Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 55 reviews
Michelin Energy XM2 vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
BluEarth Es ES32 leads, 70–67 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 60 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
65
Dry
BluEarth Es ES32 +469Why this score
Source Energy XM2 BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 64 70 -
68
Wet
BluEarth Es ES32 +472Why this score
Source Energy XM2 BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 68 73 -
66
Comfort
BluEarth Es ES32 +672Why this score
Source Energy XM2 BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 62 74 -
69
Treadwear
Energy XM2 +465Why this score
Source Energy XM2 BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 71 65 -
65
Handling
BluEarth Es ES32 +873Why this score
Source Energy XM2 BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 65 73
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Energy XM2 | Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 70 |
| Dry | 65 | 69 |
| Wet | 68 | 72 |
| Comfort | 66 | 72 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 65 |
| Handling | 65 | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Energy XM2
BluEarth Es ES32
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Energy XM2
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability
- Strong puncture resistance
- Reliable dry and wet grip for daily driving
Cons
- Increased road noise as the tire wears
- Soft sidewalls can feel less responsive during spirited driving
- Premium price point compared to competitors
Tire B BluEarth Es ES32
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
- Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
- Reliable dry-weather traction and handling
Cons
- Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
- Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Energy XM2 | B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 3 | 64 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 16″ | 13″ – 18″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Michelin Energy XM2
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Winner: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better handling, comfort and dry. Pick the Michelin Energy XM2 if treadwear matters most to you.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 73 vs 65 on handling.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 72 vs 66 on comfort.
Michelin Energy XM2 scores 69 vs 65 on treadwear.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 69 vs 65 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.