Tests – · none yet Owners 57 · 42 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Michelin Energy vs Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 42 + 11 owner reviews. How we score
BluEarth XT AE61 is ahead, 71–60
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 66 · 2 tests Owners 78 · 11 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2025 EV Tyre Test (noise)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
55
Dry
BluEarth XT AE61 +2075Why this score
Source Energy BluEarth XT AE61 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 60 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 48 83 Energy: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 48.4 = 55
BluEarth XT AE61: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 82.8 = 75
No road tests of dry for Energy. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
61
Wet
BluEarth XT AE61 +1172Why this score
Source Energy BluEarth XT AE61 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 63 (est.) 68 Reviews found online 57 80 Energy: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 57.4 = 61
BluEarth XT AE61: 60% × 67.6 + 40% × 79.5 = 72
No road tests of wet for Energy. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
65
Comfort
BluEarth XT AE61 +166Why this score
Source Energy BluEarth XT AE61 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 65 Reviews found online 60 68 Energy: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 60.2 = 65
BluEarth XT AE61: 60% × 64.7 + 40% × 68.1 = 66
No road tests of comfort for Energy. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison79Why this score
Source Energy BluEarth XT AE61 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests – 87 Reviews found online – ≈ 67 (est.) BluEarth XT AE61: 60% × 86.6 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 79
No owner ratings of noise for BluEarth XT AE61. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
67
Treadwear
Energy +562Why this score
Source Energy BluEarth XT AE61 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 53 Reviews found online 67 75 Energy: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 67.3 = 67
BluEarth XT AE61: 60% × 52.8 + 40% × 75.4 = 62
No road tests of treadwear for Energy. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
51
Handling (owners)
BluEarth XT AE61 +2980Why this score
Source Energy BluEarth XT AE61 Reviews found online 51 80
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Energy | Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 60 | 71 |
| Dry | 55 | 75 |
| Wet | 61 | 72 |
| Comfort | 65 | 66 |
| Noise | – | 79 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 62 |
| Handling (owners) | 51 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
60
/ 100
Energy
71
/ 100
BluEarth XT AE61
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Energy
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Noticeable improvements in fuel economy
- Low road noise and comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Lack of steering feedback and road feel
- Inconsistent or poor grip in wet conditions
- High price point relative to competitors
Tire B BluEarth XT AE61
Pros
- Excellent grip and braking performance in both wet and dry conditions
- Responsive and sharp steering handling
- High stability during cornering due to rigid sidewall construction
Cons
- Noticeable cabin noise, particularly on aged or rough road surfaces
- Stiff sidewall construction results in a harsh ride on bumpy or unpaved roads
- Comfort levels are highly dependent on road surface quality
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Energy | B · Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | — | 38 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 20″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
60
/ 100
Michelin Energy
71
/ 100
Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61
Winner: Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 — better handling, dry and wet. Pick the Michelin Energy if treadwear matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 scores 80 vs 51 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 scores 75 vs 55 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 scores 72 vs 61 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Energy scores 67 vs 62 on treadwear.
Tire A · Michelin Energy
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Energy or BluEarth XT AE61?
Which is better in the wet, Energy or BluEarth XT AE61?
Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61, 72 vs 61 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Energy or BluEarth XT AE61?
Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61, 75 vs 55 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Energy or BluEarth XT AE61?
Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 66 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Energy or BluEarth XT AE61?
Michelin Energy, 67 vs 62 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology