Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP vs Yokohama Advan A050 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 12 + 6 owner reviews. How we score

Pilot Sport PS2 ZP is ahead, 73–62

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Yokohama Advan A050
Tire BYokohama

Advan A050

Summer

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 55 · 6 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 75

    Dry

    Pilot Sport PS2 ZP +2
    73
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport PS2 ZPAdvan A050
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7975

    Pilot Sport PS2 ZP: 60% × 72.2 (est.) + 40% × 78.9 = 75

    Advan A050: 60% × 70.7 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 73

    No road tests of dry for Pilot Sport PS2 ZP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Advan A050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 76

    Wet

    Pilot Sport PS2 ZP +19
    57
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport PS2 ZPAdvan A050
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 75 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online7852

    Pilot Sport PS2 ZP: 60% × 74.5 (est.) + 40% × 78.2 = 76

    Advan A050: 60% × 59.7 (est.) + 40% × 51.8 = 57

    No road tests of wet for Pilot Sport PS2 ZP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Advan A050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 70

    Comfort

    Pilot Sport PS2 ZP +6
    64
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport PS2 ZPAdvan A050
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7059

    Pilot Sport PS2 ZP: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.1 = 70

    Advan A050: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 59.3 = 64

    No road tests of comfort for Pilot Sport PS2 ZP or Advan A050. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 69

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport PS2 ZPAdvan A050
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online71–

    Pilot Sport PS2 ZP: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.5 = 69

    No road tests of noise for Pilot Sport PS2 ZP. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 65

    Treadwear

    Pilot Sport PS2 ZP +18
    47
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport PS2 ZPAdvan A050
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 56 (est.)
    Reviews found online6433

    Pilot Sport PS2 ZP: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 64.2 = 65

    Advan A050: 60% × 55.6 (est.) + 40% × 33.1 = 47

    No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Sport PS2 ZP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Advan A050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  6. 77

    Handling (owners)

    Pilot Sport PS2 ZP +4
    73
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport PS2 ZPAdvan A050
    Reviews found online7773
Scores at a glance
Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP vs Yokohama Advan A050: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZPYokohama Advan A050
Relative Score 73 62
Dry 75 73
Wet 76 57
Comfort 70 64
Noise 69 –
Treadwear 65 47
Handling (owners) 77 73

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Pilot Sport PS2 ZP

Advan A050

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Pilot Sport PS2 ZP

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet grip with a glued-to-the-road feel
  • Improved ride comfort and lower cabin noise compared to standard run-flats
  • Predictable handling with gentle breakaway characteristics near limits

Cons

  • Stiff or rock-hard ride quality when kept at recommended manufacturer pressures
  • Softer sidewalls can introduce a spongy or wobbly feel during rapid direction changes on certain vehicles
  • Frustrating warranty terms for staggered setups
All owner themes in the Pilot Sport PS2 ZP review

Tire B Advan A050

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and track-day performance
  • Predictable and communicative handling characteristics
  • Consistent grip levels maintained throughout the tire's life

Cons

  • Very high price point compared to competitors
  • Rapid tread wear, particularly in softer compounds
  • Poor performance and safety risks in wet or cold conditions
All owner themes in the Advan A050 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP B · Yokohama Advan A050
CategorySummer Max Performance tiresSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP

Yokohama Advan A050

Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP — better wet, treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Yokohama Advan A050 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP scores 76 vs 57 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP scores 65 vs 47 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP scores 70 vs 64 on comfort.

Tire A · Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP
Tire B · Yokohama Advan A050

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Pilot Sport PS2 ZP or Advan A050?

Which is better in the wet, Pilot Sport PS2 ZP or Advan A050?

Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP, 76 vs 57 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Pilot Sport PS2 ZP or Advan A050?

Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 73 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Pilot Sport PS2 ZP or Advan A050?

Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP, 70 vs 64 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Pilot Sport PS2 ZP or Advan A050?

Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP, 65 vs 47 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology