Tests 67 · 1 test Owners 67 · 2 reviews
Michelin Power Cup Evo looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
Michelin Power Cup Evo vs Michelin Power GP — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 2 + 6 owner reviews. How we score
Power GP is ahead, 78–68
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
Power GP +1280Why this score
Source Power Cup Evo Power GP Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 67 ≈ 76 (est.) Reviews found online 70 86 Power Cup Evo: 60% × 67.1 + 40% × 69.7 = 68
Power GP: 60% × 75.7 (est.) + 40% × 86.2 = 80
No road tests of dry for Power GP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
70
Wet
Power GP +777Why this score
Source Power Cup Evo Power GP Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 76 (est.) Reviews found online 69 80 Power Cup Evo: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 69.2 = 70
Power GP: 60% × 75.7 (est.) + 40% × 79.7 = 77
No road tests of wet for Power Cup Evo. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Power GP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
68
Comfort
Power GP +1078Why this score
Source Power Cup Evo Power GP Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 68 82 Power Cup Evo: 40% × 68.8 (est.) + 60% × 67.5 = 68
Power GP: 40% × 71.4 (est.) + 60% × 81.7 = 78
No road tests of comfort for Power Cup Evo or Power GP. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
64
Treadwear
Power GP +872Why this score
Source Power Cup Evo Power GP Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 63 75 Power Cup Evo: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 62.7 = 64
Power GP: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 72
No road tests of treadwear for Power Cup Evo. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Power GP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
70
Handling (owners)
Power GP +1585Why this score
Source Power Cup Evo Power GP Reviews found online 70 85
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Power Cup Evo | Michelin Power GP |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 78 |
| Dry | 68 | 80 |
| Wet | 70 | 77 |
| Comfort | 68 | 78 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 72 |
| Handling (owners) | 70 | 85 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
68
/ 100
Power Cup Evo
78
/ 100
Power GP
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Power Cup Evo
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and handling characteristics
- Performance comparable to dedicated slick tires
- Strong suitability for high-performance chassis setups
Cons
- Limited wet weather performance compared to all-season or dedicated wet-weather tires
- Performance gap when compared to more versatile street-focused tires like the Pilot Sport 4S
- Potential for rapid wear depending on the intensity of the driving style
Tire B Power GP
Pros
- Rapid warm-up time providing immediate confidence
- Exceptional dry grip and predictable feedback
- Superior performance in damp or wet conditions compared to competitors
Cons
- Limited tread life, with some users reporting replacement intervals between 5,000 and 6,000 kilometers
- Potential for uneven wear or cupping on the tire edges
- High performance focus may not suit riders prioritizing maximum longevity
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Power Cup Evo | B · Michelin Power GP |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Which one should you actually buy?
68
/ 100
Michelin Power Cup Evo
78
/ 100
Michelin Power GP
Winner: Michelin Power GP — better handling, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Power Cup Evo rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 2 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Michelin Power GP rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Power GP scores 85 vs 70 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin Power GP scores 80 vs 68 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin Power GP scores 78 vs 68 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Power GP scores 72 vs 64 on treadwear.
Tire A · Michelin Power Cup Evo
Tire B · Michelin Power GP
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Power Cup Evo or Power GP?
Which is better in the wet, Power Cup Evo or Power GP?
Michelin Power GP, 77 vs 70 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Power Cup Evo or Power GP?
Michelin Power GP, 80 vs 68 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Power Cup Evo or Power GP?
Michelin Power GP, 78 vs 68 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Power Cup Evo or Power GP?
Michelin Power GP, 72 vs 64 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology