Head-to-head Updated

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV vs Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 2 road tests and 21 + 20 owner reviews. How we score

Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV is ahead, 76–71

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV
± 7

Tests 70 · 2 tests Owners 74 · 21 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 8 in The BEST Studded Tyres for 2025 (snow handling)

Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV
± 6

Tests 72 · 2 tests Owners 82 · 20 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2025 Friction Winter Tyre Test (wet braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV +6
    74
    Why this score
    SourceHakkapeliitta 10 SUVHakkapeliitta R5 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 2 tests7074
    Reviews found online6774

    Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV: 60% × 69.6 + 40% × 66.8 = 68

    Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV: 60% × 73.7 + 40% × 74.4 = 74

  2. 69

    Wet

    Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV +7
    76
    Why this score
    SourceHakkapeliitta 10 SUVHakkapeliitta R5 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 2 tests6369
    Reviews found online7987

    Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV: 60% × 62.6 + 40% × 79.1 = 69

    Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV: 60% × 68.5 + 40% × 86.7 = 76

  3. 81

    Snow

    Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV +2
    79
    Why this score
    SourceHakkapeliitta 10 SUVHakkapeliitta R5 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 2 tests8175
    Reviews found online8285

    Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV: 60% × 81 + 40% × 81.9 = 81

    Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV: 60% × 74.8 + 40% × 85.1 = 79

  4. 71

    Comfort

    Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV +6
    77
    Why this score
    SourceHakkapeliitta 10 SUVHakkapeliitta R5 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7281

    Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV: 40% × 69.3 (est.) + 60% × 71.5 = 71

    Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV: 40% × 71.3 (est.) + 60% × 81.4 = 77

    No road tests of comfort for Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 60

    Noise

    Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV +13
    73
    Why this score
    SourceHakkapeliitta 10 SUVHakkapeliitta R5 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 2 tests6266
    Reviews found online5784

    Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV: 60% × 61.7 + 40% × 56.7 = 60

    Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV: 60% × 65.7 + 40% × 84.4 = 73

  6. 73

    Treadwear

    Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV +2
    75
    Why this score
    SourceHakkapeliitta 10 SUVHakkapeliitta R5 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7880

    Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV: 60% × 70.6 (est.) + 40% × 77.8 = 73

    Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV: 60% × 71.2 (est.) + 40% × 79.6 = 75

    No road tests of treadwear for Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 67

    Handling (owners)

    Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV +14
    81
    Why this score
    SourceHakkapeliitta 10 SUVHakkapeliitta R5 SUV
    Reviews found online6781
  8. 74

    Efficiency

    Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV +2
    72
    Why this score
    SourceHakkapeliitta 10 SUVHakkapeliitta R5 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 2 tests7472
Scores at a glance
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV vs Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryNokian Hakkapeliitta 10 SUVNokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV
Relative Score 71 76
Dry 68 74
Wet 69 76
Snow 81 79
Comfort 71 77
Noise 60 73
Treadwear 73 75
Handling (owners) 67 81
Efficiency 74 72

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV

± 6

Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryHakkapeliitta 10 SUVHakkapeliitta R5 SUVΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 95% #4/8 · 2022 Studded Winter Tyre Test 96% #5/8 · 2025 Friction Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Dry Handling (tester's mark) Dry 80% #4/8 · The BEST Studded Tyres for 2025 60% #6/8 · 2025 Friction Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 92% #8/8 · The BEST Studded Tyres for 2025 94% #4/8 · 2025 Friction Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 87% #7/8 · The BEST Studded Tyres for 2025 100% #1/8 · 2025 Friction Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 99% #5/8 · The BEST Studded Tyres for 2025 98% #3/8 · 2025 Friction Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Ice Handling Snow 100% #1/8 · The BEST Studded Tyres for 2025 95% #6/8 · 2025 Friction Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Ice Traction Snow 100% #1/8 · The BEST Studded Tyres for 2025 100% #1/8 · 2025 Friction Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Snow Handling Snow 100% #1/8 · The BEST Studded Tyres for 2025 99% #4/8 · 2025 Friction Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Snow Traction Snow 99% #3/8 · The BEST Studded Tyres for 2025 99% #6/8 · 2025 Friction Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Noise Noise 97% #5/8 · The BEST Studded Tyres for 2025 99% #5/8 · 2025 Friction Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Fuel Consumption Efficiency 97% #3/8 · The BEST Studded Tyres for 2025 98% #5/8 · 2025 Friction Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 69% #7/8 · 2022 Studded Winter Tyre Test 65% #7/8 · 2022 ViBilagare Nordic SUV Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall #1/8 The BEST Studded Tyres for 2025 #4/6 2027 NAF Motor Studless Winter Tire Test R17 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and grip on ice and hard-packed snow
  • Short braking distances and reliable stopping power in winter conditions
  • Drivability and control restored in extreme mountainous or northern winter climates

Cons

  • Increased cabin noise due to the metal studs
  • Squirmy feel and sidewall flex on dry pavement
  • Reduction in fuel economy
All owner themes in the Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV review

Tire B Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and traction on snow and ice
  • Significantly quieter than previous models and studded alternatives
  • Stable and predictable handling with a firm, confident ride on dry and wet pavement

Cons

  • Higher price point compared to some other tire options
  • Slightly firmer ride compared to softer alternatives like Bridgestone Blizzaks
  • Some minor compromises in ultimate dry and wet grip typical of soft-compound winter tires
All owner themes in the Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV B · Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available4970
Rim diameters16″ – 22″16″ – 22″
Tread depth12/32″12/32″
SidewallBlackwallBlack Side Wall
Max pressure51 psi47 - 51 psi
Sizes in common4747

Which one should you actually buy?

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV

Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV

Winner: Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV — better handling, noise and wet. Where the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV scores 81 vs 67 on handling.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV scores 73 vs 60 on noise.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV scores 76 vs 69 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV scores 74 vs 68 on dry.

Tire A · Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV
Tire B · Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV or Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV?

Which is better in the wet, Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV or Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV?

Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV, 76 vs 69 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV or Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV?

Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV, 74 vs 68 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV or Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV?

Neither, by our numbers: 81 vs 79 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV or Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV?

Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV, 73 vs 60 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV or Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV?

Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV, 77 vs 71 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV or Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV?

Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 75 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

Which rolls more easily, Hakkapeliitta 10 SUV or Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV?

Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 72 on the efficiency score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology