Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 vs Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 14 + 0 road tests and 124 + 11 owner reviews. How we score

Ventus Prime 3 K125 is ahead, 78–61

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125
± 5

Tests 77 · 14 tests Owners 75 · 124 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 53 in 2021 53 Summer Tyre Braking Test (dry braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 85

    Dry

    Ventus Prime 3 K125 +27
    58
    Why this score
    SourceVentus Prime 3 K125Aspec A349 BluEarth
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / – tests89≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online7953

    Ventus Prime 3 K125: 60% × 88.5 + 40% × 79.3 = 85

    Aspec A349 BluEarth: 60% × 61.7 (est.) + 40% × 53 = 58

    No road tests of dry for Aspec A349 BluEarth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 80

    Wet

    Ventus Prime 3 K125 +21
    59
    Why this score
    SourceVentus Prime 3 K125Aspec A349 BluEarth
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / – tests82≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online7755

    Ventus Prime 3 K125: 60% × 81.8 + 40% × 77.1 = 80

    Aspec A349 BluEarth: 60% × 61.8 (est.) + 40% × 54.6 = 59

    No road tests of wet for Aspec A349 BluEarth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 74

    Comfort

    Ventus Prime 3 K125 +16
    58
    Why this score
    SourceVentus Prime 3 K125Aspec A349 BluEarth
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests76≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7252

    Ventus Prime 3 K125: 40% × 75.9 + 60% × 72.4 = 74

    Aspec A349 BluEarth: 40% × 66 (est.) + 60% × 52.1 = 58

    No road tests of comfort for Aspec A349 BluEarth. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 75

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceVentus Prime 3 K125Aspec A349 BluEarth
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests80–
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)–

    Ventus Prime 3 K125: 60% × 80.3 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 75

    No owner ratings of noise for Ventus Prime 3 K125. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 65

    Treadwear

    Aspec A349 BluEarth +3
    68
    Why this score
    SourceVentus Prime 3 K125Aspec A349 BluEarth
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / – tests61≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7169

    Ventus Prime 3 K125: 60% × 61 + 40% × 70.6 = 65

    Aspec A349 BluEarth: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 68.7 = 68

    No road tests of treadwear for Aspec A349 BluEarth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  6. 75

    Handling (owners)

    Ventus Prime 3 K125 +13
    62
    Why this score
    SourceVentus Prime 3 K125Aspec A349 BluEarth
    Reviews found online7562
  7. 66

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceVentus Prime 3 K125Aspec A349 BluEarth
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / – tests66–
Scores at a glance
Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 vs Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Ventus Prime 3 K125Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth
Relative Score 78 61
Dry 85 58
Wet 80 59
Comfort 74 58
Noise 75 –
Treadwear 65 68
Handling (owners) 75 62
Efficiency 66 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

Ventus Prime 3 K125

± 8

Aspec A349 BluEarth

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ventus Prime 3 K125

Pros

  • Excellent dry road grip and braking performance
  • High value-for-money ratio compared to premium competitors
  • Comfortable ride quality with effective vibration absorption

Cons

  • Increased risk of hydroplaning as tread depth decreases
  • Accelerated tread wear on heavier vehicles or under high-torque conditions
  • Noise levels can increase noticeably after several thousand miles
All owner themes in the Ventus Prime 3 K125 review

Tire B Aspec A349 BluEarth

Pros

  • Impressive tread life and durability for an OEM tire
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Reliable handling and lateral grip in dry conditions

Cons

  • Poor traction and tendency to spin on wet surfaces
  • High price point compared to aftermarket competitors
  • Mediocre cornering ability and grip during aggressive maneuvers
All owner themes in the Aspec A349 BluEarth review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 B · Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available60—
Rim diameters15″ – 20″—

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125

Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth

Winner: Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 — better dry, wet and comfort. Pick the Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth if treadwear matters most to you. Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 scores 85 vs 58 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 scores 80 vs 59 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 scores 74 vs 58 on comfort.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 scores 75 vs 62 on handling.

Tire A · Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125
Tire B · Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ventus Prime 3 K125 or Aspec A349 BluEarth?

Which is better in the wet, Ventus Prime 3 K125 or Aspec A349 BluEarth?

Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125, 80 vs 59 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ventus Prime 3 K125 or Aspec A349 BluEarth?

Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125, 85 vs 58 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Ventus Prime 3 K125 or Aspec A349 BluEarth?

Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125, 74 vs 58 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Ventus Prime 3 K125 or Aspec A349 BluEarth?

Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth, 68 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology