Nexen N FERA SUR4 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Pilot Sport 5 vs Nexen N FERA SUR4 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 23 + 0 road tests and 6,449 + 6 owner reviews. How we score

Pilot Sport 5 is ahead, 86–62

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Pilot Sport 5
Tire AMichelin

Pilot Sport 5

Summer

Tests 84 · 23 tests Owners 82 · 6,449 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test (subj. dry handling)

“Put some 235/45 R17 ps5’s on my 9-5 They fill up the arches quite nice!”

Nexen N FERA SUR4
Tire BNexen

N FERA SUR4

Summer

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 57 · 6 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 89

    Dry

    Pilot Sport 5 +18
    71
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 5N FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 23 / – tests92≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online8473

    Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 92.2 + 40% × 83.8 = 89

    N FERA SUR4: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 73.2 = 71

    No road tests of dry for N FERA SUR4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 90

    Wet

    Pilot Sport 5 +35
    55
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 5N FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 23 / – tests92≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online8750

    Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 92.4 + 40% × 86.7 = 90

    N FERA SUR4: 60% × 58.8 (est.) + 40% × 50.1 = 55

    No road tests of wet for N FERA SUR4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 75

    Comfort

    Pilot Sport 5 +15
    60
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 5N FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / – tests71≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online8151

    Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 71 + 40% × 80.6 = 75

    N FERA SUR4: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 50.6 = 60

    No road tests of comfort for N FERA SUR4. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 47

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 5N FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 15 / – tests33–
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)–

    Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 33.2 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 47

    No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Sport 5. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 82

    Treadwear

    Pilot Sport 5 +27
    55
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 5N FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests87≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online7547

    Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 87.2 + 40% × 74.7 = 82

    N FERA SUR4: 60% × 59.8 (est.) + 40% × 46.7 = 55

    No road tests of treadwear for N FERA SUR4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  6. 83

    Handling (owners)

    Pilot Sport 5 +12
    71
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 5N FERA SUR4
    Reviews found online8371
Scores at a glance
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 vs Nexen N FERA SUR4: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin Pilot Sport 5Nexen N FERA SUR4
Relative Score 86 62
Dry 89 71
Wet 90 55
Comfort 75 60
Noise 47 –
Treadwear 82 55
Handling (owners) 83 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Pilot Sport 5

N FERA SUR4

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Pilot Sport 5

Pros

  • Outstanding wet and dry traction with high resistance to aquaplaning
  • Superior tread life and longevity compared to competitors and previous generations
  • Noticeable improvements in ride comfort and a quieter cabin over rough road surfaces

Cons

  • Softer sidewalls can lead to initial steering vagueness or understeer during hard cornering
  • Higher price point compared to some tier-one competitors
  • Performance and grip degrade significantly under intense track heat or heavy circuit use
All owner themes in the Pilot Sport 5 review

Tire B N FERA SUR4

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and track-day performance
  • Precise steering feedback and predictable handling
  • Cost-effective alternative to more expensive track tires

Cons

  • High level of road noise
  • Poor wet-weather performance and dangerous hydroplaning tendencies in heavy rain
  • Fast tread wear
All owner themes in the N FERA SUR4 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Positive

Community opinion on the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 is overwhelmingly positive for daily street driving, praising its exceptional wet grip, tread longevity, and quiet comfort compared to run-flats and older performance tires. However, several enthusiasts note downsides for aggressive or track use, specifically citing softer sidewalls, muted steering feedback, and poor heat resistance leading to delamination under track conditions. Most drivers consider it an outstanding premium all-rounder for sporty street cars rather than a dedicated track or extreme-performance tire.

Top themes
#wet grip performance#tread wear longevity#daily driving comfort#track heat delamination#soft sidewall steering feedback#road noise levels#comparison with ps4s

Based on 174 community posts

Tire B

Nexen N FERA SUR4

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Pilot Sport 5 B · Nexen N FERA SUR4
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available66—
Rim diameters16″ – 22″—

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Nexen N FERA SUR4

Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 5 — better wet, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Nexen N FERA SUR4 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 90 vs 55 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 82 vs 55 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 89 vs 71 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 75 vs 60 on comfort.

Tire A · Michelin Pilot Sport 5
Tire B · Nexen N FERA SUR4

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Pilot Sport 5 or N FERA SUR4?

Which is better in the wet, Pilot Sport 5 or N FERA SUR4?

Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 90 vs 55 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Pilot Sport 5 or N FERA SUR4?

Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 89 vs 71 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Pilot Sport 5 or N FERA SUR4?

Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 75 vs 60 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Pilot Sport 5 or N FERA SUR4?

Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 82 vs 55 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology