Tests – · none yet Owners 66 · 10 reviews
Yokohama Parada Spec-2 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Michelin Pilot Sport 3 vs Yokohama Parada Spec-2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 10 + 118 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Pilot Sport 3 67, Parada Spec-2 66.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 118 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
70
Dry
Parada Spec-2 +373Why this score
Source Pilot Sport 3 Parada Spec-2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 72 75 Pilot Sport 3: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 70
Parada Spec-2: 60% × 70.7 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 73
No road tests of dry for Pilot Sport 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Parada Spec-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
70
Wet
Pilot Sport 3 +961Why this score
Source Pilot Sport 3 Parada Spec-2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 70 58 Pilot Sport 3: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 70.4 = 70
Parada Spec-2: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 57.6 = 61
No road tests of wet for Pilot Sport 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Parada Spec-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
65
Comfort
Level65Why this score
Source Pilot Sport 3 Parada Spec-2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 61 62 Pilot Sport 3: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 61.4 = 65
Parada Spec-2: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 61.5 = 65
No road tests of comfort for Pilot Sport 3 or Parada Spec-2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
66
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Pilot Sport 3 Parada Spec-2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 63 – Pilot Sport 3: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 63 = 66
No road tests of noise for Pilot Sport 3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
61
Treadwear
Parada Spec-2 +162Why this score
Source Pilot Sport 3 Parada Spec-2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 58 59 Pilot Sport 3: 60% × 63.2 (est.) + 40% × 57.6 = 61
Parada Spec-2: 60% × 63.5 (est.) + 40% × 58.7 = 62
No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Sport 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Parada Spec-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
65
Handling (owners)
Parada Spec-2 +469Why this score
Source Pilot Sport 3 Parada Spec-2 Reviews found online 65 69
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Pilot Sport 3 | Yokohama Parada Spec-2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 66 |
| Dry | 70 | 73 |
| Wet | 70 | 61 |
| Comfort | 65 | 65 |
| Noise | 66 | – |
| Treadwear | 61 | 62 |
| Handling (owners) | 65 | 69 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Pilot Sport 3
Parada Spec-2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Pilot Sport 3
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B Parada Spec-2
Pros
- Outstanding dry grip and cornering stability
- Excellent value for money and aggressive tread design
- Precise steering feedback and predictable breakaway limits in the dry
Cons
- Poor wet-weather traction and high risk of aquaplaning
- Fast tread wear due to the soft rubber compound
- Noticeable road noise at cruising speeds
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Pilot Sport 3 | B · Yokohama Parada Spec-2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer tire | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 10 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 19″ | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Michelin Pilot Sport 3
Yokohama Parada Spec-2
Too close to call: Michelin Pilot Sport 3 and Yokohama Parada Spec-2 are within 2 points overall. Michelin Pilot Sport 3 is stronger on wet. Yokohama Parada Spec-2 is stronger on dry. Michelin Pilot Sport 3 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin Pilot Sport 3 scores 70 vs 61 on wet.
Yokohama Parada Spec-2 scores 73 vs 70 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Pilot Sport 3 or Parada Spec-2?
Which is better in the wet, Pilot Sport 3 or Parada Spec-2?
Michelin Pilot Sport 3, 70 vs 61 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Pilot Sport 3 or Parada Spec-2?
Yokohama Parada Spec-2, 73 vs 70 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Pilot Sport 3 or Parada Spec-2?
Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 65 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Pilot Sport 3 or Parada Spec-2?
Neither, by our numbers: 61 vs 62 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology