigor
CategoryPremium Touring All Season tireAll Season High Performance tires
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth—10/32″
UTQG820 A - B B560 A A
Treadwear warranty—60,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Defender T+H

Yokohama AVID ENVigor

Narrow edge: Michelin Defender T+H — better treadwear, snow and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Defender T+H rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 1 review), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Michelin Defender T+H scores 73 vs 64 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Michelin Defender T+H scores 65 vs 60 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Defender T+H scores 67 vs 62 on comfort.

Tire A · Michelin Defender T+H
Tire B · Yokohama AVID ENVigor

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Defender T+H or AVID ENVigor?

Which is better in the wet, Defender T+H or AVID ENVigor?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 70 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Defender T+H or AVID ENVigor?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 68 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, Defender T+H or AVID ENVigor?

Michelin Defender T+H, 65 vs 60 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Defender T+H or AVID ENVigor?

Michelin Defender T+H, 67 vs 62 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Defender T+H or AVID ENVigor?

Michelin Defender T+H, 73 vs 64 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology