Tests – · none yet Owners 44 · 10 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Michelin Energy Saver A/S vs Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 10 + 55 owner reviews. How we score
Assurance Fuel Max is ahead, 62–52
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 59 · 55 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
52
Dry
Assurance Fuel Max +1062Why this score
Source Energy Saver A/S Assurance Fuel Max Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 58 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 44 59 Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 57.9 (est.) + 40% × 43.8 = 52
Assurance Fuel Max: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 59.1 = 62
No road tests of dry for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Assurance Fuel Max. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
51
Wet
Assurance Fuel Max +1263Why this score
Source Energy Saver A/S Assurance Fuel Max Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 56 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 43 60 Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 55.6 (est.) + 40% × 43.2 = 51
Assurance Fuel Max: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 60.1 = 63
No road tests of wet for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Assurance Fuel Max. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
55
Snow
Assurance Fuel Max +560Why this score
Source Energy Saver A/S Assurance Fuel Max Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 44 52 Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 62.1 (est.) + 40% × 43.7 = 55
Assurance Fuel Max: 60% × 64.8 (est.) + 40% × 52.3 = 60
No road tests of snow for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Assurance Fuel Max. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
52
Comfort
Assurance Fuel Max +557Why this score
Source Energy Saver A/S Assurance Fuel Max Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 45 51 Energy Saver A/S: 40% × 63.9 (est.) + 60% × 44.9 = 52
Assurance Fuel Max: 40% × 65.2 (est.) + 60% × 51.3 = 57
No road tests of comfort for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Assurance Fuel Max. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison64Why this score
Source Energy Saver A/S Assurance Fuel Max Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online – 61 Assurance Fuel Max: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 61.1 = 64
No road tests of noise for Assurance Fuel Max. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
53
Treadwear
Assurance Fuel Max +1265Why this score
Source Energy Saver A/S Assurance Fuel Max Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 59 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 45 64 Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 58.8 (est.) + 40% × 44.9 = 53
Assurance Fuel Max: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 63.6 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Assurance Fuel Max. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
45
Handling (owners)
Assurance Fuel Max +1156Why this score
Source Energy Saver A/S Assurance Fuel Max Reviews found online 45 56
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Energy Saver A/S | Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 52 | 62 |
| Dry | 52 | 62 |
| Wet | 51 | 63 |
| Snow | 55 | 60 |
| Comfort | 52 | 57 |
| Noise | – | 64 |
| Treadwear | 53 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 45 | 56 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
52
/ 100
Energy Saver A/S
62
/ 100
Assurance Fuel Max
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Energy Saver A/S
Pros
- High fuel economy and rolling efficiency
- Potential for high mileage in specific driving conditions
- Reliable dry weather traction for some users
Cons
- Significant hydroplaning tendencies in wet conditions
- Inconsistent tread life, with reports of premature wear
- Excessive road noise and audible squealing during cornering
Tire B Assurance Fuel Max
Pros
- Noticeable improvement in fuel economy / MPG
- Reliable wet and dry traction and handling
- Impressive long-term tread life and longevity
Cons
- Some road noise on specific asphalt surfaces
- Fuel savings may be less noticeable at higher highway speeds over 75 mph
- Soft rubber compound can be vulnerable to sharp winter cinders or road debris
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Energy Saver A/S | B · Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 7 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9 - 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 480 A - B A - B | 580 - 620 A A - B |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 65,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall - Vertical Serrated Band |
| Max pressure | — | 50 - 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
52
/ 100
Michelin Energy Saver A/S
62
/ 100
Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max
Winner: Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max — better wet, treadwear and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Energy Saver A/S rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max scores 63 vs 51 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max scores 65 vs 53 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max scores 56 vs 45 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max scores 62 vs 52 on dry.
Tire A · Michelin Energy Saver A/S
Tire B · Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Energy Saver A/S or Assurance Fuel Max?
Which is better in the wet, Energy Saver A/S or Assurance Fuel Max?
Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max, 63 vs 51 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Energy Saver A/S or Assurance Fuel Max?
Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max, 62 vs 52 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Energy Saver A/S or Assurance Fuel Max?
Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max, 60 vs 55 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, Energy Saver A/S or Assurance Fuel Max?
Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max, 57 vs 52 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Energy Saver A/S or Assurance Fuel Max?
Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max, 65 vs 53 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology