Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Vredestein Ultrac Pro — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 21 + 16 road tests and 12,714 + 67 owner reviews. How we score
Best test result: #1 of 45 in 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout (dry braking)
“Those are Pilot sport 4 (all season). If it had s after the 4 it would be the summer high performance version. I put the pilot sport 4 on wife's GTI autobahn 2016. Great handling tire, stiff side walls, not the smoothest ride but best overall.”
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2025 AZ Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
87
Dry
Pilot Sport 4 +6
81
Why this score
Source
Pilot Sport 4
Ultrac Pro
Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / 16 tests
89
83
Reviews found online
84
79
Pilot Sport 4:60% × 89.3 + 40% × 83.9 = 87
Ultrac Pro:60% × 82.7 + 40% × 78.9 = 81
89
Wet
Pilot Sport 4 +6
83
Why this score
Source
Pilot Sport 4
Ultrac Pro
Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / 16 tests
92
84
Reviews found online
84
83
Pilot Sport 4:60% × 92.5 + 40% × 84.4 = 89
Ultrac Pro:60% × 83.8 + 40% × 82.9 = 83
76
Comfort
Level
76
Why this score
Source
Pilot Sport 4
Ultrac Pro
Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 6 tests
82
77
Reviews found online
72
75
Pilot Sport 4:40% × 81.6 + 60% × 71.7 = 76
Ultrac Pro:40% × 76.6 + 60% × 74.8 = 76
70
Noise
Ultrac Pro +14
84
Why this score
Source
Pilot Sport 4
Ultrac Pro
Professional tests (TWG score) · 13 / 12 tests
73
96
Reviews found online
≈ 66 (est.)
≈ 66 (est.)
Pilot Sport 4:60% × 73.2 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 70
Ultrac Pro:60% × 96.2 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 84
No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Sport 4 or Ultrac Pro. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
71
Treadwear
Pilot Sport 4 +12
59
Why this score
Source
Pilot Sport 4
Ultrac Pro
Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 4 tests
78
58
Reviews found online
60
61
Pilot Sport 4:60% × 78.1 + 40% × 59.5 = 71
Ultrac Pro:60% × 57.8 + 40% × 61 = 59
81
Handling (owners)
Pilot Sport 4 +2
79
Why this score
Source
Pilot Sport 4
Ultrac Pro
Reviews found online
81
79
76
Efficiency
Pilot Sport 4 +7
69
Why this score
Source
Pilot Sport 4
Ultrac Pro
Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / 13 tests
76
69
Scores at a glance
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Vredestein Ultrac Pro: scores by category (0–100)
Category
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
Relative Score
81
76
Dry
87
81
Wet
89
83
Comfort
76
76
Noise
70
84
Treadwear
71
59
Handling (owners)
81
79
Efficiency
76
69
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
81
/ 100
± 4
Pilot Sport 4
76
/ 100
± 5
Ultrac Pro
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
Discipline
Category
Pilot Sport 4
Ultrac Pro
Δ
Head-to-head
Dry Braking
Dry
80%#3/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19
96%#5/50 · 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking?
–
Different tests
Dry Handling
Dry
80%#3/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19
100%#3/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Dry Handling (tester's mark)
Dry
90%#2/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19
87%#5/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Curved Aquaplaning
Wet
80%#5/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19
98%#4/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning
Wet
80%#2/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19
95%#15/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Wet Braking
Wet
70%#8/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19
88%#16/50 · 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking?
–
Different tests
Wet Circle
Wet
97%#4/10 · 2022 Sport Auto UHP, UUHP and Semi Slick Tyre Test
94%#4/8 · 2026 Autobild Sports Cars Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Wet Handling
Wet
70%#4/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19
98%#9/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Wet Handling (tester's mark)
Wet
78%#7/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19
92%#4/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Comfort (tester's mark)
Comfort
70%#5/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19
91%#10/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Exterior Noise
Noise
90%#3/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19
97%#7/7 · 2025 Autobild Sportcars Summer Tire Test R20
–
Different tests
Noise
Noise
99%#6/10 · 2022 Sport Auto UHP, UUHP and Semi Slick Tyre Test
99%#3/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Wear
Treadwear
96%#5/16 · 2020 ADAC 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test
66%#17/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Rolling Resistance
Efficiency
80%#2/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19
87%#4/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Total Cost of Ownership
Cost
#16/202020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test
#10/202026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Value
Cost
59%#20/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test
72%#14/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Overall Ranking
Overall
#7/92022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19
#13/502026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking?
–
Different tests
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Pilot Sport 4
Pros
Exceptional wet and dry traction with outstanding resistance to aquaplaning
Noticeable improvement in ride comfort and a reduction in cabin noise compared to standard run-flat tires
Progressive and predictable breakaway limits during spirited driving
Cons
Faster-than-average treadwear, particularly under aggressive driving or on rear-wheel-drive performance cars
Softer sidewalls can lead to a slight lack of initial steering precision and a vague feel at the limit for hardcore enthusiasts
Performance drops off significantly in cold, freezing, or snowy winter conditions
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Positive
The community widely regards the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 line as a premium upgrade offering exceptional dry and wet grip, precise handling, and superior ride comfort compared to OEM or run-flat tires. While celebrated for performance, users frequently discuss its high price tag, faster treadwear, and noticeable drop in EV efficiency. Some drivers also note increased road noise and reduced traction when temperatures drop near freezing.
#Wet and dry grip#Run-flat replacement upgrade#Treadwear and longevity#Cold weather performance#Road noise and comfort#EV range and efficiency#Comparison to Continental tires
Based on 246 community posts
Tire B
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Specs side by side
Attribute
A · Michelin Pilot Sport 4
B · Vredestein Ultrac Pro
Category
Summer
Summer
Vehicle type
Passenger Car / Crossover
—
Sizes available
62
98
Rim diameters
16″ – 20″
18″ – 24″
UTQG
300 - 320 A - AA A
—
Sizes in common
35
35
Which one should you actually buy?
81
/ 100
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
76
/ 100
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 — better treadwear, efficiency and dry. Pick the Vredestein Ultrac Pro if noise matters most to you.
Pick tire BYou want a quieter cabin
Vredestein Ultrac Pro scores 84 vs 70 on noise.
Pick tire AYou want the longest tread life
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 71 vs 59 on treadwear.
Pick tire AYou want lower fuel or energy use
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 76 vs 69 on efficiency.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology