Yokohama Parada Spec-2 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs Yokohama Parada Spec-2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 14 + 0 road tests and 8,168 + 118 owner reviews. How we score

Ecsta PS71 is ahead, 73–66

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Ecsta PS71
Tire AKumho

Ecsta PS71

Summer

Tests 67 · 14 tests Owners 69 · 8,168 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 18 in 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)

“Those are Kumho Ecsta PS71s, thread width is supposed to be 245mm, the actual one is hardly 235. How so?”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 75

    Dry

    Ecsta PS71 +2
    73
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS71Parada Spec-2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / – tests77≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7175

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 77.3 + 40% × 71 = 75

    Parada Spec-2: 60% × 70.7 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 73

    No road tests of dry for Parada Spec-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 84

    Wet

    Ecsta PS71 +23
    61
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS71Parada Spec-2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 13 / – tests91≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online7358

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 90.9 + 40% × 73.1 = 84

    Parada Spec-2: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 57.6 = 61

    No road tests of wet for Parada Spec-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 71

    Comfort

    Ecsta PS71 +6
    65
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS71Parada Spec-2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests75≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6562

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 75.2 + 40% × 64.8 = 71

    Parada Spec-2: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 61.5 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for Parada Spec-2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 36

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS71Parada Spec-2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / – tests15–
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)–

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 15.5 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 36

    No owner ratings of noise for Ecsta PS71. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 52

    Treadwear

    Parada Spec-2 +10
    62
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS71Parada Spec-2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests45≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online6359

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 45.1 + 40% × 62.5 = 52

    Parada Spec-2: 60% × 63.5 (est.) + 40% × 58.7 = 62

    No road tests of treadwear for Parada Spec-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  6. 71

    Handling (owners)

    Ecsta PS71 +2
    69
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS71Parada Spec-2
    Reviews found online7169
Scores at a glance
Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs Yokohama Parada Spec-2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Ecsta PS71Yokohama Parada Spec-2
Relative Score 73 66
Dry 75 73
Wet 84 61
Comfort 71 65
Noise 36 –
Treadwear 52 62
Handling (owners) 71 69

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Ecsta PS71

Parada Spec-2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryEcsta PS71Parada Spec-2ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #4/52 2025 Summer Tyre Test Shootout #8/8 2013 Auto Bild Performance Summer Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ecsta PS71

Pros

  • Outstanding wet weather grip and aquaplaning resistance
  • High value for money compared to tier-one premium brands
  • Predictable handling and solid cornering stability in both dry and wet conditions

Cons

  • Noticeable road noise or droning at motorway speeds on certain vehicles
  • Occasional reports of balancing difficulties or out-of-round/egg-shaped tires
  • Softer sidewalls can lead to slightly vague steering response around center or tread block movement
All owner themes in the Ecsta PS71 review

Tire B Parada Spec-2

Pros

  • Outstanding dry grip and cornering stability
  • Excellent value for money and aggressive tread design
  • Precise steering feedback and predictable breakaway limits in the dry

Cons

  • Poor wet-weather traction and high risk of aquaplaning
  • Fast tread wear due to the soft rubber compound
  • Noticeable road noise at cruising speeds
All owner themes in the Parada Spec-2 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Kumho Ecsta PS71

Positive

Community sentiment towards the Kumho Ecsta PS71 is generally positive, with drivers viewing it as an affordable, high-value mid-range/UHP tire that performs reliably compared to premium brands. Users praise its wet grip rating, competitive pricing, and overall road manners once warmed up, though some note it provides adequate rather than top-tier grip and raise questions regarding cold performance and tread life.

Top themes
#Value for money#Wet grip performance#UHP budget alternative#Tread wear durability#Warm-up temperature behavior#Tire pressure specifications

Based on 24 community posts

Tire B

Yokohama Parada Spec-2

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Ecsta PS71 B · Yokohama Parada Spec-2
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available133—
Rim diameters16″ – 22″—
SidewallBlackwall—

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Ecsta PS71

Yokohama Parada Spec-2

Winner: Kumho Ecsta PS71 — better wet and comfort. Pick the Yokohama Parada Spec-2 if treadwear matters most to you.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 84 vs 61 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama Parada Spec-2 scores 62 vs 52 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 71 vs 65 on comfort.

Tire A · Kumho Ecsta PS71
Tire B · Yokohama Parada Spec-2

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ecsta PS71 or Parada Spec-2?

Which is better in the wet, Ecsta PS71 or Parada Spec-2?

Kumho Ecsta PS71, 84 vs 61 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ecsta PS71 or Parada Spec-2?

Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 73 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Ecsta PS71 or Parada Spec-2?

Kumho Ecsta PS71, 71 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Ecsta PS71 or Parada Spec-2?

Yokohama Parada Spec-2, 62 vs 52 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology