Tests – · none yet Owners 55 · 7 reviews
Michelin Premier A/S vs Yokohama AVID Ascend GT — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 7 + 24 owner reviews. How we score
AVID Ascend GT is ahead, 69–61
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 24 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
64
Dry
AVID Ascend GT +670Why this score
Source Premier A/S AVID Ascend GT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 63 71 Premier A/S: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 62.5 = 64
AVID Ascend GT: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 70.5 = 70
No road tests of dry for Premier A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for AVID Ascend GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
68
Wet
AVID Ascend GT +573Why this score
Source Premier A/S AVID Ascend GT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 67 74 Premier A/S: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 68
AVID Ascend GT: 60% × 72.4 (est.) + 40% × 73.8 = 73
No road tests of wet for Premier A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for AVID Ascend GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
60
Snow
AVID Ascend GT +565Why this score
Source Premier A/S AVID Ascend GT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 52 60 Premier A/S: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 51.9 = 60
AVID Ascend GT: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 60.4 = 65
No road tests of snow for Premier A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for AVID Ascend GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
61
Comfort
AVID Ascend GT +566Why this score
Source Premier A/S AVID Ascend GT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 58 65 Premier A/S: 40% × 66.5 (est.) + 60% × 57.9 = 61
AVID Ascend GT: 40% × 68 (est.) + 60% × 64.8 = 66
No road tests of comfort for Premier A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for AVID Ascend GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison65Why this score
Source Premier A/S AVID Ascend GT Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online – 64 AVID Ascend GT: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 63.8 = 65
No road tests of noise for AVID Ascend GT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
47
Treadwear
AVID Ascend GT +1966Why this score
Source Premier A/S AVID Ascend GT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 55 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 34 65 Premier A/S: 60% × 55 (est.) + 40% × 34.3 = 47
AVID Ascend GT: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 65.3 = 66
No road tests of treadwear for Premier A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for AVID Ascend GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
60
Handling (owners)
No comparison–Why this score
Source Premier A/S AVID Ascend GT Reviews found online 60 –
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Premier A/S | Yokohama AVID Ascend GT |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 61 | 69 |
| Dry | 64 | 70 |
| Wet | 68 | 73 |
| Snow | 60 | 65 |
| Comfort | 61 | 66 |
| Noise | – | 65 |
| Treadwear | 47 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 60 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Premier A/S
AVID Ascend GT
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Premier A/S
Pros
- Comfortable ride quality with effective bump damping
- Predictable and precise handling in dry conditions
- Good center-line tracking and steering feedback
Cons
- Disappointing tread life and premature wear
- Poor traction and confidence in snow and ice
- Susceptibility to hydroplaning at highway speeds
Tire B AVID Ascend GT
Pros
- Excellent wet-weather performance: several owners describe confident grip, resistance to hydroplaning, and one calls it the best tire for wet roads they have owned.
- Capable in light winter conditions: reviewers report good handling in slush, rain, and snow, with one saying it grips better than any tire they have owned (no reviewer had yet tested deep snow accumulations).
- Comfortable, smooth, and quiet ride: multiple owners cite a noticeable improvement in ride quality and noise over previous or factory tires.
Cons
- Treadwear is an open question: most reviewers have only 1,000–2,500 miles, and one reported front tires worn out after six months while the rears looked new.
- Some road noise reported: one reviewer noted more tread noise on dry pavement and another called the tire a little loud, contrary to the quiet-ride praise elsewhere.
- Ride quality complaints from a minority: one reviewer said the tire drives rough.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Premier A/S | B · Yokohama AVID Ascend GT |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 58 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 12/32″ |
| UTQG | 640 A A | 740 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 65,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Michelin Premier A/S
Yokohama AVID Ascend GT
Winner: Yokohama AVID Ascend GT — better treadwear, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Premier A/S rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Yokohama AVID Ascend GT scores 66 vs 47 on treadwear.
Yokohama AVID Ascend GT scores 70 vs 64 on dry.
Yokohama AVID Ascend GT scores 73 vs 68 on wet.
Yokohama AVID Ascend GT scores 65 vs 60 on snow.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Premier A/S or AVID Ascend GT?
Which is better in the wet, Premier A/S or AVID Ascend GT?
Yokohama AVID Ascend GT, 73 vs 68 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Premier A/S or AVID Ascend GT?
Yokohama AVID Ascend GT, 70 vs 64 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Premier A/S or AVID Ascend GT?
Yokohama AVID Ascend GT, 65 vs 60 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, Premier A/S or AVID Ascend GT?
Yokohama AVID Ascend GT, 66 vs 61 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Premier A/S or AVID Ascend GT?
Yokohama AVID Ascend GT, 66 vs 47 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology