Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 55 reviews
Michelin Energy XM2 vs BFGoodrich Traction T/A — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Energy XM2 is ahead, 67–58
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 54 · 4 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
65
Dry
Energy XM2 +857Why this score
Source Energy XM2 Traction T/A Reviews found online 64 52 -
68
Wet
Energy XM2 +761Why this score
Source Energy XM2 Traction T/A Reviews found online 68 58 -
66
Comfort
Energy XM2 +1353Why this score
Source Energy XM2 Traction T/A Reviews found online 63 37 -
69
Treadwear
Energy XM2 +663Why this score
Source Energy XM2 Traction T/A Reviews found online 71 62 -
65
Handling
Energy XM2 +1550Why this score
Source Energy XM2 Traction T/A Reviews found online 65 50
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Energy XM2 | BFGoodrich Traction T/A |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 58 |
| Dry | 65 | 57 |
| Wet | 68 | 61 |
| Comfort | 66 | 53 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 63 |
| Handling | 65 | 50 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Energy XM2
Traction T/A
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Energy XM2
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability
- Strong puncture resistance
- Reliable dry and wet grip for daily driving
Cons
- Increased road noise as the tire wears
- Soft sidewalls can feel less responsive during spirited driving
- Premium price point compared to competitors
Tire B Traction T/A
Pros
- Competitive pricing compared to premium alternatives
- Strong traction and stability in winter conditions
- Good tread wear longevity
Cons
- Excessive and intrusive road noise
- Poor wet-weather grip and handling
- Audible squealing during cornering
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Energy XM2 | B · BFGoodrich Traction T/A |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | High Performance All Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 3 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 16″ | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Michelin Energy XM2
BFGoodrich Traction T/A
Winner: Michelin Energy XM2 — better handling, comfort and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Michelin Energy XM2 scores 65 vs 50 on handling.
Michelin Energy XM2 scores 66 vs 53 on comfort.
Michelin Energy XM2 scores 65 vs 57 on dry.
Michelin Energy XM2 scores 68 vs 61 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.