tirewheelguide

Toyo Proxes RA1 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 vs Toyo Proxes RA1 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 6 + 0 road tests and 23 + 11 owner reviews. How we score

Proxes RA1 leads, 69–67 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · Proxes RA1 or Pilot Sport Cup 2 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2
Tire AMichelin

Pilot Sport Cup 2

Summer

Tests 66 · 6 tests Owners 65 · 23 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2020 UHP, UUHP and Track Day Tyre Test (dry braking)

Toyo Proxes RA1
Tire BToyo

Proxes RA1

Summer Trackday and Competition tires

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 11 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 83

    Dry

    Pilot Sport Cup 2 +8
    75
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport Cup 2Proxes RA1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests84≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online8179

    Pilot Sport Cup 2: 60% × 83.7 + 40% × 80.9 = 83

    Proxes RA1: 60% × 72.1 (est.) + 40% × 78.5 = 75

    No road tests of dry for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 54

    Wet

    Proxes RA1 +10
    64
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport Cup 2Proxes RA1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests52≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online5861

    Pilot Sport Cup 2: 60% × 51.6 + 40% × 58.4 = 54

    Proxes RA1: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 64

    No road tests of wet for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    49
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport Cup 2Proxes RA1
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online–34

    Proxes RA1: 60% × 58.2 (est.) + 40% × 34.4 = 49

    No road tests of snow for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 55

    Comfort

    Proxes RA1 +12
    67
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport Cup 2Proxes RA1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests49≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6666

    Pilot Sport Cup 2: 60% × 48.5 + 40% × 65.6 = 55

    Proxes RA1: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 65.7 = 67

    No road tests of comfort for Proxes RA1. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 70

    Noise

    Pilot Sport Cup 2 +2
    68
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport Cup 2Proxes RA1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests71≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6870

    Pilot Sport Cup 2: 60% × 71 + 40% × 67.7 = 70

    Proxes RA1: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.1 = 68

    No road tests of noise for Proxes RA1. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 58

    Treadwear

    Proxes RA1 +9
    67
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport Cup 2Proxes RA1
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online5368

    Pilot Sport Cup 2: 60% × 61.6 (est.) + 40% × 52.7 = 58

    Proxes RA1: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 67.6 = 67

    No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Sport Cup 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 78

    Handling (owners)

    Pilot Sport Cup 2 +5
    73
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport Cup 2Proxes RA1
    Reviews found online7873
Scores at a glance
CategoryMichelin Pilot Sport Cup 2Toyo Proxes RA1
Relative Score 67 69
Dry 83 75
Wet 54 64
Snow – 49
Comfort 55 67
Noise 70 68
Treadwear 58 67
Handling (owners) 78 73

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Pilot Sport Cup 2

Proxes RA1

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Pilot Sport Cup 2

Pros

  • Phenomenal grip and stability in dry conditions
  • Exceptional steering precision and driver feedback
  • Strong, robust sidewalls providing great agility and balance

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear and short lifespan
  • High purchase price
  • Requires significant heat to achieve optimal grip, making them less ideal for cold or short road trips
All owner themes in the Pilot Sport Cup 2 review

Tire B Proxes RA1

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip that remains consistent even as the tread wears down.
  • Superior tire life compared to many other dedicated track-focused compounds.
  • Predictable breakaway characteristics that provide driver confidence at the limit.

Cons

  • Performance can become 'greasy' if the tire is overdriven or overheated during long sessions.
  • Requires proper heat cycling and break-in procedures to achieve optimal performance.
  • Sensitive to alignment settings, which can lead to accelerated or uneven wear if not managed.
All owner themes in the Proxes RA1 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 B · Toyo Proxes RA1
CategorySummerSummer Trackday and Competition tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available187
Rim diameters18″ – 21″15″ – 18″
Tread depth—8/32″
UTQG—100 AA A
Sidewall—Black Side Wall
Max pressure—44 psi
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2

Toyo Proxes RA1

Narrow edge: Toyo Proxes RA1 — better comfort, wet and treadwear. Pick the Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 if dry matters most to you. Toyo Proxes RA1 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Toyo Proxes RA1 scores 67 vs 55 on comfort.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Toyo Proxes RA1 scores 64 vs 54 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Toyo Proxes RA1 scores 67 vs 58 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 scores 83 vs 75 on dry.

Tire A · Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Toyo Proxes RA1
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Pilot Sport Cup 2 or Proxes RA1?

Which is better in the wet, Pilot Sport Cup 2 or Proxes RA1?

Toyo Proxes RA1, 64 vs 54 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Pilot Sport Cup 2 or Proxes RA1?

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2, 83 vs 75 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, Pilot Sport Cup 2 or Proxes RA1?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 68 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Pilot Sport Cup 2 or Proxes RA1?

Toyo Proxes RA1, 67 vs 55 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Pilot Sport Cup 2 or Proxes RA1?

Toyo Proxes RA1, 67 vs 58 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology