Tests 67 · 1 test Owners – · none yet
Michelin X Ice Snow+ vs Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 2 road tests and 0 + 20 owner reviews. How we score
Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV is ahead, 76–67
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 72 · 2 tests Owners 82 · 20 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2025 Friction Winter Tyre Test (wet braking)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
62
Dry
Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV +1274Why this score
Source X Ice Snow+ Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 2 tests 61 74 Reviews found online ≈ 65 (est.) 74 X Ice Snow+: 60% × 60.7 + 40% × 64.9 (est.) = 62
Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV: 60% × 73.7 + 40% × 74.4 = 74
No owner ratings of dry for X Ice Snow+. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
71
Wet
Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV +576Why this score
Source X Ice Snow+ Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 2 tests 71 69 Reviews found online ≈ 71 (est.) 87 X Ice Snow+: 60% × 71 + 40% × 70.9 (est.) = 71
Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV: 60% × 68.5 + 40% × 86.7 = 76
No owner ratings of wet for X Ice Snow+. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
69
Snow
Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV +1079Why this score
Source X Ice Snow+ Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 2 tests 68 75 Reviews found online ≈ 70 (est.) 85 X Ice Snow+: 60% × 67.7 + 40% × 69.7 (est.) = 69
Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV: 60% × 74.8 + 40% × 85.1 = 79
No owner ratings of snow for X Ice Snow+. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
70
Comfort
Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV +777Why this score
Source X Ice Snow+ Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 70 ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online ≈ 69 (est.) 81 X Ice Snow+: 40% × 70.3 + 60% × 69.1 (est.) = 70
Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV: 40% × 71.3 (est.) + 60% × 81.4 = 77
No owner ratings of comfort for X Ice Snow+. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
65
Noise
Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV +873Why this score
Source X Ice Snow+ Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 2 tests 65 66 Reviews found online ≈ 66 (est.) 84 X Ice Snow+: 60% × 64.6 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 65
Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV: 60% × 65.7 + 40% × 84.4 = 73
No owner ratings of noise for X Ice Snow+. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
–
Treadwear
No comparison75Why this score
Source X Ice Snow+ Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online – 80 Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV: 60% × 71.2 (est.) + 40% × 79.6 = 75
No road tests of treadwear for Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison81Why this score
Source X Ice Snow+ Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV Reviews found online – 81 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison72Why this score
Source X Ice Snow+ Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests – 72
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin X Ice Snow+ | Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 76 |
| Dry | 62 | 74 |
| Wet | 71 | 76 |
| Snow | 69 | 79 |
| Comfort | 70 | 77 |
| Noise | 65 | 73 |
| Treadwear | – | 75 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 81 |
| Efficiency | – | 72 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
X Ice Snow+
Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | X Ice Snow+ | Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 93% #3/3 · 2026 Tire Rack New Winter Tyre Test | 96% #5/8 · 2025 Friction Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 100% #1/3 · 2026 Tire Rack New Winter Tyre Test | 100% #1/8 · 2025 Friction Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Ice Traction | Snow | 100% #1/3 · 2026 Tire Rack New Winter Tyre Test | 100% #1/8 · 2025 Friction Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 96% #3/3 · 2026 Tire Rack New Winter Tyre Test | 99% #4/8 · 2025 Friction Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #3/3 2026 Tire Rack New Winter Tyre Test | #4/6 2027 NAF Motor Studless Winter Tire Test R17 | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A X Ice Snow+
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV
Pros
- Exceptional grip and traction on snow and ice
- Significantly quieter than previous models and studded alternatives
- Stable and predictable handling with a firm, confident ride on dry and wet pavement
Cons
- Higher price point compared to some other tire options
- Slightly firmer ride compared to softer alternatives like Bridgestone Blizzaks
- Some minor compromises in ultimate dry and wet grip typical of soft-compound winter tires
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin X Ice Snow+ | B · Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | — | 70 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 12/32″ |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | — | 47 - 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Michelin X Ice Snow+
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV
Winner: Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV — better dry, snow and noise. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin X Ice Snow+ rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 0 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV scores 74 vs 62 on dry.
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV scores 79 vs 69 on snow.
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV scores 73 vs 65 on noise.
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV scores 77 vs 70 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
X Ice Snow+ or Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV?
Which is better in the wet, X Ice Snow+ or Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV?
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV, 76 vs 71 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, X Ice Snow+ or Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV?
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV, 74 vs 62 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, X Ice Snow+ or Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV?
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV, 79 vs 69 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, X Ice Snow+ or Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV?
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV, 73 vs 65 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, X Ice Snow+ or Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV?
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV, 77 vs 70 on our comfort score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology