Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 12 reviews
Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP vs Michelin Pilot Super Sport — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 12 + 1,507 owner reviews. How we score
Pilot Super Sport is ahead, 78–72
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 75 · 1 test Owners 82 · 1,507 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2017 Motor Mag UHP Tyre Test (dry handling)
“Damn. 295s on Style 359Ms? That's pushing it a bit, isn't it? I so desperately wish Michelin would make a 285/30 PSS. I'm running 275/35s now, and while I like the extra rubber on the road, I don't like the increased sidewall height over the OEM 265/35.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
73
Dry
Pilot Super Sport +982Why this score
Source Pilot Sport PS2 ZP Pilot Super Sport Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 71 (est.) 77 Reviews found online 76 90 Pilot Sport PS2 ZP: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 75.5 = 73
Pilot Super Sport: 60% × 77.5 + 40% × 89.7 = 82
No road tests of dry for Pilot Sport PS2 ZP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
75
Wet
Pilot Super Sport +277Why this score
Source Pilot Sport PS2 ZP Pilot Super Sport Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 74 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 77 84 Pilot Sport PS2 ZP: 60% × 74.1 (est.) + 40% × 76.8 = 75
Pilot Super Sport: 60% × 73 + 40% × 83.8 = 77
No road tests of wet for Pilot Sport PS2 ZP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
68
Comfort
Pilot Super Sport +674Why this score
Source Pilot Sport PS2 ZP Pilot Super Sport Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 68 76 Pilot Sport PS2 ZP: 40% × 68.5 (est.) + 60% × 67.6 = 68
Pilot Super Sport: 40% × 70.3 (est.) + 60% × 76.2 = 74
No road tests of comfort for Pilot Sport PS2 ZP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Pilot Super Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
64
Treadwear
Pilot Super Sport +670Why this score
Source Pilot Sport PS2 ZP Pilot Super Sport Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 62 73 Pilot Sport PS2 ZP: 60% × 64.8 (est.) + 40% × 61.6 = 64
Pilot Super Sport: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.8 = 70
No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Sport PS2 ZP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Super Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
73
Handling (owners)
Pilot Super Sport +1083Why this score
Source Pilot Sport PS2 ZP Pilot Super Sport Reviews found online 73 83
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP | Michelin Pilot Super Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 78 |
| Dry | 73 | 82 |
| Wet | 75 | 77 |
| Comfort | 68 | 74 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 70 |
| Handling (owners) | 73 | 83 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Pilot Sport PS2 ZP
Pilot Super Sport
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Pilot Sport PS2 ZP
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet grip with a glued-to-the-road feel
- Improved ride comfort and lower cabin noise compared to standard run-flats
- Predictable handling with gentle breakaway characteristics near limits
Cons
- Stiff or rock-hard ride quality when kept at recommended manufacturer pressures
- Softer sidewalls can introduce a spongy or wobbly feel during rapid direction changes on certain vehicles
- Frustrating warranty terms for staggered setups
Tire B Pilot Super Sport
Pros
- Phenomenal dry grip and cornering stability
- Precise steering response and excellent road feedback
- Better-than-expected tread wear and mileage for a performance tire
Cons
- Reduced grip and traction in cold weather (below 15°C)
- Mediocre performance and tendency to aquaplane when tread wears down in heavy rain
- High price point compared to some alternatives
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Michelin Pilot Super Sport
The Michelin Pilot Super Sport is widely praised by the community as a benchmark high-performance street tire offering outstanding dry grip, sharp cornering capability, and decent ride comfort for daily driving. Many drivers note that its successor, the Pilot Sport 4S, improves upon it—especially in cold and wet conditions—while several users highlight downsides such as poor winter/snow capability, premium pricing, and eventual rubber degradation or tread cracking as the tires age.
“I switched to Pilot Super Sports a couple months ago and can say there is some noise reduction. So far they are holding up pretty well, probably better than the RE50A considering I did a fair bit of auto crossing with it. Biggest difference I noticed was grip, significantly more grip especially when abused (hot). I also went 255 up front so that may have had an effect on the grip as well. They are also more comfortable over rough surfaces.”
“Damn. 295s on Style 359Ms? That's pushing it a bit, isn't it? I so desperately wish Michelin would make a 285/30 PSS. I'm running 275/35s now, and while I like the extra rubber on the road, I don't like the increased sidewall height over the OEM 265/35.”
“Worth bearing in mind the Sam Vimes "Boots" Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness. The tires I got on my new '17 RF GT didn't last very long, the two sets of cheap tires I replaced them with didn't either, then I put Michelin Pilot Super Sport tires on it and they're great performers as well as outlasting the earlier sets combined.”
Based on 364 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP | B · Michelin Pilot Super Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Max Performance tires | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 50 |
| Rim diameters | — | 17″ – 23″ |
| UTQG | — | 300 AA A |
Which one should you actually buy?
Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP
Michelin Pilot Super Sport
Winner: Michelin Pilot Super Sport — better handling, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin Pilot Super Sport scores 83 vs 73 on handling.
Michelin Pilot Super Sport scores 82 vs 73 on dry.
Michelin Pilot Super Sport scores 74 vs 68 on comfort.
Michelin Pilot Super Sport scores 70 vs 64 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Pilot Sport PS2 ZP or Pilot Super Sport?
Which is better in the wet, Pilot Sport PS2 ZP or Pilot Super Sport?
Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 77 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Pilot Sport PS2 ZP or Pilot Super Sport?
Michelin Pilot Super Sport, 82 vs 73 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Pilot Sport PS2 ZP or Pilot Super Sport?
Michelin Pilot Super Sport, 74 vs 68 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Pilot Sport PS2 ZP or Pilot Super Sport?
Michelin Pilot Super Sport, 70 vs 64 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology