Michelin Power Cup Evo looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Battlax Hypersport S22 vs Michelin Power Cup Evo — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 16 + 2 owner reviews. How we score

Battlax Hypersport S22 leads, 71–68 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 75

    Dry

    Battlax Hypersport S22 +7
    68
    Why this score
    SourceBattlax Hypersport S22Power Cup Evo
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 72 (est.)67
    Reviews found online7969

    Battlax Hypersport S22: 60% × 72.3 (est.) + 40% × 78.6 = 75

    Power Cup Evo: 60% × 67 + 40% × 69.2 = 68

    No road tests of dry for Battlax Hypersport S22. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 71

    Wet

    Battlax Hypersport S22 +2
    69
    Why this score
    SourceBattlax Hypersport S22Power Cup Evo
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7269

    Battlax Hypersport S22: 60% × 71.2 (est.) + 40% × 71.6 = 71

    Power Cup Evo: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 69 = 69

    No road tests of wet for Battlax Hypersport S22. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Power Cup Evo. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 69

    Comfort

    Battlax Hypersport S22 +2
    67
    Why this score
    SourceBattlax Hypersport S22Power Cup Evo
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7067

    Battlax Hypersport S22: 40% × 68.8 (est.) + 60% × 69.6 = 69

    Power Cup Evo: 40% × 68.3 (est.) + 60% × 66.9 = 67

    No road tests of comfort for Battlax Hypersport S22. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Power Cup Evo. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. 60

    Treadwear

    Power Cup Evo +4
    64
    Why this score
    SourceBattlax Hypersport S22Power Cup Evo
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online5663

    Battlax Hypersport S22: 60% × 62.7 (est.) + 40% × 56 = 60

    Power Cup Evo: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 62.9 = 64

    No road tests of treadwear for Battlax Hypersport S22. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Power Cup Evo. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  5. 78

    Handling (owners)

    Battlax Hypersport S22 +9
    69
    Why this score
    SourceBattlax Hypersport S22Power Cup Evo
    Reviews found online7869
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Battlax Hypersport S22 vs Michelin Power Cup Evo: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Battlax Hypersport S22Michelin Power Cup Evo
Relative Score 71 68
Dry 75 68
Wet 71 69
Comfort 69 67
Treadwear 60 64
Handling (owners) 78 69

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Battlax Hypersport S22

± 9

Power Cup Evo

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Battlax Hypersport S22

Pros

  • Outstanding dry grip and cornering stability
  • Quick and effortless turn-in response with great line precision
  • Impressive wet weather performance and stability for a hypersport tire

Cons

  • Rapid rear tire wear and quick center flat-spotting on straight roads
  • Shorter overall tread life compared to some competing sport tires
  • Occasional reports of reduced grip or sliding in wet conditions or when cold
All owner themes in the Battlax Hypersport S22 review

Tire B Power Cup Evo

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and handling characteristics
  • Performance comparable to dedicated slick tires
  • Strong suitability for high-performance chassis setups

Cons

  • Limited wet weather performance compared to all-season or dedicated wet-weather tires
  • Performance gap when compared to more versatile street-focused tires like the Pilot Sport 4S
  • Potential for rapid wear depending on the intensity of the driving style
All owner themes in the Power Cup Evo review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Battlax Hypersport S22 B · Michelin Power Cup Evo
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typeMotorcycleMotorcycle

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Battlax Hypersport S22

Michelin Power Cup Evo

Narrow edge: Bridgestone Battlax Hypersport S22 — better handling and dry. Pick the Michelin Power Cup Evo if treadwear matters most to you. Bridgestone Battlax Hypersport S22 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Michelin Power Cup Evo rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 2 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Bridgestone Battlax Hypersport S22 scores 78 vs 69 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Bridgestone Battlax Hypersport S22 scores 75 vs 68 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Michelin Power Cup Evo scores 64 vs 60 on treadwear.

Tire A · Bridgestone Battlax Hypersport S22
Tire B · Michelin Power Cup Evo

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Battlax Hypersport S22 or Power Cup Evo?

Which is better in the wet, Battlax Hypersport S22 or Power Cup Evo?

Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 69 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Battlax Hypersport S22 or Power Cup Evo?

Bridgestone Battlax Hypersport S22, 75 vs 68 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Battlax Hypersport S22 or Power Cup Evo?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 67 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Battlax Hypersport S22 or Power Cup Evo?

Michelin Power Cup Evo, 64 vs 60 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology