Tests – · none yet Owners 81 · 6 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Michelin Power GP vs Michelin Anakee 2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 6 + 1 owner reviews. How we score
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
80
Dry
No comparison–Why this score
Source Power GP Anakee 2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 76 (est.) – Reviews found online 86 – Power GP: 60% × 75.7 (est.) + 40% × 86.2 = 80
No road tests of dry for Power GP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
77
Wet
No comparison–Why this score
Source Power GP Anakee 2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 76 (est.) – Reviews found online 80 – Power GP: 60% × 75.7 (est.) + 40% × 79.7 = 77
No road tests of wet for Power GP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
78
Comfort
No comparison–Why this score
Source Power GP Anakee 2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) – Reviews found online 82 – Power GP: 40% × 71.4 (est.) + 60% × 81.7 = 78
No road tests of comfort for Power GP. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
72
Treadwear
No comparison–Why this score
Source Power GP Anakee 2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) – Reviews found online 75 – Power GP: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 72
No road tests of treadwear for Power GP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
85
Handling (owners)
No comparison–Why this score
Source Power GP Anakee 2 Reviews found online 85 –
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Power GP | Michelin Anakee 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 78 | – |
| Dry | 80 | – |
| Wet | 77 | – |
| Comfort | 78 | – |
| Treadwear | 72 | – |
| Handling (owners) | 85 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
78
/ 100
Power GP
–
/ 100
Anakee 2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Power GP
Pros
- Rapid warm-up time providing immediate confidence
- Exceptional dry grip and predictable feedback
- Superior performance in damp or wet conditions compared to competitors
Cons
- Limited tread life, with some users reporting replacement intervals between 5,000 and 6,000 kilometers
- Potential for uneven wear or cupping on the tire edges
- High performance focus may not suit riders prioritizing maximum longevity
Tire B Anakee 2
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Power GP | B · Michelin Anakee 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Which one should you actually buy?
78
/ 100
Michelin Power GP
–
/ 100
Michelin Anakee 2
Only Michelin Power GP has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Tire A · Michelin Power GP
Tire B · Michelin Anakee 2
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology