Tests 82 · 10 tests Owners 72 · 39 reviews
Michelin Primacy 4+ vs Nexen N Fera AU5 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Primacy 4+ is ahead, 77–58
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 54 · 6 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
79
Dry
Primacy 4+ +2455Why this score
Source Primacy 4+ N Fera AU5 Professional tests (TWG score) 83 – Reviews found online 73 47 -
76
Wet
Primacy 4+ +2254Why this score
Source Primacy 4+ N Fera AU5 Professional tests (TWG score) 78 – Reviews found online 74 49 -
72
Comfort
Primacy 4+ +765Why this score
Source Primacy 4+ N Fera AU5 Professional tests (TWG score) 72 – Reviews found online 72 62 -
72
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Primacy 4+ N Fera AU5 Professional tests (TWG score) 75 – -
83
Treadwear
Primacy 4+ +1964Why this score
Source Primacy 4+ N Fera AU5 Professional tests (TWG score) 91 – Reviews found online 71 63 -
68
Handling
Primacy 4+ +1355Why this score
Source Primacy 4+ N Fera AU5 Reviews found online 68 55
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Primacy 4+ | Nexen N Fera AU5 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 77 | 58 |
| Dry | 79 | 55 |
| Wet | 76 | 54 |
| Comfort | 72 | 65 |
| Noise | 72 | – |
| Treadwear | 83 | 64 |
| Handling | 68 | 55 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Primacy 4+
N Fera AU5
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Primacy 4+
Pros
- Excellent ride comfort and a smooth, compliant 'limousine-like' feel over bumps
- Strong and reliable grip in both wet and dry conditions, inspiring confidence
- Noticeable improvement in quietness and traction compared to predecessor tires or factory options
Cons
- Loud road noise and a harsh drone on rough or coarse asphalt surfaces
- Soft sidewalls can reduce steering agility and initial responsiveness compared to dedicated sport tires
- High premium price point relative to competitors
Tire B N Fera AU5
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and longevity, lasting multiple years of daily commuting
- Very quiet and comfortable ride quality with smooth highway manners
- Soft sidewalls contribute to high comfort levels even at higher tire pressures
Cons
- Softer sidewalls lead to noticeable flex and reduced responsiveness in hard cornering
- Lower dry grip levels compared to more aggressive performance tires like the Nexen N Fera SU1
- Potential for traction loss or wheel spin during wet weather take-offs, particularly on powerful rear-wheel-drive vehicles
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Primacy 4+ | B · Nexen N Fera AU5 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Michelin Primacy 4+
Nexen N Fera AU5
Winner: Michelin Primacy 4+ — better dry, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Michelin Primacy 4+ scores 79 vs 55 on dry.
Michelin Primacy 4+ scores 76 vs 54 on wet.
Michelin Primacy 4+ scores 83 vs 64 on treadwear.
Michelin Primacy 4+ scores 68 vs 55 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.