tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Energy Saver vs Nexen N Fera SU1 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Energy Saver leads, 68–65 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · Energy Saver or N Fera SU1 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire AMichelin

Energy Saver

Summer

Tests 71 · 1 test Owners 66 · 137 reviews

Best test result: #3 of 20 in 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test (rolling resistance)

Tire BNexen

N Fera SU1

Summer

Tests 64 · 3 tests Owners 63 · 164 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 10 in 2020 Teknikens 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test (rolling resistance)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    Energy Saver +10
    59
    Why this score
    SourceEnergy SaverN Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score)7055
    Reviews found online6664
    Dry Braking (% of best)92%94%
    Dry Handling (% of best)98%95%
  2. 68

    Wet

    Energy Saver +3
    65
    Why this score
    SourceEnergy SaverN Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score)7063
    Reviews found online6668
    Wet Braking (% of best)89%94%
    Wet Handling (% of best)95%95%
  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    58
    Why this score
    SourceEnergy SaverN Fera SU1
    Reviews found online–50
  4. 68

    Comfort

    Energy Saver +2
    66
    Why this score
    SourceEnergy SaverN Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score)–66
    Reviews found online6667
  5. 68

    Noise

    N Fera SU1 +1
    69
    Why this score
    SourceEnergy SaverN Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score)7269
    Reviews found online6269
  6. 71

    Treadwear

    Energy Saver +4
    67
    Why this score
    SourceEnergy SaverN Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score)7370
    Reviews found online6861
  7. 63

    Handling

    N Fera SU1 +3
    66
    Why this score
    SourceEnergy SaverN Fera SU1
    Reviews found online6366
Scores at a glance
CategoryMichelin Energy SaverNexen N Fera SU1
Relative Score 68 65
Dry 69 59
Wet 68 65
Snow – 58
Comfort 68 66
Noise 68 69
Treadwear 71 67
Handling 63 66

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Energy Saver

N Fera SU1

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.

DisciplineCategoryEnergy SaverN Fera SU1ΔBoth?
Dry Braking Dry 92% #13/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test 94% #4/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test −1.8 Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 98% #7/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test 95% #4/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test +3.5 Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 88% #3/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test 99% #2/10 · 2020 Teknikens 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test −11.2 Different tests
Noise Other 99% #5/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test 99% #3/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test −0.4 Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall 20% #5/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test 20% #5/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test 0.0 Different tests
Straight Aqua Straight 95% #8/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test 92% #10/10 · 2020 Teknikens 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test +2.6 Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 89% #17/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test 94% #5/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test −5.0 Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 95% #16/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test 95% #3/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test +0.8 Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Energy Saver

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and long-lasting durability
  • Noticeable improvements in fuel economy and low rolling resistance
  • Low road noise and high levels of driving comfort

Cons

  • Subpar wet-weather grip and traction, especially as the tires age
  • Prone to dry rotting, cracking, and hardening after a few years
  • Poor performance and sliding in cold or winter conditions
All owner themes in the Energy Saver review

Tire B N Fera SU1

Pros

  • Exceptional value and significantly lower price compared to premium brands
  • Remarkably quiet ride and high overall comfort
  • Strong dry and wet grip for daily commuting and spirited driving

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls can cause vague handling, body roll, or a floating sensation on heavier vehicles
  • Faster than average tread wear or inconsistent durability for some users
  • Reports of rubber cracking or splitting along the sidewalls and tread blocks over time
All owner themes in the N Fera SU1 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Energy Saver B · Nexen N Fera SU1
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available497
Rim diameters15″ – 16″15″ – 24″
Tread depth—9/32″
UTQG—300 A A
Treadwear warranty—25,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Energy Saver

Nexen N Fera SU1

Winner: Michelin Energy Saver — better dry, treadwear and wet. Pick the Nexen N Fera SU1 if handling matters most to you.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Energy Saver scores 69 vs 59 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Michelin Energy Saver scores 71 vs 67 on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Energy Saver scores 68 vs 65 on wet.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 66 vs 63 on handling.

Tire A · Michelin Energy Saver
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Nexen N Fera SU1
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

68

Narrow edge

Energy Saver

Amazon