Tests 71 · 1 test Owners 61 · 26 reviews
Michelin Pilot Sport EV vs Continental EcoContact 6 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 6 road tests and 26 + 3,266 owner reviews. How we score
Pilot Sport EV is ahead, 66–58
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 71 · 6 tests Owners 43 · 3,266 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (noise)
“For efficiency I would recommend continental ecocontact 6/7. I get around 11kw/100km in the city and 14-15kw/100km on the highway. Would recommend. RWD 19 inch wheels Not very good on a rainy road tho”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
71
Dry
Pilot Sport EV +764Why this score
Source Pilot Sport EV EcoContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 5 tests 75 77 Reviews found online 66 45 Pilot Sport EV: 60% × 75.2 + 40% × 65.7 = 71
EcoContact 6: 60% × 76.9 + 40% × 45.3 = 64
-
68
Wet
Pilot Sport EV +1751Why this score
Source Pilot Sport EV EcoContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 5 tests 71 53 Reviews found online 63 47 Pilot Sport EV: 60% × 70.7 + 40% × 63.4 = 68
EcoContact 6: 60% × 53.4 + 40% × 47.4 = 51
-
64
Comfort
Pilot Sport EV +856Why this score
Source Pilot Sport EV EcoContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 61 49 Pilot Sport EV: 40% × 67.2 (est.) + 60% × 61.2 = 64
EcoContact 6: 40% × 64.8 (est.) + 60% × 49.4 = 56
No road tests of comfort for Pilot Sport EV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for EcoContact 6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
60
Noise
EcoContact 6 +1878Why this score
Source Pilot Sport EV EcoContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 3 tests 56 85 Reviews found online ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Pilot Sport EV: 60% × 56.1 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 60
EcoContact 6: 60% × 85.3 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 78
No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Sport EV or EcoContact 6. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
58
Treadwear
EcoContact 6 +260Why this score
Source Pilot Sport EV EcoContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 61 (est.) 79 Reviews found online 52 32 Pilot Sport EV: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.1 = 58
EcoContact 6: 60% × 79.2 + 40% × 32 = 60
No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Sport EV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
64
Handling (owners)
Pilot Sport EV +1945Why this score
Source Pilot Sport EV EcoContact 6 Reviews found online 64 45 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison100Why this score
Source Pilot Sport EV EcoContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests – 100
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Pilot Sport EV | Continental EcoContact 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 58 |
| Dry | 71 | 64 |
| Wet | 68 | 51 |
| Comfort | 64 | 56 |
| Noise | 60 | 78 |
| Treadwear | 58 | 60 |
| Handling (owners) | 64 | 45 |
| Efficiency | – | 100 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Pilot Sport EV
EcoContact 6
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Pilot Sport EV | EcoContact 6 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 94% #7/9 · 2024 EV Tyre Test | 96% #3/8 · 2026 Summer ECO Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 98% #6/9 · 2024 EV Tyre Test | 100% #2/8 · 2026 Summer ECO Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Curved Aquaplaning | Wet | 82% #8/9 · 2024 EV Tyre Test | 67% #8/8 · 2026 Summer ECO Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 98% #8/9 · 2024 EV Tyre Test | 89% #8/8 · 2026 Summer ECO Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 87% #7/9 · 2024 EV Tyre Test | 83% #7/8 · 2026 Summer ECO Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 95% #7/9 · 2024 EV Tyre Test | 94% #8/8 · 2026 Summer ECO Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 96% #9/9 · 2024 EV Tyre Test | 100% #2/8 · 2026 Summer ECO Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #5/7 2025 Moottori EV Summer Tire Test R19 | #6/8 2026 Auto Motor Und Sport Summer Tire Test R17 | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Pilot Sport EV
Pros
- Exceptional treadwear and longevity, with many users reporting 20,000 to over 50,000 miles of use
- Strong dry grip and responsive handling capable of managing high-torque EV outputs
- High level of ride comfort and smooth road feedback
Cons
- Unpredictable and severely compromised wet-weather traction, described by some as feeling like driving on ice
- High price point relative to competing performance tires
- Occasional reports of internal acoustic foam coming loose and causing vibration or balancing issues
Tire B EcoContact 6
Pros
- Excellent fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance
- Low road noise and high cabin comfort
- Good dry grip and stable handling under normal driving conditions
Cons
- Rapid and premature tread wear, especially on drive wheels
- Subpar wet-weather grip and high susceptibility to aquaplaning
- Shallow initial tread depth out of the box (approx. 6.0-6.5mm)
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Michelin Pilot Sport EV
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Continental EcoContact 6
Community sentiment regarding the Continental Eco Contact 6 is overwhelmingly negative, with users frequently criticizing its poor wet weather grip, braking performance, and handling. While praised occasionally for low rolling resistance and energy efficiency, owners repeatedly report premature tread wear, cracking, and chunking or delamination under normal driving conditions.
“Desgaste anormal Continental EcoContact 6 Q — BMW X3 BMW X3 (~72.000 km, cerca de 1 ano e pouco). Já trocou os 4 pneus uma vez e vai agora para o segundo jogo. O primeiro conjunto começou a escamar / sair aos bocados (principalmente à frente). A marca assumiu e colocou pneus iguais (Continental EcoContact 6 Q). Agora, ao fim de cerca de 20.000 km, está a acontecer exatamente o mesmo à frente. Para piorar, após notar perda de pressão lenta atrás, fomos verificar e os dois pneus traseiros estão completamente comidos por dentro. Mais alguém com problemas crónicos de desgaste prematuro com este modelo de pneu ou comportamento semelhante no X3? Read more”
“use up factory tires or replace them? asking for come clarity of mind. my (electric) car's factory tires are "not great", just ecocontact 6's that put efficiency over everything else basically, they are not directional and will probably last a long while because they are so hard. this winter i bought a set of pirelli winter 3's for my trip to norway but also for winter in general. those tires preform better on litteral ice than the ecocontact's do in the rain. its a striking difference. the pirellis handled a 13% incline of ice brilliantly and even actual blizzard conditions. (both i got on video as people didnt believe me) i am genuinely amazed what modern winter tires can do. but i am a bit torn on the choice between getting rid of basically brand new tires (they only did about 5k) and replacing them with something decent for the summer and having tires that actually work when its wet or stop when i need them to or keep driving them until the ones i got are worn out. to be clear, i dont give a crap about the effiicency or really the lifespan of tires. braking and wet performance is vastly more important to me than saving a Watt. saving energy nor lifespan isnt a great comfort when i'm sliding into another car or tree. would getting something decent make such a big difference to warrant the cost and waste or am i better off to just run these down first? edit: sidenote, the car in question is a Renault 5. its got a pretty weird tire size (195/55R18) that limits options a bit”
“Used Continental EcoContact 6 I have recently bought a G31 from 2022 which came with winter tires. Therefor I have bought summer tires which are used and were advertised as 5,5mm profile depth on each tire. I have measured each tire and am wondering which tire should be installed on which side and if front or rear would be better. Unfortunately there is no mark to show on which position they were on the previous owners car. Starting from outside moving inside I have measured the following millimetres: Tire 1: 5.51, 5.69, 5.85, 5.36 Tire 2: 5.40, 5.58, 5.71, 5.33 Tire 3: 5.59, 5.69, 5.79, 5.39 Tire 4: 5.38, 5.55, 5.73, 5.34 Seeing the numbers I would go with tire 2 and 4 on one axis und 1 and 3 on the other. Would that be a good idea and where should each pair go, front or rear? Is this even important at this low difference? I am happy for any advise. Thanks. Read more”
Based on 29 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Pilot Sport EV | B · Continental EcoContact 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 28 | 104 |
| Rim diameters | 19″ – 22″ | 13″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 7/32″ |
| UTQG | 220 - 320 AA - B A | 320 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 9 | 9 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Michelin Pilot Sport EV
Continental EcoContact 6
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport EV — better handling, wet and comfort. Pick the Continental EcoContact 6 if noise matters most to you.
Michelin Pilot Sport EV scores 64 vs 45 on handling.
Continental EcoContact 6 scores 78 vs 60 on noise.
Michelin Pilot Sport EV scores 68 vs 51 on wet.
Michelin Pilot Sport EV scores 64 vs 56 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Pilot Sport EV or EcoContact 6?
Which is better in the wet, Pilot Sport EV or EcoContact 6?
Michelin Pilot Sport EV, 68 vs 51 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Pilot Sport EV or EcoContact 6?
Michelin Pilot Sport EV, 71 vs 64 on our dry score.
Which is quieter, Pilot Sport EV or EcoContact 6?
Continental EcoContact 6, 78 vs 60 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Pilot Sport EV or EcoContact 6?
Michelin Pilot Sport EV, 64 vs 56 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Pilot Sport EV or EcoContact 6?
Neither, by our numbers: 58 vs 60 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology