tirewheelguide

Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 11 + 60 owner reviews. How we score

BluEarth Es ES32 is ahead, 71–61

Check price on Amazon · BluEarth Es ES32 or Aspec A349 BluEarth on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 58

    Dry

    BluEarth Es ES32 +12
    70
    Why this score
    SourceAspec A349 BluEarthBluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online5371

    Aspec A349 BluEarth: 60% × 61.7 (est.) + 40% × 53 = 58

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.4 = 70

    No road tests of dry for Aspec A349 BluEarth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 59

    Wet

    BluEarth Es ES32 +15
    74
    Why this score
    SourceAspec A349 BluEarthBluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online5575

    Aspec A349 BluEarth: 60% × 61.8 (est.) + 40% × 54.6 = 59

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 72.9 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 74

    No road tests of wet for Aspec A349 BluEarth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 58

    Comfort

    BluEarth Es ES32 +15
    73
    Why this score
    SourceAspec A349 BluEarthBluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online5275

    Aspec A349 BluEarth: 40% × 66 (est.) + 60% × 52.1 = 58

    BluEarth Es ES32: 40% × 70.2 (est.) + 60% × 74.7 = 73

    No road tests of comfort for Aspec A349 BluEarth or BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 68

    Treadwear

    Aspec A349 BluEarth +3
    65
    Why this score
    SourceAspec A349 BluEarthBluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6965

    Aspec A349 BluEarth: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 68.7 = 68

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Aspec A349 BluEarth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  5. 62

    Handling (owners)

    BluEarth Es ES32 +13
    75
    Why this score
    SourceAspec A349 BluEarthBluEarth Es ES32
    Reviews found online6275
Scores at a glance
CategoryYokohama Aspec A349 BluEarthYokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Relative Score 61 71
Dry 58 70
Wet 59 74
Comfort 58 73
Treadwear 68 65
Handling (owners) 62 75

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Aspec A349 BluEarth

± 8

BluEarth Es ES32

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Aspec A349 BluEarth

Pros

  • Impressive tread life and durability for an OEM tire
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Reliable handling and lateral grip in dry conditions

Cons

  • Poor traction and tendency to spin on wet surfaces
  • High price point compared to aftermarket competitors
  • Mediocre cornering ability and grip during aggressive maneuvers
All owner themes in the Aspec A349 BluEarth review

Tire B BluEarth Es ES32

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
  • Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
  • Reliable dry-weather traction and handling

Cons

  • Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
  • Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
  • Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
All owner themes in the BluEarth Es ES32 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—64
Rim diameters—13″ – 18″

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32

Winner: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better wet, comfort and handling. Pick the Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth if treadwear matters most to you. Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 74 vs 59 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 73 vs 58 on comfort.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 75 vs 62 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 70 vs 58 on dry.

Tire A · Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Aspec A349 BluEarth or BluEarth Es ES32?

Which is better in the wet, Aspec A349 BluEarth or BluEarth Es ES32?

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 74 vs 59 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Aspec A349 BluEarth or BluEarth Es ES32?

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 70 vs 58 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Aspec A349 BluEarth or BluEarth Es ES32?

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 73 vs 58 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Aspec A349 BluEarth or BluEarth Es ES32?

Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth, 68 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology