Tests – · 1 test Owners 71 · 655 reviews
Best test result: #6 of 19 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))
“Just had these Pilot Sport A/S 3+ installed to replace OEM Dunlops”
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 655 + 58 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Pilot Sport A/S 3+ 72, Quatrac 3 71.
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 71 · 655 reviews
Best test result: #6 of 19 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))
“Just had these Pilot Sport A/S 3+ installed to replace OEM Dunlops”
Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 58 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Pilot Sport A/S 3+ | Quatrac 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 72 (est.) | ≈ 68 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 78 | 69 |
Pilot Sport A/S 3+: 60% × 71.8 (est.) + 40% × 77.8 = 74
Quatrac 3: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.6 = 68
No road tests of dry for Pilot Sport A/S 3+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Quatrac 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
| Source | Pilot Sport A/S 3+ | Quatrac 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 75 (est.) | ≈ 74 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 80 | 78 |
Pilot Sport A/S 3+: 60% × 75.2 (est.) + 40% × 79.5 = 77
Quatrac 3: 60% × 74.1 (est.) + 40% × 77.5 = 75
No road tests of wet for Pilot Sport A/S 3+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Quatrac 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
| Source | Pilot Sport A/S 3+ | Quatrac 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 66 (est.) | ≈ 73 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 58 | 80 |
Pilot Sport A/S 3+: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 58.3 = 63
Quatrac 3: 60% × 73.3 (est.) + 40% × 80.1 = 76
No road tests of snow for Pilot Sport A/S 3+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Quatrac 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
| Source | Pilot Sport A/S 3+ | Quatrac 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 68 (est.) | ≈ 69 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 65 | 69 |
Pilot Sport A/S 3+: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.5 = 67
Quatrac 3: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 69 = 69
No road tests of comfort for Pilot Sport A/S 3+ or Quatrac 3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Pilot Sport A/S 3+ | Quatrac 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 67 (est.) | – |
| Reviews found online | 68 | – |
Pilot Sport A/S 3+: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 67.5 = 67
No road tests of noise for Pilot Sport A/S 3+. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Pilot Sport A/S 3+ | Quatrac 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 72 | ≈ 66 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 66 | 66 |
Pilot Sport A/S 3+: 60% × 72 + 40% × 65.9 = 70
Quatrac 3: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 65.8 = 66
No road tests of treadwear for Quatrac 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
| Source | Pilot Sport A/S 3+ | Quatrac 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 71 | 71 |
| Category | Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ | Vredestein Quatrac 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 71 |
| Dry | 74 | 68 |
| Wet | 77 | 75 |
| Snow | 63 | 76 |
| Comfort | 67 | 69 |
| Noise | 67 | – |
| Treadwear | 70 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 71 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Pilot Sport A/S 3+
Quatrac 3
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Pilot Sport A/S 3+ | Quatrac 3 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #2/19 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires | #35/54 2013 54 Tyre Braking Test | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community members widely praise the Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ for its dry handling, wet grip, and substantial improvement in ride comfort over stock tires. However, several users express reservations about its poor traction in genuine snow conditions and note that road noise can become prominent as the tread wears. It is frequently compared against competitors like the Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 as well as its successor, the Pilot Sport All Season 4.
“been driving on them for about 2 weeks! I was running pilot super sports during the summer and was very happy with them so I went with the pilot sport A/S 3+ for the winter. So far I have been pleased with the traction in wet and below freezing conditions. Haven't driven in snow yet so can't comment on that yet. They handle nearly as well as my old super sports in the corners and have significantly less road noise. Obviously they are all season tires so they won't have the most amazing performance driving experience compared to summer tires, but I think they are a good practical compromise for our cars.”
“With the compounds used on the newer summer tires, I won't be able to use them here in northern Illinois in late fall & early spring. It would require me to get a 2nd set of tires & wheels for those times of the year. I'm trying to avoid that. At this point, my #1 option is the Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+. My only concern is that they won't handle as well as I'd like, being all season tires. Although, the reviews say that they handle as well as many summer tires. So, I'm going to find out. Again, it's primarily down to the run-flat / non-run-flat decision for me. I'm just not convinced yet that the noise level and ride quality will be the same as conventional tires. I guess I can always exchange them if I don't like them.”
“Slam me if you must, but I bought the Falken Azenis FK460 A/S in size 255-40x19 for my 2016 Mustang GT, based largely on Tire Rack testing and their customer comments. First thing I noticed was they are quieter than my old Michelin Pilot Sport A/S3+ tires, which were noisy when new and got worse. Also, the rear tires don't want to slip out like the Michelins when I get on the gas through a tight turn. However, the Michelins had been on the car for >6 years and 27K miles. But other than than the two categories above, it's hard for me to discern a lot of difference. Maybe it's only in my head, but perhaps the Michelins were a bit more responsive to quick motions at the steering wheel. I have no idea how well the Falkens will perform after 20K miles, but for me that's probably 4 years from now. Fair or not, I shied away from the Contis because I had read about balancing issues on a couple websites.”
Based on 47 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ | B · Vredestein Quatrac 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+
Vredestein Quatrac 3
Too close to call: Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ and Vredestein Quatrac 3 are within 2 points overall. Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ is stronger on dry and treadwear. Vredestein Quatrac 3 is stronger on snow.
Vredestein Quatrac 3 scores 76 vs 63 on snow.
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ scores 74 vs 68 on dry.
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ scores 70 vs 66 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Neither, by our numbers: 77 vs 75 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+, 74 vs 68 on our dry score.
Vredestein Quatrac 3, 76 vs 63 on our snow score.
Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 69 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+, 70 vs 66 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology