Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 55 reviews
Michelin Energy XM2 vs Continental PremiumContact 6 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
PremiumContact 6 is ahead, 79–67
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 82 · 42 tests Owners 73 · 2,329 reviews
“I switched out my 20” good year’s that came with the car for a set of continental premium contact 6 POL a month ago before a vacation trip. They were excellent in heavy rain. Can recommend. EX30 2024 TM Ultra.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
65
Dry
PremiumContact 6 +1782Why this score
Source Energy XM2 PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) – 86 Reviews found online 64 76 -
68
Wet
PremiumContact 6 +1583Why this score
Source Energy XM2 PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) – 87 Reviews found online 68 78 -
–
Snow
No comparison73Why this score
Source Energy XM2 PremiumContact 6 Reviews found online – 76 -
66
Comfort
PremiumContact 6 +1177Why this score
Source Energy XM2 PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) – 82 Reviews found online 63 71 -
–
Noise
No comparison52Why this score
Source Energy XM2 PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) – 39 Reviews found online – 71 -
69
Treadwear
PremiumContact 6 +776Why this score
Source Energy XM2 PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) – 84 Reviews found online 71 65 -
65
Handling
PremiumContact 6 +1075Why this score
Source Energy XM2 PremiumContact 6 Reviews found online 65 75
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Energy XM2 | Continental PremiumContact 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 79 |
| Dry | 65 | 82 |
| Wet | 68 | 83 |
| Snow | – | 73 |
| Comfort | 66 | 77 |
| Noise | – | 52 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 76 |
| Handling | 65 | 75 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Energy XM2
PremiumContact 6
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Energy XM2
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability
- Strong puncture resistance
- Reliable dry and wet grip for daily driving
Cons
- Increased road noise as the tire wears
- Soft sidewalls can feel less responsive during spirited driving
- Premium price point compared to competitors
Tire B PremiumContact 6
Pros
- Exceptional grip and short braking distances on both dry and wet road surfaces
- Precise steering response and predictable handling near the limit
- High level of high-speed stability and driver confidence
Cons
- Faster tread wear and shorter lifespan reported by spirited drivers
- Increased road noise and harshness on coarse or rough asphalt
- Softer sidewalls can result in less immediate turn-in sharpness compared to dedicated ultra-high-performance tires
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Michelin Energy XM2
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Continental PremiumContact 6
Community opinion on the Continental PremiumContact 6 is largely positive, highlighting its exceptional wet grip, reliable braking performance, and balanced ride comfort compared to stiffer alternatives. While some note high replacement costs or faster wear on heavy electric vehicles, drivers generally praise the tire as a worthy investment for safety and all-around performance.
“Continental PremiumContact 6 Bought in 2020. new, first picture is front, second is back, I rotated them 2 years ago. I see some dry rot, but they could be good for this and another year? Škoda Octavia 1.9TDI 110hp, tire size 195-65-15”
“My continental premium contact 6’s getting to end or ? I am using these for the last 3 years and drove 46K km on them. Treadwear indicator for 3mm is getting very close. Should I rush or let them run for maybe another 5-10K ? Read more”
“Well having 4 tyres to change on the Polestar 2 at the same time - and the OE spec Continental Premium Contact 6 tyres being $1020 each!!! (wtf are they made from?) I went with Pirelli Dragon Sports - same 99YXL weight rating - higher speed rating. Noise - no difference at all. Efficiency - nothing I can see from a week of driving. The car's trip average kWh/100km hasn't budged. Wear? Well the Contis lasted 22k km on the front and 44k km on the rear so who knows? Couldn't be worse, could it? Traction - same in the dry and I haven't noticed any difference in the wet but haven't been hooning it...Oh - and they were $290 each balanced and fitted.”
Based on 10 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Energy XM2 | B · Continental PremiumContact 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 3 | 113 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 16″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 8 - 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 280 A - AA A |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 - 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Michelin Energy XM2
Continental PremiumContact 6
Winner: Continental PremiumContact 6 — better dry, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 82 vs 65 on dry.
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 83 vs 68 on wet.
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 77 vs 66 on comfort.
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 75 vs 65 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.