Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ vs Vredestein Quatrac 3 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 655 + 58 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Pilot Sport A/S 3+ 72, Quatrac 3 71.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+
Tire AMichelin

Pilot Sport A/S 3+

All Season

Tests – · 1 test Owners 71 · 655 reviews

Best test result: #6 of 19 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))

“Just had these Pilot Sport A/S 3+ installed to replace OEM Dunlops”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    Pilot Sport A/S 3+ +6
    68
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport A/S 3+Quatrac 3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7869

    Pilot Sport A/S 3+: 60% × 71.8 (est.) + 40% × 77.8 = 74

    Quatrac 3: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.6 = 68

    No road tests of dry for Pilot Sport A/S 3+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Quatrac 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 77

    Wet

    Pilot Sport A/S 3+ +2
    75
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport A/S 3+Quatrac 3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 75 (est.)≈ 74 (est.)
    Reviews found online8078

    Pilot Sport A/S 3+: 60% × 75.2 (est.) + 40% × 79.5 = 77

    Quatrac 3: 60% × 74.1 (est.) + 40% × 77.5 = 75

    No road tests of wet for Pilot Sport A/S 3+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Quatrac 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 63

    Snow

    Quatrac 3 +13
    76
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport A/S 3+Quatrac 3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online5880

    Pilot Sport A/S 3+: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 58.3 = 63

    Quatrac 3: 60% × 73.3 (est.) + 40% × 80.1 = 76

    No road tests of snow for Pilot Sport A/S 3+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Quatrac 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 67

    Comfort

    Quatrac 3 +2
    69
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport A/S 3+Quatrac 3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6569

    Pilot Sport A/S 3+: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.5 = 67

    Quatrac 3: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 69 = 69

    No road tests of comfort for Pilot Sport A/S 3+ or Quatrac 3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 67

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport A/S 3+Quatrac 3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online68–

    Pilot Sport A/S 3+: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 67.5 = 67

    No road tests of noise for Pilot Sport A/S 3+. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 70

    Treadwear

    Pilot Sport A/S 3+ +4
    66
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport A/S 3+Quatrac 3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests72≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6666

    Pilot Sport A/S 3+: 60% × 72 + 40% × 65.9 = 70

    Quatrac 3: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 65.8 = 66

    No road tests of treadwear for Quatrac 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 71

    Handling (owners)

    Level
    71
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport A/S 3+Quatrac 3
    Reviews found online7171
Scores at a glance
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ vs Vredestein Quatrac 3: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+Vredestein Quatrac 3
Relative Score 72 71
Dry 74 68
Wet 77 75
Snow 63 76
Comfort 67 69
Noise 67 –
Treadwear 70 66
Handling (owners) 71 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Pilot Sport A/S 3+

Quatrac 3

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryPilot Sport A/S 3+Quatrac 3ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #2/19 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires #35/54 2013 54 Tyre Braking Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Pilot Sport A/S 3+

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and cornering stability in both dry and wet conditions
  • Crisp, highly responsive steering and handling feel
  • Substantial upgrade in performance and wet weather confidence compared to OEM tires

Cons

  • Significantly faster tread wear than expected, often failing to reach the mileage warranty
  • High levels of road noise, buzzing, and droning that increase noticeably as the tread wears down
  • Stiff sidewalls leading to a harsher, less comfortable ride over bumps and road imperfections
All owner themes in the Pilot Sport A/S 3+ review

Tire B Quatrac 3

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and confidence in snow, ice, and slush
  • Strong wet-weather performance and hydroplaning resistance
  • Predictable and progressive handling limits

Cons

  • Develops significant road noise or rhythmic droning as tread wears down
  • Accelerated tread wear reported by some users, particularly on heavier vehicles
  • Slightly reduced dry-pavement grip and sharper cornering response compared to dedicated summer tires
All owner themes in the Quatrac 3 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+

Positive

Community members widely praise the Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ for its dry handling, wet grip, and substantial improvement in ride comfort over stock tires. However, several users express reservations about its poor traction in genuine snow conditions and note that road noise can become prominent as the tread wears. It is frequently compared against competitors like the Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 as well as its successor, the Pilot Sport All Season 4.

r/mazdaspeed3 ·1 upvote ·2018-11-20

“been driving on them for about 2 weeks! I was running pilot super sports during the summer and was very happy with them so I went with the pilot sport A/S 3+ for the winter. So far I have been pleased with the traction in wet and below freezing conditions. Haven't driven in snow yet so can't comment on that yet. They handle nearly as well as my old super sports in the corners and have significantly less road noise. Obviously they are all season tires so they won't have the most amazing performance driving experience compared to summer tires, but I think they are a good practical compromise for our cars.”

corvetteforum.com

“With the compounds used on the newer summer tires, I won't be able to use them here in northern Illinois in late fall & early spring. It would require me to get a 2nd set of tires & wheels for those times of the year. I'm trying to avoid that. At this point, my #1 option is the Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+. My only concern is that they won't handle as well as I'd like, being all season tires. Although, the reviews say that they handle as well as many summer tires. So, I'm going to find out. Again, it's primarily down to the run-flat / non-run-flat decision for me. I'm just not convinced yet that the noise level and ride quality will be the same as conventional tires. I guess I can always exchange them if I don't like them.”

bobistheoilguy.com ·2 upvotes ·2024-03-01

“Slam me if you must, but I bought the Falken Azenis FK460 A/S in size 255-40x19 for my 2016 Mustang GT, based largely on Tire Rack testing and their customer comments. First thing I noticed was they are quieter than my old Michelin Pilot Sport A/S3+ tires, which were noisy when new and got worse. Also, the rear tires don't want to slip out like the Michelins when I get on the gas through a tight turn. However, the Michelins had been on the car for >6 years and 27K miles. But other than than the two categories above, it's hard for me to discern a lot of difference. Maybe it's only in my head, but perhaps the Michelins were a bit more responsive to quick motions at the steering wheel. I have no idea how well the Falkens will perform after 20K miles, but for me that's probably 4 years from now. Fair or not, I shied away from the Contis because I had read about balancing issues on a couple websites.”

Top themes
#Dry cornering grip#Wet traction performance#Snow traction limitations#Road noise over time#Ride comfort comparison#Balancing and tire pressure#Comparison to Continental DWS

Based on 47 community posts

Tire B

Vredestein Quatrac 3

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ B · Vredestein Quatrac 3
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+

Vredestein Quatrac 3

Too close to call: Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ and Vredestein Quatrac 3 are within 2 points overall. Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ is stronger on dry and treadwear. Vredestein Quatrac 3 is stronger on snow.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Vredestein Quatrac 3 scores 76 vs 63 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ scores 74 vs 68 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ scores 70 vs 66 on treadwear.

Tire A · Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+
Tire B · Vredestein Quatrac 3

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Pilot Sport A/S 3+ or Quatrac 3?

Which is better in the wet, Pilot Sport A/S 3+ or Quatrac 3?

Neither, by our numbers: 77 vs 75 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Pilot Sport A/S 3+ or Quatrac 3?

Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+, 74 vs 68 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Pilot Sport A/S 3+ or Quatrac 3?

Vredestein Quatrac 3, 76 vs 63 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Pilot Sport A/S 3+ or Quatrac 3?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 69 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Pilot Sport A/S 3+ or Quatrac 3?

Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+, 70 vs 66 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology