Tests – · none yet Owners 48 · 9 reviews
Michelin Pilot HX MXM4 vs Michelin Energy Saver A/S — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Too close to call: Pilot HX MXM4 and Energy Saver A/S are level at 55.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 49 · 10 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
57
Dry
Pilot HX MXM4 +156Why this score
Source Pilot HX MXM4 Energy Saver A/S Reviews found online 51 49 -
55
Wet
Pilot HX MXM4 +154Why this score
Source Pilot HX MXM4 Energy Saver A/S Reviews found online 50 48 -
54
Snow
Level54Why this score
Source Pilot HX MXM4 Energy Saver A/S Reviews found online 43 44 -
62
Comfort
Pilot HX MXM4 +260Why this score
Source Pilot HX MXM4 Energy Saver A/S Reviews found online 54 51 -
60
Noise
Energy Saver A/S +161Why this score
Source Pilot HX MXM4 Energy Saver A/S Reviews found online 50 52 -
52
Treadwear
Energy Saver A/S +557Why this score
Source Pilot HX MXM4 Energy Saver A/S Reviews found online 43 51 -
48
Handling
Energy Saver A/S +250Why this score
Source Pilot HX MXM4 Energy Saver A/S Reviews found online 48 50
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Pilot HX MXM4 | Michelin Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 55 | 55 |
| Dry | 57 | 56 |
| Wet | 55 | 54 |
| Snow | 54 | 54 |
| Comfort | 62 | 60 |
| Noise | 60 | 61 |
| Treadwear | 52 | 57 |
| Handling | 48 | 50 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Pilot HX MXM4
Energy Saver A/S
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Pilot HX MXM4
Pros
- Acceptable tread life for some users under specific driving conditions
- Generally comfortable ride quality when new
- Reliable performance for moderate, dry-weather driving
Cons
- Poor traction and safety concerns on wet surfaces
- Inadequate performance in winter conditions despite M+S rating
- Reports of sidewall tearing and tread delamination
Tire B Energy Saver A/S
Pros
- High fuel economy and rolling efficiency
- Potential for high mileage in specific driving conditions
- Reliable dry weather traction for some users
Cons
- Significant hydroplaning tendencies in wet conditions
- Inconsistent tread life, with reports of premature wear
- Excessive road noise and audible squealing during cornering
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Pilot HX MXM4 | B · Michelin Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Michelin Pilot HX MXM4
Michelin Energy Saver A/S
Too close to call: Michelin Pilot HX MXM4 and Michelin Energy Saver A/S are within 2 points overall. Michelin Energy Saver A/S is stronger on treadwear.
Michelin Energy Saver A/S scores 57 vs 52 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.