Tests – · none yet Owners 77 · 7 reviews
Michelin Energy X2+ vs Yokohama BluEarth 1 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Energy X2+ is ahead, 75–70
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 3 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
74
Dry
Energy X2+ +371Why this score
Source Energy X2+ BluEarth 1 Reviews found online 77 72 -
78
Wet
Energy X2+ +573Why this score
Source Energy X2+ BluEarth 1 Reviews found online 81 74 -
72
Comfort
Energy X2+ +468Why this score
Source Energy X2+ BluEarth 1 Reviews found online 76 66 -
72
Treadwear
Energy X2+ +567Why this score
Source Energy X2+ BluEarth 1 Reviews found online 76 69 -
75
Handling
Energy X2+ +570Why this score
Source Energy X2+ BluEarth 1 Reviews found online 75 70
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Energy X2+ | Yokohama BluEarth 1 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 70 |
| Dry | 74 | 71 |
| Wet | 78 | 73 |
| Comfort | 72 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 72 | 67 |
| Handling | 75 | 70 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Energy X2+
BluEarth 1
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Energy X2+
Pros
- Exceptional wet weather performance and water displacement capabilities
- High durability and long tread life due to the hard compound construction
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Slightly firmer ride quality when using lower sidewall profiles
- Potential for increased road feedback depending on vehicle suspension setup
- Wet grip ratings are occasionally perceived as slightly lower than dry grip performance
Tire B BluEarth 1
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability
- Even wear patterns across the set
- Strong wet-weather confidence when new
Cons
- Noticeable decline in wet-weather grip as tread wears down
- Increased road noise as the tire ages
- Performance taper toward the end of the service life
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Energy X2+ | B · Yokohama BluEarth 1 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Michelin Energy X2+
Yokohama BluEarth 1
Winner: Michelin Energy X2+ — better wet, treadwear and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Michelin Energy X2+ scores 78 vs 73 on wet.
Michelin Energy X2+ scores 72 vs 67 on treadwear.
Michelin Energy X2+ scores 75 vs 70 on handling.
Michelin Energy X2+ scores 72 vs 68 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.