Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ vs Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 655 + 12 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Pilot Sport A/S 3+ and Pilot Sport PS2 ZP are level at 73.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+
Tire AMichelin

Pilot Sport A/S 3+

All Season

Tests – · 1 test Owners 71 · 655 reviews

Best test result: #6 of 19 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))

“Just had these Pilot Sport A/S 3+ installed to replace OEM Dunlops”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    Pilot Sport PS2 ZP +1
    75
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport A/S 3+Pilot Sport PS2 ZP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online7879

    Pilot Sport A/S 3+: 60% × 71.8 (est.) + 40% × 77.8 = 74

    Pilot Sport PS2 ZP: 60% × 72.2 (est.) + 40% × 78.9 = 75

    No road tests of dry for Pilot Sport A/S 3+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Pilot Sport PS2 ZP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 77

    Wet

    Pilot Sport A/S 3+ +1
    76
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport A/S 3+Pilot Sport PS2 ZP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 75 (est.)≈ 75 (est.)
    Reviews found online8078

    Pilot Sport A/S 3+: 60% × 75.2 (est.) + 40% × 79.5 = 77

    Pilot Sport PS2 ZP: 60% × 74.5 (est.) + 40% × 78.2 = 76

    No road tests of wet for Pilot Sport A/S 3+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Pilot Sport PS2 ZP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 63

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport A/S 3+Pilot Sport PS2 ZP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online58–

    Pilot Sport A/S 3+: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 58.3 = 63

    No road tests of snow for Pilot Sport A/S 3+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 67

    Comfort

    Pilot Sport PS2 ZP +3
    70
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport A/S 3+Pilot Sport PS2 ZP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6570

    Pilot Sport A/S 3+: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.5 = 67

    Pilot Sport PS2 ZP: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.1 = 70

    No road tests of comfort for Pilot Sport A/S 3+ or Pilot Sport PS2 ZP. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 67

    Noise

    Pilot Sport PS2 ZP +2
    69
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport A/S 3+Pilot Sport PS2 ZP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6871

    Pilot Sport A/S 3+: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 67.5 = 67

    Pilot Sport PS2 ZP: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.5 = 69

    No road tests of noise for Pilot Sport A/S 3+ or Pilot Sport PS2 ZP. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 70

    Treadwear

    Pilot Sport A/S 3+ +5
    65
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport A/S 3+Pilot Sport PS2 ZP
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests72≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6664

    Pilot Sport A/S 3+: 60% × 72 + 40% × 65.9 = 70

    Pilot Sport PS2 ZP: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 64.2 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Sport PS2 ZP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 71

    Handling (owners)

    Pilot Sport PS2 ZP +6
    77
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport A/S 3+Pilot Sport PS2 ZP
    Reviews found online7177
Scores at a glance
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ vs Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP
Relative Score 73 73
Dry 74 75
Wet 77 76
Snow 63 –
Comfort 67 70
Noise 67 69
Treadwear 70 65
Handling (owners) 71 77

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Pilot Sport A/S 3+

Pilot Sport PS2 ZP

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Pilot Sport A/S 3+

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and cornering stability in both dry and wet conditions
  • Crisp, highly responsive steering and handling feel
  • Substantial upgrade in performance and wet weather confidence compared to OEM tires

Cons

  • Significantly faster tread wear than expected, often failing to reach the mileage warranty
  • High levels of road noise, buzzing, and droning that increase noticeably as the tread wears down
  • Stiff sidewalls leading to a harsher, less comfortable ride over bumps and road imperfections
All owner themes in the Pilot Sport A/S 3+ review

Tire B Pilot Sport PS2 ZP

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet grip with a glued-to-the-road feel
  • Improved ride comfort and lower cabin noise compared to standard run-flats
  • Predictable handling with gentle breakaway characteristics near limits

Cons

  • Stiff or rock-hard ride quality when kept at recommended manufacturer pressures
  • Softer sidewalls can introduce a spongy or wobbly feel during rapid direction changes on certain vehicles
  • Frustrating warranty terms for staggered setups
All owner themes in the Pilot Sport PS2 ZP review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+

Positive

Community members widely praise the Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ for its dry handling, wet grip, and substantial improvement in ride comfort over stock tires. However, several users express reservations about its poor traction in genuine snow conditions and note that road noise can become prominent as the tread wears. It is frequently compared against competitors like the Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 as well as its successor, the Pilot Sport All Season 4.

r/mazdaspeed3 ·1 upvote ·2018-11-20

“been driving on them for about 2 weeks! I was running pilot super sports during the summer and was very happy with them so I went with the pilot sport A/S 3+ for the winter. So far I have been pleased with the traction in wet and below freezing conditions. Haven't driven in snow yet so can't comment on that yet. They handle nearly as well as my old super sports in the corners and have significantly less road noise. Obviously they are all season tires so they won't have the most amazing performance driving experience compared to summer tires, but I think they are a good practical compromise for our cars.”

corvetteforum.com

“With the compounds used on the newer summer tires, I won't be able to use them here in northern Illinois in late fall & early spring. It would require me to get a 2nd set of tires & wheels for those times of the year. I'm trying to avoid that. At this point, my #1 option is the Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+. My only concern is that they won't handle as well as I'd like, being all season tires. Although, the reviews say that they handle as well as many summer tires. So, I'm going to find out. Again, it's primarily down to the run-flat / non-run-flat decision for me. I'm just not convinced yet that the noise level and ride quality will be the same as conventional tires. I guess I can always exchange them if I don't like them.”

bobistheoilguy.com ·2 upvotes ·2024-03-01

“Slam me if you must, but I bought the Falken Azenis FK460 A/S in size 255-40x19 for my 2016 Mustang GT, based largely on Tire Rack testing and their customer comments. First thing I noticed was they are quieter than my old Michelin Pilot Sport A/S3+ tires, which were noisy when new and got worse. Also, the rear tires don't want to slip out like the Michelins when I get on the gas through a tight turn. However, the Michelins had been on the car for >6 years and 27K miles. But other than than the two categories above, it's hard for me to discern a lot of difference. Maybe it's only in my head, but perhaps the Michelins were a bit more responsive to quick motions at the steering wheel. I have no idea how well the Falkens will perform after 20K miles, but for me that's probably 4 years from now. Fair or not, I shied away from the Contis because I had read about balancing issues on a couple websites.”

Top themes
#Dry cornering grip#Wet traction performance#Snow traction limitations#Road noise over time#Ride comfort comparison#Balancing and tire pressure#Comparison to Continental DWS

Based on 47 community posts

Tire B

Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ B · Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP
CategoryAll SeasonSummer Max Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+

Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP

Too close to call: Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ and Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP are within 2 points overall. Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ is stronger on treadwear. Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP is stronger on handling and comfort. Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP scores 77 vs 71 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ scores 70 vs 65 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP scores 70 vs 67 on comfort.

Tire A · Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Pilot Sport A/S 3+ or Pilot Sport PS2 ZP?

Which is better in the wet, Pilot Sport A/S 3+ or Pilot Sport PS2 ZP?

Neither, by our numbers: 77 vs 76 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Pilot Sport A/S 3+ or Pilot Sport PS2 ZP?

Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 75 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, Pilot Sport A/S 3+ or Pilot Sport PS2 ZP?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 69 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Pilot Sport A/S 3+ or Pilot Sport PS2 ZP?

Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP, 70 vs 67 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Pilot Sport A/S 3+ or Pilot Sport PS2 ZP?

Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+, 70 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology