Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 55 reviews
Michelin Energy XM2 vs Yokohama BluEarth AE50 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Energy XM2 is ahead, 67–62
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 72 · 2 tests Owners 54 · 36 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
65
Dry
Energy XM2 +164Why this score
Source Energy XM2 BluEarth AE50 Professional tests (TWG score) – 71 Reviews found online 64 53 -
68
Wet
Energy XM2 +167Why this score
Source Energy XM2 BluEarth AE50 Professional tests (TWG score) – 72 Reviews found online 68 60 -
66
Comfort
Level66Why this score
Source Energy XM2 BluEarth AE50 Professional tests (TWG score) – 73 Reviews found online 62 56 -
–
Noise
No comparison69Why this score
Source Energy XM2 BluEarth AE50 Professional tests (TWG score) – 71 -
69
Treadwear
Energy XM2 +1455Why this score
Source Energy XM2 BluEarth AE50 Reviews found online 71 48 -
65
Handling
Energy XM2 +857Why this score
Source Energy XM2 BluEarth AE50 Reviews found online 65 57
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Energy XM2 | Yokohama BluEarth AE50 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 62 |
| Dry | 65 | 64 |
| Wet | 68 | 67 |
| Comfort | 66 | 66 |
| Noise | – | 69 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 55 |
| Handling | 65 | 57 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Energy XM2
BluEarth AE50
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Energy XM2
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability
- Strong puncture resistance
- Reliable dry and wet grip for daily driving
Cons
- Increased road noise as the tire wears
- Soft sidewalls can feel less responsive during spirited driving
- Premium price point compared to competitors
Tire B BluEarth AE50
Pros
- Strong wet and dry road grip for daily commuting
- High levels of ride comfort and smoothness
- Good value for money compared to premium competitors
Cons
- Rapid and premature tread wear reported by many users
- Significant increase in road noise as the tire ages
- Soft sidewalls leading to vague steering feedback and poor cornering stability
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Energy XM2 | B · Yokohama BluEarth AE50 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 3 | 28 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 16″ | 14″ – 18″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Michelin Energy XM2
Yokohama BluEarth AE50
Winner: Michelin Energy XM2 — better treadwear and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Michelin Energy XM2 scores 69 vs 55 on treadwear.
Michelin Energy XM2 scores 65 vs 57 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.