Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV vs Toyo Proxes R32 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 9 + 0 road tests and 1,383 + 5 owner reviews. How we score

Pilot Sport 4 SUV is ahead, 83–70

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
± 5

Tests 80 · 9 tests Owners 79 · 1,383 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 12 in 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested (wet braking)

“Loving my new Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV tires and Enkei Raijin wheels”

Toyo Proxes R32
Tire BToyo

Proxes R32

Summer

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 5 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 86

    Dry

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV +13
    73
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4 SUVProxes R32
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / – tests86≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online8676

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 86.1 + 40% × 85.9 = 86

    Proxes R32: 60% × 71.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.7 = 73

    No road tests of dry for Proxes R32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 91

    Wet

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV +22
    69
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4 SUVProxes R32
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / – tests93≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online8769

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 93.4 + 40% × 86.5 = 91

    Proxes R32: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 69

    No road tests of wet for Proxes R32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 64

    Comfort

    Proxes R32 +5
    69
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4 SUVProxes R32
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests54≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7169

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 40% × 54 + 60% × 70.6 = 64

    Proxes R32: 40% × 68.9 (est.) + 60% × 69.4 = 69

    No road tests of comfort for Proxes R32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).

  4. 58

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4 SUVProxes R32
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / – tests53–
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)–

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 52.5 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 58

    No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Sport 4 SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 72

    Treadwear

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV +6
    66
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4 SUVProxes R32
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests77≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6565

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 77 + 40% × 65.3 = 72

    Proxes R32: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 65.3 = 66

    No road tests of treadwear for Proxes R32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  6. 83

    Handling (owners)

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV +7
    76
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4 SUVProxes R32
    Reviews found online8376
  7. 64

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4 SUVProxes R32
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / – tests64–
Scores at a glance
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV vs Toyo Proxes R32: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin Pilot Sport 4 SUVToyo Proxes R32
Relative Score 83 70
Dry 86 73
Wet 91 69
Comfort 64 69
Noise 58 –
Treadwear 72 66
Handling (owners) 83 76
Efficiency 64 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

± 8

Proxes R32

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Pros

  • Outstanding grip and safety in both wet and dry conditions
  • Precise steering response and enhanced cornering stability for heavy SUVs
  • Noticeable improvement in ride comfort and overall handling

Cons

  • Higher-than-average purchase price
  • Increased road noise reported by some users as the tread wears down
  • Faster tread wear and shorter mileage lifespan under aggressive driving or heavy vehicle loads
All owner themes in the Pilot Sport 4 SUV review

Tire B Proxes R32

Pros

  • Excellent steering precision and responsiveness
  • Strong dry-weather grip and road feedback
  • Quiet operation and high comfort levels

Cons

  • Subpar traction and handling on wet surfaces
  • Higher rolling resistance compared to competitors
  • Rapid tread wear reported by some users
All owner themes in the Proxes R32 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Positive

Community members generally praise the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV for its strong grip, handling performance, and SUV-specific design. Users frequently consider it an upgrade over OEM options like the Latitude Sport 3, though some discuss its premium price, summer temperature limitations, and expected tread longevity.

Top themes
#grip and handling#SUV-specific performance#tread life longevity#Latitude Sport 3 comparison#summer tire limitations#premium pricing

Based on 25 community posts

Tire B

Toyo Proxes R32

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV B · Toyo Proxes R32
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available653
Rim diameters17″ – 23″17″
UTQG220 - 320 A - AA A220 A A
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Toyo Proxes R32

Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV — better wet, dry and handling. Pick the Toyo Proxes R32 if comfort matters most to you. Toyo Proxes R32 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV scores 91 vs 69 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV scores 86 vs 73 on dry.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV scores 83 vs 76 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV scores 72 vs 66 on treadwear.

Tire A · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Tire B · Toyo Proxes R32

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Pilot Sport 4 SUV or Proxes R32?

Which is better in the wet, Pilot Sport 4 SUV or Proxes R32?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV, 91 vs 69 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Pilot Sport 4 SUV or Proxes R32?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV, 86 vs 73 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Pilot Sport 4 SUV or Proxes R32?

Toyo Proxes R32, 69 vs 64 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Pilot Sport 4 SUV or Proxes R32?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV, 72 vs 66 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology