Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 0 road tests and 11,304 + 41 owner reviews. How we score
Defender2 is ahead, 76–65
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 64 · 2 tests Owners 89 · 11,304 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test (noise (tester's mark))
“I just ordered Michelin Defender 2 for our 15 Outback . We've had 2 sets of Yokohama YK-CTX after OEM which only lasted about 20k (first set) and 25k (second set). I've had Michelin Defender (orig) and Michelin Defender2 on our Ford Taurus. Very comfortable and great tread life.”
Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 41 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Defender2 | Ecopia H/L 422 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 73 | ≈ 65 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 92 | 60 |
Defender2: 60% × 72.7 + 40% × 91.6 = 80
Ecopia H/L 422 Plus: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 59.9 = 63
No road tests of dry for Ecopia H/L 422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
| Source | Defender2 | Ecopia H/L 422 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 64 | ≈ 68 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 93 | 66 |
Defender2: 60% × 64 + 40% × 92.5 = 75
Ecopia H/L 422 Plus: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 66.1 = 67
No road tests of wet for Ecopia H/L 422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Defender2 | Ecopia H/L 422 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 46 | ≈ 69 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 79 | 67 |
Defender2: 60% × 46.4 + 40% × 79.4 = 60
Ecopia H/L 422 Plus: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.7 = 68
No road tests of snow for Ecopia H/L 422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
| Source | Defender2 | Ecopia H/L 422 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 73 (est.) | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 88 | 58 |
Defender2: 40% × 72.6 (est.) + 60% × 87.6 = 82
Ecopia H/L 422 Plus: 40% × 66.6 (est.) + 60% × 58.2 = 62
No road tests of comfort for Defender2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Ecopia H/L 422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
| Source | Defender2 | Ecopia H/L 422 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 73 | ≈ 66 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 87 | 59 |
Defender2: 60% × 73.2 + 40% × 87 = 79
Ecopia H/L 422 Plus: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 59.4 = 64
No road tests of noise for Ecopia H/L 422 Plus. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Defender2 | Ecopia H/L 422 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 75 (est.) | ≈ 63 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 89 | 58 |
Defender2: 60% × 74.6 (est.) + 40% × 89 = 80
Ecopia H/L 422 Plus: 60% × 63.3 (est.) + 40% × 57.6 = 61
No road tests of treadwear for Defender2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Ecopia H/L 422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | Defender2 | Ecopia H/L 422 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 89 | – |
| Category | Michelin Defender2 | Bridgestone Ecopia H/L 422 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 76 | 65 |
| Dry | 80 | 63 |
| Wet | 75 | 67 |
| Snow | 60 | 68 |
| Comfort | 82 | 62 |
| Noise | 79 | 64 |
| Treadwear | 80 | 61 |
| Handling (owners) | 89 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Defender2
Ecopia H/L 422 Plus
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
The community generally views the Michelin Defender2 as a top-tier all-season touring tire, praised mainly for exceptional tread life (reports of 60–80k miles on Teslas), comfort, quiet ride, efficiency, and the 80k warranty. It is frequently recommended, including by Consumer Reports, though it is considered not a performance tire and some say road noise could be better. Minor concerns include speed-rating fitment issues, lack of a snowflake rating, MPG versus competitors, and one report of chemical off-gassing.
“Michelin CC2 or Defender2 or Continental crosscontact LX25?? For 2019 Honda Crv. I heard a lot of pros for these tires in the following order. CC2 --> Defender2 --> LX25 But Cons which i what i like to know about.. CC2 - lots of reviews on mpg hit. Defender2 - Not sure if also has mpg hit. Lx25 - I have a friend who is already 20k on it and tire looks new and didn't mention about any mpg hit for him Thank you. Update: Thank you for all your valuable reviews, I have ordered these from Costco and should get them rolling soon. MICHELIN DEFENDER2 AS 235/60R18 107H XL BSW ALL SEASON TIRE. Read more”
“I’m having a set of four 235/65R18 Michelin Defender2’s installed on the Cadillac as I’m typing this post. I’m at America’s Tire. I’m replacing the OEM Michelin Primacy Tour AS tires that only lasted 25,500 miles. I’m hoping that the Defender2’s will last longer, be quieter and smoother riding. We’ll see!”
“My local tire guys recommended the Michelin Defender2, 225/50R18 99V XL instead of the Michelin PS AS4 to replace my original Bridgestones. My i4 is a 2024 eDrive40 with 18” wheels, and I always drive in Eco, so the high-performance Pilot Sport is more than I need. Anybody out there with Michelin Defender2 experience ❓”
Based on 26 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Michelin Defender2 | B · Bridgestone Ecopia H/L 422 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All-Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 1 | 19 |
| Rim diameters | 18″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 10 - 11/32″ | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 840 B B | 600 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 80,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | 51 psi |
Michelin Defender2
Bridgestone Ecopia H/L 422 Plus
Winner: Michelin Defender2 — better comfort, treadwear and dry. Pick the Bridgestone Ecopia H/L 422 Plus if snow matters most to you.
Michelin Defender2 scores 82 vs 62 on comfort.
Michelin Defender2 scores 80 vs 61 on treadwear.
Michelin Defender2 scores 80 vs 63 on dry.
Michelin Defender2 scores 79 vs 64 on noise.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Michelin Defender2, 75 vs 67 on our wet score.
Michelin Defender2, 80 vs 63 on our dry score.
Bridgestone Ecopia H/L 422 Plus, 68 vs 60 on our snow score.
Michelin Defender2, 79 vs 64 on our noise score.
Michelin Defender2, 82 vs 62 on our comfort score.
Michelin Defender2, 80 vs 61 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology
