Tests 67 · 1 test Owners 67 · 2 reviews
Michelin Power Cup Evo looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Michelin Power Cup Evo vs Pirelli Diablo Supercorsa — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 2 + 13 owner reviews. How we score
Power Cup Evo is ahead, 68–58
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 53 · 13 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
Power Cup Evo +266Why this score
Source Power Cup Evo Diablo Supercorsa Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 67 ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 69 64 Power Cup Evo: 60% × 67 + 40% × 69.2 = 68
Diablo Supercorsa: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.3 = 66
No road tests of dry for Diablo Supercorsa. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
69
Wet
Power Cup Evo +1752Why this score
Source Power Cup Evo Diablo Supercorsa Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 57 (est.) Reviews found online 69 45 Power Cup Evo: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 68.9 = 69
Diablo Supercorsa: 60% × 56.7 (est.) + 40% × 45.2 = 52
No road tests of wet for Power Cup Evo. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Diablo Supercorsa. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
67
Comfort
Power Cup Evo +661Why this score
Source Power Cup Evo Diablo Supercorsa Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 67 58 Power Cup Evo: 40% × 68.3 (est.) + 60% × 66.8 = 67
Diablo Supercorsa: 40% × 66.5 (est.) + 60% × 57.9 = 61
No road tests of comfort for Power Cup Evo. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Diablo Supercorsa. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
64
Treadwear
Power Cup Evo +1153Why this score
Source Power Cup Evo Diablo Supercorsa Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 59 (est.) Reviews found online 63 44 Power Cup Evo: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 62.9 = 64
Diablo Supercorsa: 60% × 58.6 (est.) + 40% × 44.2 = 53
No road tests of treadwear for Power Cup Evo. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Diablo Supercorsa. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
69
Handling (owners)
Power Cup Evo +663Why this score
Source Power Cup Evo Diablo Supercorsa Reviews found online 69 63
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Power Cup Evo | Pirelli Diablo Supercorsa |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 58 |
| Dry | 68 | 66 |
| Wet | 69 | 52 |
| Comfort | 67 | 61 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 53 |
| Handling (owners) | 69 | 63 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Power Cup Evo
Diablo Supercorsa
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Power Cup Evo
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and handling characteristics
- Performance comparable to dedicated slick tires
- Strong suitability for high-performance chassis setups
Cons
- Limited wet weather performance compared to all-season or dedicated wet-weather tires
- Performance gap when compared to more versatile street-focused tires like the Pilot Sport 4S
- Potential for rapid wear depending on the intensity of the driving style
Tire B Diablo Supercorsa
Pros
- Exceptional dry weather grip and cornering stability
- Precise steering feedback and handling characteristics
- Highly effective for track-day use and aggressive riding
Cons
- Extremely short tread life, particularly on high-torque motorcycles
- Poor performance and lack of confidence in wet or damp conditions
- High price point relative to the rapid rate of wear
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Power Cup Evo | B · Pirelli Diablo Supercorsa |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Which one should you actually buy?
Michelin Power Cup Evo
Pirelli Diablo Supercorsa
Winner: Michelin Power Cup Evo — better wet, treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Power Cup Evo rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 2 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Pirelli Diablo Supercorsa rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 13 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin Power Cup Evo scores 69 vs 52 on wet.
Michelin Power Cup Evo scores 64 vs 53 on treadwear.
Michelin Power Cup Evo scores 67 vs 61 on comfort.
Michelin Power Cup Evo scores 69 vs 63 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Power Cup Evo or Diablo Supercorsa?
Which is better in the wet, Power Cup Evo or Diablo Supercorsa?
Michelin Power Cup Evo, 69 vs 52 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Power Cup Evo or Diablo Supercorsa?
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 66 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Power Cup Evo or Diablo Supercorsa?
Michelin Power Cup Evo, 67 vs 61 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Power Cup Evo or Diablo Supercorsa?
Michelin Power Cup Evo, 64 vs 53 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology