Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 12 reviews
Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP vs Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 4 road tests and 12 + 2,189 owner reviews. How we score
Pilot Sport PS2 ZP leads, 73–70 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 73 · 4 tests Owners 58 · 2,189 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))
“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
75
Dry
Pilot Sport PS2 ZP +174Why this score
Source Pilot Sport PS2 ZP ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 72 (est.) 77 Reviews found online 79 69 Pilot Sport PS2 ZP: 60% × 72.2 (est.) + 40% × 78.9 = 75
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 77.5 + 40% × 68.5 = 74
No road tests of dry for Pilot Sport PS2 ZP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
76
Wet
Pilot Sport PS2 ZP +868Why this score
Source Pilot Sport PS2 ZP ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 75 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 78 65 Pilot Sport PS2 ZP: 60% × 74.5 (est.) + 40% × 78.2 = 76
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 70 + 40% × 65.2 = 68
No road tests of wet for Pilot Sport PS2 ZP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
–
Snow
No comparison34Why this score
Source Pilot Sport PS2 ZP ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 50 (est.) Reviews found online – 10 ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 50.2 (est.) + 40% × 10.4 = 34
No road tests of snow for ADVAN Fleva V701. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
70
Comfort
Pilot Sport PS2 ZP +763Why this score
Source Pilot Sport PS2 ZP ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 62 Reviews found online 70 63 Pilot Sport PS2 ZP: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.1 = 70
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 62.5 + 40% × 63.3 = 63
No road tests of comfort for Pilot Sport PS2 ZP. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
69
Noise
ADVAN Fleva V701 +170Why this score
Source Pilot Sport PS2 ZP ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 75 Reviews found online 71 62 Pilot Sport PS2 ZP: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.5 = 69
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 74.7 + 40% × 61.8 = 70
No road tests of noise for Pilot Sport PS2 ZP. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Treadwear
ADVAN Fleva V701 +469Why this score
Source Pilot Sport PS2 ZP ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 65 (est.) 74 Reviews found online 64 61 Pilot Sport PS2 ZP: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 64.2 = 65
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 74.1 + 40% × 60.8 = 69
No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Sport PS2 ZP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
77
Handling (owners)
Pilot Sport PS2 ZP +671Why this score
Source Pilot Sport PS2 ZP ADVAN Fleva V701 Reviews found online 77 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP | Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 70 |
| Dry | 75 | 74 |
| Wet | 76 | 68 |
| Snow | – | 34 |
| Comfort | 70 | 63 |
| Noise | 69 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 69 |
| Handling (owners) | 77 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Pilot Sport PS2 ZP
ADVAN Fleva V701
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Pilot Sport PS2 ZP
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet grip with a glued-to-the-road feel
- Improved ride comfort and lower cabin noise compared to standard run-flats
- Predictable handling with gentle breakaway characteristics near limits
Cons
- Stiff or rock-hard ride quality when kept at recommended manufacturer pressures
- Softer sidewalls can introduce a spongy or wobbly feel during rapid direction changes on certain vehicles
- Frustrating warranty terms for staggered setups
Tire B ADVAN Fleva V701
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
- Noticeably quieter and more comfortable than many competing UHP tires
- Precise steering response and good road feedback
Cons
- Faster-than-average tread wear reported by aggressive drivers
- Some complaints regarding soft sidewalls leading to initial turn-in delay or tramlining
- Occasional reports of elevated road noise depending on the vehicle and road surface
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Community discussions around the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 primarily consist of prospective buyers asking about daily drivability, treadwear longevity, and value compared to premium alternatives. Those considering or using them note solid availability in smaller or niche wheel sizes and appreciate their accessible price point. The limited direct experiential feedback praises responsive turn-in, stiffer sidewalls, and decent ride comfort compared to rival sporty summer tires.
“Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 in 2026 Do they make sense today? I’d put them on a hatchback (1300kg) and I usually drive up to 180-200 km/h with quick accelerations and curves in my daily. Weather is usually sunny, but sometimes it rains. Are them still a safe and a good choice, or are there some other brands that should result better for my driving style (and for my 215/45 r18 rims)? Thanks in advance.”
“Yokohama advan fleva v701? Currently looking at stock sizes for my 99 MRS and the v701s are the only decent set I can find. I live in Canada and I was planning on ordering them for next week, and just thought to do one more validation check before driving out to Bellingham. Pretty new to picking out my own tires, trying to also stay within 550-600usd or maxish 800-850cad including tax if possible.”
“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”
Based on 22 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP | B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Max Performance tires | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 70 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 300 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Narrow edge: Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP — better wet, comfort and handling. Pick the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 if treadwear matters most to you. Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP scores 76 vs 68 on wet.
Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP scores 70 vs 63 on comfort.
Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP scores 77 vs 71 on handling.
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 69 vs 65 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Pilot Sport PS2 ZP or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Which is better in the wet, Pilot Sport PS2 ZP or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP, 76 vs 68 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Pilot Sport PS2 ZP or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 74 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, Pilot Sport PS2 ZP or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 70 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Pilot Sport PS2 ZP or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP, 70 vs 63 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Pilot Sport PS2 ZP or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 69 vs 65 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology