Tests 72 · 1 test Owners 54 · 10 reviews
Michelin Primacy MXM4 vs Riken Raptor HR — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 10 + 1 owner reviews. How we score
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
73
Dry
No comparison–Why this score
Source Primacy MXM4 Raptor HR Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 87 – Reviews found online 52 – Primacy MXM4: 60% × 87.2 + 40% × 51.9 = 73
-
57
Wet
No comparison–Why this score
Source Primacy MXM4 Raptor HR Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 56 – Reviews found online 58 – Primacy MXM4: 60% × 56.1 + 40% × 57.5 = 57
-
56
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Primacy MXM4 Raptor HR Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) – Reviews found online 48 – Primacy MXM4: 60% × 62.2 (est.) + 40% × 47.9 = 56
No road tests of snow for Primacy MXM4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
55
Comfort
No comparison–Why this score
Source Primacy MXM4 Raptor HR Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 64 – Reviews found online 48 – Primacy MXM4: 40% × 63.9 + 60% × 48.3 = 55
-
76
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Primacy MXM4 Raptor HR Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 82 – Reviews found online ≈ 67 (est.) – Primacy MXM4: 60% × 81.9 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 76
No owner ratings of noise for Primacy MXM4. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
62
Treadwear
No comparison–Why this score
Source Primacy MXM4 Raptor HR Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) – Reviews found online 59 – Primacy MXM4: 60% × 63.7 (est.) + 40% × 59.3 = 62
No road tests of treadwear for Primacy MXM4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
50
Handling (owners)
No comparison–Why this score
Source Primacy MXM4 Raptor HR Reviews found online 50 – -
55
Efficiency
No comparison–Why this score
Source Primacy MXM4 Raptor HR Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 55 –
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Primacy MXM4 | Riken Raptor HR |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | – |
| Dry | 73 | – |
| Wet | 57 | – |
| Snow | 56 | – |
| Comfort | 55 | – |
| Noise | 76 | – |
| Treadwear | 62 | – |
| Handling (owners) | 50 | – |
| Efficiency | 55 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Primacy MXM4
Raptor HR
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Primacy MXM4
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and vibration dampening
- Strong tread life and durability
- High fuel efficiency
Cons
- Mediocre dry grip and handling precision
- Noticeable understeer when cornering
- Soft sidewalls that lack steering feedback
Tire B Raptor HR
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Primacy MXM4 | B · Riken Raptor HR |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Grand Touring All-Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Michelin Primacy MXM4
Riken Raptor HR
Only Michelin Primacy MXM4 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology