Head-to-head Updated

Michelin X-Ice North 4 vs BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 13 + 0 road tests and 11 + 1,575 owner reviews. How we score

X-Ice North 4 leads, 74–72 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin X-Ice North 4
Tire AMichelin

X-Ice North 4

Winter

± 5

Tests 74 · 13 tests Owners 76 · 11 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2020 Nordic and Studded Winter Tyre Test (ice traction)

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2

All-Terrain T/A KO2

All-Terrain tire

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 1,575 reviews

“I like mine so much I'm on my second set. I got 55k out of my first set (could have got another 10k but started to get a little noisy). Exact tire you have (265/70-17 C load) on a 2018 4Runner.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 77

    Dry

    X-Ice North 4 +4
    73
    Why this score
    SourceX-Ice North 4All-Terrain T/A KO2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 10 / – tests81≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7275

    X-Ice North 4: 60% × 80.9 + 40% × 72 = 77

    All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 73

    No road tests of dry for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 66

    Wet

    All-Terrain T/A KO2 +6
    72
    Why this score
    SourceX-Ice North 4All-Terrain T/A KO2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / – tests59≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7672

    X-Ice North 4: 60% × 58.6 + 40% × 75.9 = 66

    All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 72

    No road tests of wet for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 84

    Snow

    X-Ice North 4 +9
    75
    Why this score
    SourceX-Ice North 4All-Terrain T/A KO2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 11 / – tests87≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online7877

    X-Ice North 4: 60% × 87.2 + 40% × 78.1 = 84

    All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 73.2 (est.) + 40% × 77.2 = 75

    No road tests of snow for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 76

    Comfort

    X-Ice North 4 +6
    70
    Why this score
    SourceX-Ice North 4All-Terrain T/A KO2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / – tests76≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7671

    X-Ice North 4: 40% × 76.1 + 60% × 76.3 = 76

    All-Terrain T/A KO2: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 71 = 70

    No road tests of comfort for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 60

    Noise

    All-Terrain T/A KO2 +9
    69
    Why this score
    SourceX-Ice North 4All-Terrain T/A KO2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 10 / – tests55≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)73

    X-Ice North 4: 60% × 55.4 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 60

    All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 72.5 = 69

    No owner ratings of noise for X-Ice North 4. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

    No road tests of noise for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 74

    Treadwear

    X-Ice North 4 +1
    73
    Why this score
    SourceX-Ice North 4All-Terrain T/A KO2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7977

    X-Ice North 4: 60% × 70.6 (est.) + 40% × 78.8 = 74

    All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 77 = 73

    No road tests of treadwear for X-Ice North 4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 77

    Handling (owners)

    X-Ice North 4 +8
    69
    Why this score
    SourceX-Ice North 4All-Terrain T/A KO2
    Reviews found online7769
  8. 60

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceX-Ice North 4All-Terrain T/A KO2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / – tests60–
Scores at a glance
Michelin X-Ice North 4 vs BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin X-Ice North 4BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2
Relative Score 74 72
Dry 77 73
Wet 66 72
Snow 84 75
Comfort 76 70
Noise 60 69
Treadwear 74 73
Handling (owners) 77 69
Efficiency 60 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

X-Ice North 4

± 7

All-Terrain T/A KO2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryX-Ice North 4All-Terrain T/A KO2ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 95% #6/6 · 2025 NAF Motor Studded Winter Tire Test R17 95% #6/7 · Best All Terrain Tyres Tested On Road, Off Road and Snow [2024] – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 79% #17/18 · 2026 Teknikens Värld Studded, Nordic and Central European Winter Tyre Test 87% #5/7 · Best All Terrain Tyres Tested On Road, Off Road and Snow [2024] – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 92% #7/6 · 2025 NAF Motor Studded Winter Tire Test R17 71% #6/7 · Best All Terrain Tyres Tested On Road, Off Road and Snow [2024] – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 97% #6/8 · 2026 Vi Bilagare Studded Tyre Test 90% #6/7 · Best All Terrain Tyres Tested On Road, Off Road and Snow [2024] – Different tests
Snow Braking Snow 99% #5/6 · 2025 NAF Motor Studded Winter Tire Test R17 100% #1/5 · Best All Terrain Tyres Tested On Road, Off Road and Snow [2024] – Different tests
Snow Handling Snow 99% #2/8 · 2026 Vi Bilagare Studded Tyre Test 100% #1/5 · Best All Terrain Tyres Tested On Road, Off Road and Snow [2024] – Different tests
Snow Traction Snow 100% #1/8 · 2026 Vi Bilagare Studded Tyre Test 96% #3/5 · Best All Terrain Tyres Tested On Road, Off Road and Snow [2024] – Different tests
Noise Noise 98% #3/8 · 2026 Vi Bilagare Studded Tyre Test 96% #6/7 · Best All Terrain Tyres Tested On Road, Off Road and Snow [2024] – Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 96% #6/6 · 2025 NAF Motor Studded Winter Tire Test R17 75% #7/7 · Best All Terrain Tyres Tested On Road, Off Road and Snow [2024] – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #3/6 2027 NAF Motor Studded Winter Tire Test R17 #6/5 2025 Wybór Kierowców Off Road Tire Test R18 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A X-Ice North 4

Pros

  • Outstanding grip and traction on ice and snow
  • Significantly lower road noise compared to competing studded tires
  • Comfortable ride quality

Cons

  • Premature stud loss reported by some users over multiple seasons
  • Slightly slippery feel on rain and dry concrete
  • Light studs can struggle to penetrate loose snow sitting on top of hard ice
All owner themes in the X-Ice North 4 review

Tire B All-Terrain T/A KO2

Pros

  • Exceptional off-road traction and puncture resistance on rocks, gravel, and dirt
  • Aggressive, rugged aesthetics that enhance the look of trucks and SUVs
  • Impressive tread longevity and high mileage capabilities

Cons

  • Reduced grip and slippery performance in wet conditions, rain, and standing water
  • Rubber tends to harden over time, negatively impacting cold-weather and ice traction
  • Higher price point compared to some competitors
All owner themes in the All-Terrain T/A KO2 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Michelin X-Ice North 4

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2

Positive

Community sentiment toward the BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 is largely positive, with drivers frequently praising its aggressive styling, tough sidewalls, off-road durability, and solid general performance. Many owners report capable handling in snow, though several emphasize that it cannot replace a dedicated winter tire and can struggle on ice or packed snow. Criticisms center on high pricing, added weight hurting fuel economy, mud packing, occasional tread chunking, and difficulties with balancing causing highway vibrations.

4runner6g.com ·2026-05-08

“I ran the stock AT3’s on TH for about 5k miles with no issues. They were quiet and handled sand, small/medium rock gardens and steps fine - though I was pretty concerned about punctures in the rocks. They were excellent in rain and surprisingly good in light snow which is pretty rare here in TX. I switched to 285/75/17 AT3’s because I wanted more rubber and contact when airing down. I’ve never run the AT4’s so I can’t speak to their capabilities. I’ve run BFG KO2’s, KO3’s and MT’s on other vehicles and they are excellent off road. The KO2’s and MT’s were not great in rain, but you learned how to deal with them. The KO3 is superior to the AT3 off road IMO. The downside being it’s hard to find load ranges other than E. That was one of the reasons I stayed with AT3’s when I went to a larger tire. I could get it in load range C, I was confident it could handle the off road conditions I would use them in, and they were excellent on road. The majority of my use is on road so I tried to be realistic and factor that in to the selection - not that I don’t look at a set of 35” R/T Pro’s and think “I Want That”.”

jeeprenegadeforum.com ·2018-03-03

“FWIW, I had the same 18s that you have and went to a 16" Vision Cross wheel and wrapped them in 225/70 KO2s. I weighed the stock wheels and the new wheels and the new set is only 2 pounds heavier than stock at most. I don't notice much acceleration loss, but I really don't beat on my jeep either. I did notice a little "hum" once I'm going 30mph but it's nothing annoying at all and I don't even hear it anymore. I have also carefully measured MPGs with both set ups and I have not lost anything. This is calculated MPG, not just what the computer says and I do add an additional 2.5% due to the increase in tire circumference. My avg is 25.1 (25.73 when adding the 2.5%) and my commute is 75% hwy and 25% local. I was afraid to get the KO2s because of added weight, tire noise and mpg loss, but I was afraid for nothing. Just my 2 cents, but I remember reading most people talk about how bad things would be with these tires. I'm glad I listened to those who said mpg loss would be minimal at most. Mike”

fordtremor.com ·3 upvotes ·2024-09-04

“I’ve got KO2s on a 4Runner currently, and have ran 10 other sets in the past. Installed these KO3s on a GMC Sierra 1500 a couple months ago, and I’m up to 12K miles on them so far and adding another 3K miles to that this week. Also running Mickey Thomson Baja Boss ATs on my Tremor currently with about 12K on them as well. I’ve been thoroughly impressed with the KO2s durability, overall wear, and mileage on lighter vehicles such as half tons and the 4Runner. I haven’t been happy with them on HD trucks though. Traction isn’t as good on heavy vehicles off pavement, and mileage sucks. So far the KO3 has better wet pavement traction, so the same great traction off road on a lighter truck, and seems to be even quieter. We’ll see what I think I’m another 60K miles. I have yet to get less than 80K on a set of KO2s on a half ton, so I’m hoping the KO3 will do the same. The Mickeys have been a great tire for now. I’m not sure how well they’ll wear though. It seems to be noticeable tire wear already at 12K miles. However wet weather traction and snow has been fantastic. Minimal noise for a tire this aggressive. I’m just not convinced I’ll make it past 40K miles with them.”

Top themes
#aggressive look#winter and snow traction#sidewall durability#balancing and vibrations#road noise levels#fuel economy impact#tread wear life

Based on 395 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin X-Ice North 4 B · BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2
CategoryWinterAll-Terrain tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available—49
Rim diameters—15″ – 20″
Tread depth—13 - 15/32″
Treadwear warranty—50,000 mi
Sidewall—Black Side Wall - Raised White Lettering
Max pressure—35 - 80 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin X-Ice North 4

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2

Narrow edge: Michelin X-Ice North 4 — better snow, handling and comfort. Pick the BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 if noise and wet matter most to you.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Michelin X-Ice North 4 scores 84 vs 75 on snow.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 scores 69 vs 60 on noise.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin X-Ice North 4 scores 77 vs 69 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin X-Ice North 4 scores 76 vs 70 on comfort.

Tire A · Michelin X-Ice North 4
Tire B · BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

X-Ice North 4 or All-Terrain T/A KO2?

Which is better in the wet, X-Ice North 4 or All-Terrain T/A KO2?

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 72 vs 66 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, X-Ice North 4 or All-Terrain T/A KO2?

Michelin X-Ice North 4, 77 vs 73 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, X-Ice North 4 or All-Terrain T/A KO2?

Michelin X-Ice North 4, 84 vs 75 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, X-Ice North 4 or All-Terrain T/A KO2?

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 69 vs 60 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, X-Ice North 4 or All-Terrain T/A KO2?

Michelin X-Ice North 4, 76 vs 70 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, X-Ice North 4 or All-Terrain T/A KO2?

Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 73 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology