Tests – · 1 test Owners 71 · 655 reviews
Best test result: #6 of 19 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))
“Just had these Pilot Sport A/S 3+ installed to replace OEM Dunlops”
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 655 + 12 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Pilot Sport A/S 3+ and Pilot Sport PS2 ZP are level at 73.
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 71 · 655 reviews
Best test result: #6 of 19 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))
“Just had these Pilot Sport A/S 3+ installed to replace OEM Dunlops”
Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 12 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Pilot Sport A/S 3+ | Pilot Sport PS2 ZP |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 72 (est.) | ≈ 72 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 78 | 79 |
Pilot Sport A/S 3+: 60% × 71.8 (est.) + 40% × 77.8 = 74
Pilot Sport PS2 ZP: 60% × 72.2 (est.) + 40% × 78.9 = 75
No road tests of dry for Pilot Sport A/S 3+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Pilot Sport PS2 ZP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
| Source | Pilot Sport A/S 3+ | Pilot Sport PS2 ZP |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 75 (est.) | ≈ 75 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 80 | 78 |
Pilot Sport A/S 3+: 60% × 75.2 (est.) + 40% × 79.5 = 77
Pilot Sport PS2 ZP: 60% × 74.5 (est.) + 40% × 78.2 = 76
No road tests of wet for Pilot Sport A/S 3+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Pilot Sport PS2 ZP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
| Source | Pilot Sport A/S 3+ | Pilot Sport PS2 ZP |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 66 (est.) | – |
| Reviews found online | 58 | – |
Pilot Sport A/S 3+: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 58.3 = 63
No road tests of snow for Pilot Sport A/S 3+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
| Source | Pilot Sport A/S 3+ | Pilot Sport PS2 ZP |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 68 (est.) | ≈ 69 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 65 | 70 |
Pilot Sport A/S 3+: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.5 = 67
Pilot Sport PS2 ZP: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.1 = 70
No road tests of comfort for Pilot Sport A/S 3+ or Pilot Sport PS2 ZP. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Pilot Sport A/S 3+ | Pilot Sport PS2 ZP |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 67 (est.) | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 68 | 71 |
Pilot Sport A/S 3+: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 67.5 = 67
Pilot Sport PS2 ZP: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.5 = 69
No road tests of noise for Pilot Sport A/S 3+ or Pilot Sport PS2 ZP. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Pilot Sport A/S 3+ | Pilot Sport PS2 ZP |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 72 | ≈ 65 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 66 | 64 |
Pilot Sport A/S 3+: 60% × 72 + 40% × 65.9 = 70
Pilot Sport PS2 ZP: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 64.2 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Sport PS2 ZP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
| Source | Pilot Sport A/S 3+ | Pilot Sport PS2 ZP |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 71 | 77 |
| Category | Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ | Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 73 |
| Dry | 74 | 75 |
| Wet | 77 | 76 |
| Snow | 63 | – |
| Comfort | 67 | 70 |
| Noise | 67 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 70 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 71 | 77 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Pilot Sport A/S 3+
Pilot Sport PS2 ZP
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community members widely praise the Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ for its dry handling, wet grip, and substantial improvement in ride comfort over stock tires. However, several users express reservations about its poor traction in genuine snow conditions and note that road noise can become prominent as the tread wears. It is frequently compared against competitors like the Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 as well as its successor, the Pilot Sport All Season 4.
“been driving on them for about 2 weeks! I was running pilot super sports during the summer and was very happy with them so I went with the pilot sport A/S 3+ for the winter. So far I have been pleased with the traction in wet and below freezing conditions. Haven't driven in snow yet so can't comment on that yet. They handle nearly as well as my old super sports in the corners and have significantly less road noise. Obviously they are all season tires so they won't have the most amazing performance driving experience compared to summer tires, but I think they are a good practical compromise for our cars.”
“With the compounds used on the newer summer tires, I won't be able to use them here in northern Illinois in late fall & early spring. It would require me to get a 2nd set of tires & wheels for those times of the year. I'm trying to avoid that. At this point, my #1 option is the Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+. My only concern is that they won't handle as well as I'd like, being all season tires. Although, the reviews say that they handle as well as many summer tires. So, I'm going to find out. Again, it's primarily down to the run-flat / non-run-flat decision for me. I'm just not convinced yet that the noise level and ride quality will be the same as conventional tires. I guess I can always exchange them if I don't like them.”
“Slam me if you must, but I bought the Falken Azenis FK460 A/S in size 255-40x19 for my 2016 Mustang GT, based largely on Tire Rack testing and their customer comments. First thing I noticed was they are quieter than my old Michelin Pilot Sport A/S3+ tires, which were noisy when new and got worse. Also, the rear tires don't want to slip out like the Michelins when I get on the gas through a tight turn. However, the Michelins had been on the car for >6 years and 27K miles. But other than than the two categories above, it's hard for me to discern a lot of difference. Maybe it's only in my head, but perhaps the Michelins were a bit more responsive to quick motions at the steering wheel. I have no idea how well the Falkens will perform after 20K miles, but for me that's probably 4 years from now. Fair or not, I shied away from the Contis because I had read about balancing issues on a couple websites.”
Based on 47 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ | B · Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer Max Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+
Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP
Too close to call: Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ and Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP are within 2 points overall. Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ is stronger on treadwear. Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP is stronger on handling and comfort. Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP scores 77 vs 71 on handling.
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ scores 70 vs 65 on treadwear.
Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP scores 70 vs 67 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Neither, by our numbers: 77 vs 76 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 75 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 69 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP, 70 vs 67 on our comfort score.
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+, 70 vs 65 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology