tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Energy X2+ vs Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Energy X2+ is ahead, 74–62

Check price on Amazon · Energy X2+ or Aspec A349 BluEarth on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    Energy X2+ +14
    59
    Why this score
    SourceEnergy X2+Aspec A349 BluEarth
    Reviews found online7754
  2. 78

    Wet

    Energy X2+ +19
    59
    Why this score
    SourceEnergy X2+Aspec A349 BluEarth
    Reviews found online8155
  3. 73

    Comfort

    Energy X2+ +11
    62
    Why this score
    SourceEnergy X2+Aspec A349 BluEarth
    Reviews found online7654
  4. 72

    Treadwear

    Energy X2+ +5
    67
    Why this score
    SourceEnergy X2+Aspec A349 BluEarth
    Reviews found online7669
  5. 75

    Handling

    Energy X2+ +14
    61
    Why this score
    SourceEnergy X2+Aspec A349 BluEarth
    Reviews found online7561
Scores at a glance
CategoryMichelin Energy X2+Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth
Relative Score 74 62
Dry 73 59
Wet 78 59
Comfort 73 62
Treadwear 72 67
Handling 75 61

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Energy X2+

Aspec A349 BluEarth

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Energy X2+

Pros

  • Exceptional wet weather performance and water displacement capabilities
  • High durability and long tread life due to the hard compound construction
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality

Cons

  • Slightly firmer ride quality when using lower sidewall profiles
  • Potential for increased road feedback depending on vehicle suspension setup
  • Wet grip ratings are occasionally perceived as slightly lower than dry grip performance
All owner themes in the Energy X2+ review

Tire B Aspec A349 BluEarth

Pros

  • Impressive tread life and durability for an OEM tire
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Reliable handling and lateral grip in dry conditions

Cons

  • Poor traction and tendency to spin on wet surfaces
  • High price point compared to aftermarket competitors
  • Mediocre cornering ability and grip during aggressive maneuvers
All owner themes in the Aspec A349 BluEarth review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Energy X2+ B · Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Energy X2+

Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth

Winner: Michelin Energy X2+ — better wet, dry and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Energy X2+ scores 78 vs 59 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Energy X2+ scores 73 vs 59 on dry.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Energy X2+ scores 75 vs 61 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Energy X2+ scores 73 vs 62 on comfort.

Tire A · Michelin Energy X2+
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

74

Leads

Energy X2+

Amazon