Tests – · none yet Owners 81 · 6 reviews
Pirelli Dragon Supercorsa Pro looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Michelin Power GP vs Pirelli Dragon Supercorsa Pro — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 6 + 10 owner reviews. How we score
Power GP is ahead, 78–66
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 10 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
80
Dry
Power GP +575Why this score
Source Power GP Dragon Supercorsa Pro Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 76 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 86 78 Power GP: 60% × 75.7 (est.) + 40% × 86.2 = 80
Dragon Supercorsa Pro: 60% × 72.3 (est.) + 40% × 78.1 = 75
No road tests of dry for Power GP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Dragon Supercorsa Pro. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
77
Wet
Power GP +1760Why this score
Source Power GP Dragon Supercorsa Pro Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 76 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 80 56 Power GP: 60% × 75.7 (est.) + 40% × 79.7 = 77
Dragon Supercorsa Pro: 60% × 62.7 (est.) + 40% × 56.2 = 60
No road tests of wet for Power GP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Dragon Supercorsa Pro. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
78
Comfort
Power GP +1167Why this score
Source Power GP Dragon Supercorsa Pro Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 82 67 Power GP: 40% × 71.4 (est.) + 60% × 81.7 = 78
Dragon Supercorsa Pro: 40% × 68.7 (est.) + 60% × 66.7 = 67
No road tests of comfort for Power GP or Dragon Supercorsa Pro. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
72
Treadwear
Power GP +1755Why this score
Source Power GP Dragon Supercorsa Pro Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 75 48 Power GP: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 72
Dragon Supercorsa Pro: 60% × 59.9 (est.) + 40% × 48.1 = 55
No road tests of treadwear for Power GP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Dragon Supercorsa Pro. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
85
Handling (owners)
Power GP +1075Why this score
Source Power GP Dragon Supercorsa Pro Reviews found online 85 75
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Power GP | Pirelli Dragon Supercorsa Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 78 | 66 |
| Dry | 80 | 75 |
| Wet | 77 | 60 |
| Comfort | 78 | 67 |
| Treadwear | 72 | 55 |
| Handling (owners) | 85 | 75 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Power GP
Dragon Supercorsa Pro
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Power GP
Pros
- Rapid warm-up time providing immediate confidence
- Exceptional dry grip and predictable feedback
- Superior performance in damp or wet conditions compared to competitors
Cons
- Limited tread life, with some users reporting replacement intervals between 5,000 and 6,000 kilometers
- Potential for uneven wear or cupping on the tire edges
- High performance focus may not suit riders prioritizing maximum longevity
Tire B Dragon Supercorsa Pro
Pros
- Exceptional dry weather grip and traction
- Precise handling and high-quality front-end feedback
- Quick warm-up time
Cons
- Very short tread life and high wear rates
- Poor performance and lack of confidence in wet conditions
- Not suitable for daily commuting or all-weather riding
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Power GP | B · Pirelli Dragon Supercorsa Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Which one should you actually buy?
Michelin Power GP
Pirelli Dragon Supercorsa Pro
Winner: Michelin Power GP — better wet, treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Power GP rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Pirelli Dragon Supercorsa Pro rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin Power GP scores 77 vs 60 on wet.
Michelin Power GP scores 72 vs 55 on treadwear.
Michelin Power GP scores 78 vs 67 on comfort.
Michelin Power GP scores 85 vs 75 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Power GP or Dragon Supercorsa Pro?
Which is better in the wet, Power GP or Dragon Supercorsa Pro?
Michelin Power GP, 77 vs 60 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Power GP or Dragon Supercorsa Pro?
Michelin Power GP, 80 vs 75 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Power GP or Dragon Supercorsa Pro?
Michelin Power GP, 78 vs 67 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Power GP or Dragon Supercorsa Pro?
Michelin Power GP, 72 vs 55 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology