Tests 72 · 2 tests Owners 50 · 37 reviews
Best test result: #6 of 20 in 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test (dry handling)
Head-to-head
Updated
Yokohama BluEarth AE50 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 14 road tests and 37 + 2,521 owner reviews. How we score
Ventus Prime 4 is ahead, 75–61
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 77 · 14 tests Owners 71 · 2,521 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (dry handling)
“Simbolul cu mașina și fulgerul de pe Hankook Ventus Prime 4 arată că anvelopa e compatibilă și cu mașini electrice (EV), nu că e destinată exclusiv lor. Poate fi folosită fără probleme și pe mașini cu motor termic.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
62
Dry
Ventus Prime 4 +1779Why this score
Source BluEarth AE50 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 12 tests 72 83 Reviews found online 48 73 BluEarth AE50: 60% × 71.6 + 40% × 48.4 = 62
Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 82.7 + 40% × 73 = 79
-
66
Wet
Ventus Prime 4 +1177Why this score
Source BluEarth AE50 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 13 tests 72 79 Reviews found online 56 75 BluEarth AE50: 60% × 71.7 + 40% × 56.4 = 66
Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 78.6 + 40% × 74.5 = 77
-
59
Comfort
Ventus Prime 4 +1069Why this score
Source BluEarth AE50 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests 72 70 Reviews found online 51 67 BluEarth AE50: 40% × 72.2 + 60% × 50.8 = 59
Ventus Prime 4: 40% × 70.3 + 60% × 67.4 = 69
-
69
Noise
BluEarth AE50 +861Why this score
Source BluEarth AE50 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 8 tests 71 58 Reviews found online ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) BluEarth AE50: 60% × 71.1 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 69
Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 57.6 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 61
No owner ratings of noise for BluEarth AE50 or Ventus Prime 4. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
52
Treadwear
Ventus Prime 4 +2274Why this score
Source BluEarth AE50 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests ≈ 58 (est.) 79 Reviews found online 43 67 BluEarth AE50: 60% × 58.1 (est.) + 40% × 43.1 = 52
Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 78.5 + 40% × 66.9 = 74
No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth AE50. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
53
Handling (owners)
Ventus Prime 4 +1972Why this score
Source BluEarth AE50 Ventus Prime 4 Reviews found online 53 72 -
78
Efficiency
Ventus Prime 4 +684Why this score
Source BluEarth AE50 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 9 tests 78 84
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama BluEarth AE50 | Hankook Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 61 | 75 |
| Dry | 62 | 79 |
| Wet | 66 | 77 |
| Comfort | 59 | 69 |
| Noise | 69 | 61 |
| Treadwear | 52 | 74 |
| Handling (owners) | 53 | 72 |
| Efficiency | 78 | 84 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
61
/ 100
BluEarth AE50
75
/ 100
Ventus Prime 4
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | BluEarth AE50 | Ventus Prime 4 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 92% #18/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test | 92% #16/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% #6/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test | 99% #6/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 80% #8/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test | 90% #4/14 · 2025 Summer and All Season Combined Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 86% #16/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test | 91% #16/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 88% #12/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test | 87% #14/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 91% #14/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test | 99% #2/8 · 2025 Moottori Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) | Wet | 29% #13/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test | 90% #4/14 · 2025 Summer and All Season Combined Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 88% #6/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test | 95% #4/7 · 2025 Die ReifenTester Summer Touring Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 99% #8/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test | 99% #4/8 · 2025 Moottori Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 87% #3/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test | 95% #10/14 · 2025 Summer and All Season Combined Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 55% #16/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test | 69% #9/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #11/20 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test | #11/16 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A BluEarth AE50
Pros
- Strong wet and dry road grip for daily commuting
- High levels of ride comfort and smoothness
- Good value for money compared to premium competitors
Cons
- Rapid and premature tread wear reported by many users
- Significant increase in road noise as the tire ages
- Soft sidewalls leading to vague steering feedback and poor cornering stability
Tire B Ventus Prime 4
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry grip providing high confidence
- Significantly reduced road noise and smooth, quiet ride quality
- Competitively priced offering great value compared to top-tier premium brands
Cons
- Accelerated tread wear reported by some users, leading to shorter overall tire life
- Noticeable decrease in wet traction and grip as the tread wears down past the halfway mark
- Stiffer sidewalls can translate to a firmer ride or reduced comfort on rough surfaces
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Yokohama BluEarth AE50
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Community opinion on the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is largely positive, with drivers viewing it as a comfortable, quiet, and capable touring tire. Users frequently praise its strong dry and wet performance alongside its compelling price-to-performance ratio compared to premium alternatives like Michelin. Some uncertainties exist regarding long-term tread wear and slight fuel economy impacts, but owners generally report satisfactory everyday reliability.
r/TireQuestions
·1 upvote ·2026-10-09
“Found a cut on one of my tires, is it 100% cooked? Three month old Hankook Ventus Prime 4 and I found a cut/split. It’s holding air fine but it is cooked?”
r/TyreReviews
·6 upvotes ·2024-03-16
“Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs Kumho Ecsta HS52? Hey there! Went to this reddit after reading a lot of reviews on the website, a bit of a newbie in general. I have read about many models and settled on 2 possible ones due to pricing and availability in my country (not looking for any other options). In my price range and requirements I've settled on Ventus Prime 4 initially (50% cheaper than Primacy that my car came stock with), but have also seen some good stuff said about HS52. I was quite settled on the first one since it scored very well in 2022 Autobild review, but now that 2024 came out a lot of numbers are completely different (predicted tread life alone took a huge dive) and Hankook is now 4 positions lower than Kumho. To add to this, Hankook was only 10% more expensive thank Kumho in my country, but now there was a price drop and and now there is 20% price difference, so set of Kumhos comes out noticeable cheaper. Spec wise they seems very similar with some trade-offs in different departments. I'm not really looking to save as much money as possible, but with latest reviews I'm not sure if there is any improvement worth paying for. Any thoughts? Thanks. Read more”
r/croautomobili
·1 upvote ·2026-09-23
“Top top top guma, stavio prosle godine kad sam kupio auto, odmah na Kupres isao, snijega i leda bilo dosta, ali izdale me nisu Imam i ljetne hankook ventus prime 4 isto odlicna guma”
Top themes
#value for money#comfort and low noise#wet and dry grip#comparison with premium brands#tread longevity questions#touring versus sports handling
Based on 41 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama BluEarth AE50 | B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
| Sizes available | 28 | 66 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 18″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| UTQG | — | 200 - 420 A A |
| Sizes in common | 20 | 20 |
Which one should you actually buy?
61
/ 100
Yokohama BluEarth AE50
75
/ 100
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Winner: Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — better treadwear, handling and dry. Pick the Yokohama BluEarth AE50 if noise matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 74 vs 52 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 72 vs 53 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 79 vs 62 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 77 vs 66 on wet.
Tire A · Yokohama BluEarth AE50
Tire B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
BluEarth AE50 or Ventus Prime 4?
Which is better in the wet, BluEarth AE50 or Ventus Prime 4?
Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 77 vs 66 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, BluEarth AE50 or Ventus Prime 4?
Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 79 vs 62 on our dry score.
Which is quieter, BluEarth AE50 or Ventus Prime 4?
Yokohama BluEarth AE50, 69 vs 61 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, BluEarth AE50 or Ventus Prime 4?
Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 69 vs 59 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, BluEarth AE50 or Ventus Prime 4?
Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 74 vs 52 on our treadwear score.
Which rolls more easily, BluEarth AE50 or Ventus Prime 4?
Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 84 vs 78 on our efficiency score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology