Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 30 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Goodyear Assurance Triplemax 2 vs Michelin Energy X2+ — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 30 + 7 owner reviews. How we score
Energy X2+ is ahead, 76–64
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 79 · 7 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
64
Dry
Energy X2+ +1175Why this score
Source Assurance Triplemax 2 Energy X2+ Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 62 79 Assurance Triplemax 2: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 61.8 = 64
Energy X2+: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 78.5 = 75
No road tests of dry for Assurance Triplemax 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Energy X2+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
65
Wet
Energy X2+ +1479Why this score
Source Assurance Triplemax 2 Energy X2+ Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 77 (est.) Reviews found online 63 81 Assurance Triplemax 2: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 63.2 = 65
Energy X2+: 60% × 76.6 (est.) + 40% × 81.4 = 79
No road tests of wet for Assurance Triplemax 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Energy X2+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
60
Comfort
Energy X2+ +1474Why this score
Source Assurance Triplemax 2 Energy X2+ Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 56 76 Assurance Triplemax 2: 40% × 66.7 (est.) + 60% × 55.7 = 60
Energy X2+: 40% × 70.5 (est.) + 60% × 76.3 = 74
No road tests of comfort for Assurance Triplemax 2 or Energy X2+. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
64
Treadwear
Energy X2+ +872Why this score
Source Assurance Triplemax 2 Energy X2+ Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 62 76 Assurance Triplemax 2: 60% × 64.8 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 64
Energy X2+: 60% × 69.6 (est.) + 40% × 76 = 72
No road tests of treadwear for Assurance Triplemax 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Energy X2+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
59
Handling (owners)
Energy X2+ +2180Why this score
Source Assurance Triplemax 2 Energy X2+ Reviews found online 59 80
Scores at a glance
| Category | Goodyear Assurance Triplemax 2 | Michelin Energy X2+ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 64 | 76 |
| Dry | 64 | 75 |
| Wet | 65 | 79 |
| Comfort | 60 | 74 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 72 |
| Handling (owners) | 59 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
64
/ 100
Assurance Triplemax 2
76
/ 100
Energy X2+
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Assurance Triplemax 2
Pros
- Superb dry and wet grip when new
- Excellent aquaplaning resistance and handling during heavy rain
- Good value for money compared to premium competitors
Cons
- Becomes significantly noisier as the tread wears down
- Stiff sidewalls leading to a harsh or crashy ride over rough surfaces
- Decline in wet grip and performance as the tire ages or wears past 50%
Tire B Energy X2+
Pros
- Exceptional wet weather performance and water displacement capabilities
- High durability and long tread life due to the hard compound construction
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Slightly firmer ride quality when using lower sidewall profiles
- Potential for increased road feedback depending on vehicle suspension setup
- Wet grip ratings are occasionally perceived as slightly lower than dry grip performance
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Assurance Triplemax 2 | B · Michelin Energy X2+ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 4 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 17″ | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
64
/ 100
Goodyear Assurance Triplemax 2
76
/ 100
Michelin Energy X2+
Winner: Michelin Energy X2+ — better handling, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Energy X2+ rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Energy X2+ scores 80 vs 59 on handling.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Energy X2+ scores 79 vs 65 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin Energy X2+ scores 74 vs 60 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin Energy X2+ scores 75 vs 64 on dry.
Tire A · Goodyear Assurance Triplemax 2
Tire B · Michelin Energy X2+
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Assurance Triplemax 2 or Energy X2+?
Which is better in the wet, Assurance Triplemax 2 or Energy X2+?
Michelin Energy X2+, 79 vs 65 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Assurance Triplemax 2 or Energy X2+?
Michelin Energy X2+, 75 vs 64 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Assurance Triplemax 2 or Energy X2+?
Michelin Energy X2+, 74 vs 60 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Assurance Triplemax 2 or Energy X2+?
Michelin Energy X2+, 72 vs 64 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology