Head-to-head Updated

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 vs Yokohama BluEarth AE50 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 4 + 2 road tests and 2,195 + 37 owner reviews. How we score

ADVAN Fleva V701 is ahead, 70–61

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Tire AYokohama

ADVAN Fleva V701

Summer

± 6

Tests 73 · 4 tests Owners 57 · 2,195 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”

Yokohama BluEarth AE50
Tire BYokohama

BluEarth AE50

Summer

± 6

Tests 72 · 2 tests Owners 50 · 37 reviews

Best test result: #6 of 20 in 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test (dry handling)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +12
    62
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Fleva V701BluEarth AE50
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 2 tests7872
    Reviews found online6848

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 77.7 + 40% × 67.5 = 74

    BluEarth AE50: 60% × 71.6 + 40% × 48.4 = 62

  2. 67

    Wet

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +1
    66
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Fleva V701BluEarth AE50
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 2 tests7072
    Reviews found online6456

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 70 + 40% × 63.7 = 67

    BluEarth AE50: 60% × 71.7 + 40% × 56.4 = 66

  3. 36

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Fleva V701BluEarth AE50
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 52 (est.)–
    Reviews found online12–

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 52 (est.) + 40% × 12.3 = 36

    No road tests of snow for ADVAN Fleva V701. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 62

    Comfort

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +3
    59
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Fleva V701BluEarth AE50
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests6272
    Reviews found online6151

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 40% × 62.4 + 60% × 60.9 = 62

    BluEarth AE50: 40% × 72.2 + 60% × 50.8 = 59

  5. 69

    Noise

    Level
    69
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Fleva V701BluEarth AE50
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 2 tests7571
    Reviews found online60≈ 66 (est.)

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 74.6 + 40% × 59.7 = 69

    BluEarth AE50: 60% × 71.1 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 69

    No owner ratings of noise for BluEarth AE50. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 69

    Treadwear

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +17
    52
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Fleva V701BluEarth AE50
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests75≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online5943

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 75.2 + 40% × 59.3 = 69

    BluEarth AE50: 60% × 58.1 (est.) + 40% × 43.1 = 52

    No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth AE50. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 72

    Handling (owners)

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +19
    53
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Fleva V701BluEarth AE50
    Reviews found online7253
  8. 71

    Efficiency

    BluEarth AE50 +7
    78
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Fleva V701BluEarth AE50
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 2 tests7178
Scores at a glance
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 vs Yokohama BluEarth AE50: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryYokohama ADVAN Fleva V701Yokohama BluEarth AE50
Relative Score 70 61
Dry 74 62
Wet 67 66
Snow 36 –
Comfort 62 59
Noise 69 69
Treadwear 69 52
Handling (owners) 72 53
Efficiency 71 78

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

ADVAN Fleva V701

± 6

BluEarth AE50

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryADVAN Fleva V701BluEarth AE50ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 97% #8/45 · 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout 92% #18/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 98% #14/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 99% #6/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 92% #15/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 86% #16/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 87% #21/45 · 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout 88% #12/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 95% #16/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 91% #14/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Comfort (tester's mark) Comfort 56% #17/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 88% #6/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Noise Noise 100% #2/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 99% #8/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 82% #7/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 87% #3/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 71% #17/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 55% #16/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall #6/22 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires #11/20 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ADVAN Fleva V701

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
  • Noticeably quieter and more comfortable than many competing UHP tires
  • Precise steering response and good road feedback

Cons

  • Faster-than-average tread wear reported by aggressive drivers
  • Some complaints regarding soft sidewalls leading to initial turn-in delay or tramlining
  • Occasional reports of elevated road noise depending on the vehicle and road surface
All owner themes in the ADVAN Fleva V701 review

Tire B BluEarth AE50

Pros

  • Strong wet and dry road grip for daily commuting
  • High levels of ride comfort and smoothness
  • Good value for money compared to premium competitors

Cons

  • Rapid and premature tread wear reported by many users
  • Significant increase in road noise as the tire ages
  • Soft sidewalls leading to vague steering feedback and poor cornering stability
All owner themes in the BluEarth AE50 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Positive

The community generally views the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 as a strong, high-value summer tire ideal for daily driving, spirited backroad runs, and wet weather conditions. Drivers praise its sharp turn-in, stiff sidewalls, and dependable grip compared to other budget or mid-tier alternatives, though some debate its lifespan and how it stacks up against premium options like Michelin.

r/Civic_Type_R ·3 upvotes ·2026-09-05

“Suggestiona on tyres Hi everyone, Just wanted to ask if you guys ever had Yokohama Advan Fleva V701. My FK2 has nearly 400bhp and I’m not using it daily anymore as I want it to preserve the baby. My drive is a bit aggressive occasionally but nothing crazy or track day as I don’t have the time. I would like to know if you guys ever had this specific type of tyre. What you think about? They’re actually good? I wouldn’t like to buy again the Michelin pilot sport 4s which I found absolutely rubbish. I found those yoko for the decent price of 98£ each. So I buy it or should I move to Pirelli PZero pZ4 sport ?”

r/mr2 ·2 upvotes ·2025-05-24

“Yokohama advan fleva v701? Currently looking at stock sizes for my 99 MRS and the v701s are the only decent set I can find. I live in Canada and I was planning on ordering them for next week, and just thought to do one more validation check before driving out to Bellingham. Pretty new to picking out my own tires, trying to also stay within 550-600usd or maxish 800-850cad including tax if possible.”

r/TyreReviews ·2 upvotes ·2026-06-06

“Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 in 2026 Do they make sense today? I’d put them on a hatchback (1300kg) and I usually drive up to 180-200 km/h with quick accelerations and curves in my daily. Weather is usually sunny, but sometimes it rains. Are them still a safe and a good choice, or are there some other brands that should result better for my driving style (and for my 215/45 r18 rims)? Thanks in advance.”

Top themes
#Daily driving comfort#Wet and dry grip#Spirited backroad handling#Value for money#Tire wear and lifespan#Sidewall stiffness

Based on 22 community posts

Tire B

Yokohama BluEarth AE50

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 B · Yokohama BluEarth AE50
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available7028
Rim diameters15″ – 20″14″ – 18″
Tread depth9/32″—
UTQG300 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—
Sizes in common1515

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Yokohama BluEarth AE50

Winner: Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — better handling, treadwear and dry. Pick the Yokohama BluEarth AE50 if efficiency matters most to you.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 72 vs 53 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 69 vs 52 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 74 vs 62 on dry.

Pick tire B You want lower fuel or energy use

Yokohama BluEarth AE50 scores 78 vs 71 on efficiency.

Tire A · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth AE50

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ADVAN Fleva V701 or BluEarth AE50?

Which is better in the wet, ADVAN Fleva V701 or BluEarth AE50?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 66 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, ADVAN Fleva V701 or BluEarth AE50?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 74 vs 62 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, ADVAN Fleva V701 or BluEarth AE50?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 69 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, ADVAN Fleva V701 or BluEarth AE50?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 62 vs 59 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ADVAN Fleva V701 or BluEarth AE50?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 69 vs 52 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, ADVAN Fleva V701 or BluEarth AE50?

Yokohama BluEarth AE50, 78 vs 71 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology