Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Michelin LTX A/T2 vs Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 7 + 12 owner reviews. How we score

LTX A/T2 is ahead, 75–61

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin LTX A/T2
Tire AMichelin

LTX A/T2

All-Terrain tire

Provisional

Tests – · 1 test Owners 74 · 7 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 18 in 2022 Consumer Reports All Terrain Truck Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    LTX A/T2 +12
    61
    Why this score
    SourceLTX A/T2Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online7658

    LTX A/T2: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 76 = 73

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 61

    No road tests of dry for LTX A/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 74

    Wet

    LTX A/T2 +17
    57
    Why this score
    SourceLTX A/T2Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online7653

    LTX A/T2: 60% × 73.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.1 = 74

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 60.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.9 = 57

    No road tests of wet for LTX A/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 71

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceLTX A/T2Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)–
    Reviews found online71–

    LTX A/T2: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 71 = 71

    No road tests of snow for LTX A/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 71

    Comfort

    LTX A/T2 +6
    65
    Why this score
    SourceLTX A/T2Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7362

    LTX A/T2: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 72.5 = 71

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 61.8 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for LTX A/T2 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 69

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceLTX A/T2Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online71–

    LTX A/T2: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.3 = 69

    No road tests of noise for LTX A/T2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 78

    Treadwear

    LTX A/T2 +13
    65
    Why this score
    SourceLTX A/T2Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests82≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online7364

    LTX A/T2: 60% × 81.8 + 40% × 73.2 = 78

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 64 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 78

    Handling (owners)

    LTX A/T2 +20
    58
    Why this score
    SourceLTX A/T2Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Reviews found online7858
Scores at a glance
Michelin LTX A/T2 vs Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin LTX A/T2Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Relative Score 75 61
Dry 73 61
Wet 74 57
Snow 71 –
Comfort 71 65
Noise 69 –
Treadwear 78 65
Handling (owners) 78 58

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

LTX A/T2

Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A LTX A/T2

Pros

  • Exceptional tread longevity and overall durability
  • Reliable wet and dry road traction
  • Improved steering response and ride comfort compared to competitors

Cons

  • Premium price point
  • Performance in deep snow and ice is considered adequate but not class-leading
  • Rubber compounds may become slippery or lose traction as the tire reaches advanced age
All owner themes in the LTX A/T2 review

Tire B Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

Pros

  • Extremely quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Improved fuel economy and low rolling resistance
  • Adequate dry road grip and handling

Cons

  • Dangerous or unreliable wet weather traction, particularly lateral grip and cornering
  • Prone to wheel spin on damp or wet surfaces
  • Accelerated or uneven tread wear reported on certain crossover and SUV models
All owner themes in the Geolandar G055 Blue Earth review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin LTX A/T2 B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
CategoryAll-Terrain tireSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin LTX A/T2

Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

Winner: Michelin LTX A/T2 — better handling, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin LTX A/T2 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin LTX A/T2 scores 78 vs 58 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin LTX A/T2 scores 74 vs 57 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Michelin LTX A/T2 scores 78 vs 65 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin LTX A/T2 scores 73 vs 61 on dry.

Tire A · Michelin LTX A/T2
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

LTX A/T2 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Which is better in the wet, LTX A/T2 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Michelin LTX A/T2, 74 vs 57 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, LTX A/T2 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Michelin LTX A/T2, 73 vs 61 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, LTX A/T2 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Michelin LTX A/T2, 71 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, LTX A/T2 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Michelin LTX A/T2, 78 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology