Tests – · 1 test Owners 72 · 655 reviews
Best test result: #6 of 19 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))
“Just had these Pilot Sport A/S 3+ installed to replace OEM Dunlops”
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 2 road tests and 655 + 15 owner reviews. How we score
Pilot Sport A/S 3+ is ahead, 72–61
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 72 · 655 reviews
Best test result: #6 of 19 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))
“Just had these Pilot Sport A/S 3+ installed to replace OEM Dunlops”
Tests 61 · 2 tests Owners 60 · 15 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 19 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Pilot Sport A/S 3+ | Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests | ≈ 73 (est.) | 42 |
| Reviews found online | 79 | 61 |
Pilot Sport A/S 3+: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 78.6 = 75
Advan Sport AS: 60% × 42.3 + 40% × 60.5 = 50
No road tests of dry for Pilot Sport A/S 3+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
| Source | Pilot Sport A/S 3+ | Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests | ≈ 77 (est.) | 57 |
| Reviews found online | 82 | 65 |
Pilot Sport A/S 3+: 60% × 77 (est.) + 40% × 82.1 = 79
Advan Sport AS: 60% × 57 + 40% × 64.5 = 60
No road tests of wet for Pilot Sport A/S 3+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Pilot Sport A/S 3+ | Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 66 (est.) | ≈ 62 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 58 | 48 |
Pilot Sport A/S 3+: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 57.9 = 63
Advan Sport AS: 60% × 62.2 (est.) + 40% × 47.7 = 56
No road tests of snow for Pilot Sport A/S 3+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for Advan Sport AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
| Source | Pilot Sport A/S 3+ | Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests | ≈ 68 (est.) | 62 |
| Reviews found online | 63 | 65 |
Pilot Sport A/S 3+: 40% × 68 (est.) + 60% × 62.8 = 65
Advan Sport AS: 40% × 62.4 + 60% × 64.6 = 64
No road tests of comfort for Pilot Sport A/S 3+. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Pilot Sport A/S 3+ | Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests | – | 73 |
| Reviews found online | – | 64 |
Advan Sport AS: 60% × 72.7 + 40% × 63.7 = 69
| Source | Pilot Sport A/S 3+ | Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests | 73 | 81 |
| Reviews found online | 66 | 60 |
| Tested Tread Life (Miles) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 73% | 100% |
Pilot Sport A/S 3+: 60% × 72.5 + 40% × 66.1 = 70
Advan Sport AS: 60% × 81 + 40% × 59.9 = 73
| Source | Pilot Sport A/S 3+ | Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 70 | 63 |
| Category | Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ | Yokohama Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 61 |
| Dry | 75 | 50 |
| Wet | 79 | 60 |
| Snow | 63 | 56 |
| Comfort | 65 | 64 |
| Noise | – | 69 |
| Treadwear | 70 | 73 |
| Handling (owners) | 70 | 63 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Pilot Sport A/S 3+
Advan Sport AS
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ finished ahead 1 times and Yokohama Advan Sport AS 0 times.
| Discipline | Category | Pilot Sport A/S 3+ | Advan Sport AS | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tested Tread Life (Miles) | Treadwear | 73% | 100% | −26.7 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires · 225/40R18 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #2/19 | #9/19 | – | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires · 225/40R18 |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community members widely praise the Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ for its dry handling, wet grip, and substantial improvement in ride comfort over stock tires. However, several users express reservations about its poor traction in genuine snow conditions and note that road noise can become prominent as the tread wears. It is frequently compared against competitors like the Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 as well as its successor, the Pilot Sport All Season 4.
“I have had the Michelin Pilot sport A/S3+ for my last two sets of tires, and I had the hydro-edge before that on my old Toyota. So much grip around corners and good rain performance.”
“The Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ was amazing on my STI in cold and wet in the Seattle area. But I never had a chance to drive them on proper snow/ice, so I can't vouch for them in a northeast winter, unfortunately. :/”
“Are you talking about the all seasons or the summer tires? The summer tires are a terrible choice and you will likely go off the road at some point. Summer tires get hard as a rock in cold temps since they are not meant to be used in winter. If you're talking about the all seasons, I had Pilot Sport A/S 3+ on my 2016 S6 and they were just terrible in snow. So bad that I replaced them after only ~10k miles and put on some Conti Extreme Contact DWS, which were far superior in bad weather. If you want a true all season that can be useful in winter, I'd go with the Contis. But if you are going to be driving in bad weather regularly, get dedicated snows. All seasons are passable here and there but not confidence inspiring.”
Based on 47 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ | B · Yokohama Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All-Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | — | 11/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 440 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 50,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 psi |
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+
Yokohama Advan Sport AS
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ — better dry, wet and snow. Pick the Yokohama Advan Sport AS if treadwear matters most to you.
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ scores 75 vs 50 on dry.
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ scores 79 vs 60 on wet.
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ scores 63 vs 56 on snow.
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ scores 70 vs 63 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+, 79 vs 60 on our wet score.
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+, 75 vs 50 on our dry score.
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+, 63 vs 56 on our snow score.
Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 64 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Yokohama Advan Sport AS, 73 vs 70 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology