Tests 71 · 1 test Owners 63 · 25 reviews
Best test result: #6 of 9 in 2024 EV Tyre Test (dry handling)
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Pilot Sport EV is ahead, 66–61
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 71 · 1 test Owners 63 · 25 reviews
Best test result: #6 of 9 in 2024 EV Tyre Test (dry handling)
Tests 71 · 6 tests Owners 49 · 3,232 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 8 in 2026 Summer ECO Tyre Test (noise)
“Continental tyres falling apart Thoughts on this? Continental EcoContact 6 on a Ford Focus hatch, covered 10k miles of mild to moderate driving and both fronts are covered in chunks like the photos. Can’t recall driving on any particular surface or road recently that would have caused such damage. Date stamp is 2423 so almost bang on two years old. Looks like delamination to me but I’m no expert. Anyone seen anything like this before? Read more”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Pilot Sport EV | EcoContact 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 75 | 76 |
| Reviews found online | 67 | 49 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 94% | 95% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 98% | 100% |
| Source | Pilot Sport EV | EcoContact 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 71 | 53 |
| Reviews found online | 65 | 54 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 87% | 98% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 95% | 93% |
| Source | Pilot Sport EV | EcoContact 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 63 | 57 |
| Source | Pilot Sport EV | EcoContact 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 56 | 90 |
| Source | Pilot Sport EV | EcoContact 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 77 |
| Reviews found online | 55 | 41 |
| Source | Pilot Sport EV | EcoContact 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 64 | 50 |
| Category | Michelin Pilot Sport EV | Continental EcoContact 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 61 |
| Dry | 72 | 65 |
| Wet | 68 | 53 |
| Comfort | 66 | 63 |
| Noise | 60 | 81 |
| Treadwear | 59 | 63 |
| Handling | 64 | 50 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Pilot Sport EV
EcoContact 6
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Pilot Sport EV | EcoContact 6 | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Curved Aquaplaning | Curved | 82% #8/9 · 2024 EV Tyre Test | 94% #9/10 · 2022 ViBilagare Eco vs Normal Tyre Test | −11.4 | Different tests |
| Dry Braking | Dry | 94% #7/9 · 2024 EV Tyre Test | 95% #9/10 · 2022 AZ SUV Tyre Test | −1.0 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 98% #6/9 · 2024 EV Tyre Test | 100% #3/10 · 2022 AZ SUV Tyre Test | −1.5 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 96% #9/9 · 2024 EV Tyre Test | 100% #2/8 · 2026 Summer ECO Tyre Test | −3.8 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 43% #5/7 · 2025 Moottori EV Summer Tire Test R19 | 13% #8/10 · 2022 ViBilagare Eco vs Normal Tyre Test | +30.4 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 98% #8/9 · 2024 EV Tyre Test | 88% #10/10 · 2022 AZ SUV Tyre Test | +9.7 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 87% #7/9 · 2024 EV Tyre Test | 98% #6/10 · 2022 AZ SUV Tyre Test | −10.8 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 95% #7/9 · 2024 EV Tyre Test | 93% #8/10 · 2022 AZ SUV Tyre Test | +1.9 | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Community sentiment regarding the Continental Eco Contact 6 is overwhelmingly negative, with users frequently criticizing its poor wet weather grip, braking performance, and handling. While praised occasionally for low rolling resistance and energy efficiency, owners repeatedly report premature tread wear, cracking, and chunking or delamination under normal driving conditions.
“use up factory tires or replace them? asking for come clarity of mind. my (electric) car's factory tires are "not great", just ecocontact 6's that put efficiency over everything else basically, they are not directional and will probably last a long while because they are so hard. this winter i bought a set of pirelli winter 3's for my trip to norway but also for winter in general. those tires preform better on litteral ice than the ecocontact's do in the rain. its a striking difference. the pirellis handled a 13% incline of ice brilliantly and even actual blizzard conditions. (both i got on video as people didnt believe me) i am genuinely amazed what modern winter tires can do. but i am a bit torn on the choice between getting rid of basically brand new tires (they only did about 5k) and replacing them with something decent for the summer and having tires that actually work when its wet or stop when i need them to or keep driving them until the ones i got are worn out. to be clear, i dont give a crap about the effiicency or really the lifespan of tires. braking and wet performance is vastly more important to me than saving a Watt. saving energy nor lifespan isnt a great comfort when i'm sliding into another car or tree. would getting something decent make such a big difference to warrant the cost and waste or am i better off to just run these down first? edit: sidenote, the car in question is a Renault 5. its got a pretty weird tire size (195/55R18) that limits options a bit”
“Desgaste anormal Continental EcoContact 6 Q — BMW X3 BMW X3 (~72.000 km, cerca de 1 ano e pouco). Já trocou os 4 pneus uma vez e vai agora para o segundo jogo. O primeiro conjunto começou a escamar / sair aos bocados (principalmente à frente). A marca assumiu e colocou pneus iguais (Continental EcoContact 6 Q). Agora, ao fim de cerca de 20.000 km, está a acontecer exatamente o mesmo à frente. Para piorar, após notar perda de pressão lenta atrás, fomos verificar e os dois pneus traseiros estão completamente comidos por dentro. Mais alguém com problemas crónicos de desgaste prematuro com este modelo de pneu ou comportamento semelhante no X3? Read more”
“Used Continental EcoContact 6 I have recently bought a G31 from 2022 which came with winter tires. Therefor I have bought summer tires which are used and were advertised as 5,5mm profile depth on each tire. I have measured each tire and am wondering which tire should be installed on which side and if front or rear would be better. Unfortunately there is no mark to show on which position they were on the previous owners car. Starting from outside moving inside I have measured the following millimetres: Tire 1: 5.51, 5.69, 5.85, 5.36 Tire 2: 5.40, 5.58, 5.71, 5.33 Tire 3: 5.59, 5.69, 5.79, 5.39 Tire 4: 5.38, 5.55, 5.73, 5.34 Seeing the numbers I would go with tire 2 and 4 on one axis und 1 and 3 on the other. Would that be a good idea and where should each pair go, front or rear? Is this even important at this low difference? I am happy for any advise. Thanks. Read more”
Based on 29 community posts
| Attribute | A · Michelin Pilot Sport EV | B · Continental EcoContact 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 28 | 104 |
| Rim diameters | 19″ – 22″ | 13″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 7/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 320 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Michelin Pilot Sport EV
Continental EcoContact 6
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport EV — better wet, handling and dry. Pick the Continental EcoContact 6 if noise and treadwear matter most to you.
Continental EcoContact 6 scores 81 vs 60 on noise.
Michelin Pilot Sport EV scores 68 vs 53 on wet.
Michelin Pilot Sport EV scores 64 vs 50 on handling.
Michelin Pilot Sport EV scores 72 vs 65 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.