Tests 70 · 13 tests Owners 78 · 20 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2025 Studded, Friction and European Winter Tyre Test (comfort (tester's mark))
Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 13 + 0 road tests and 20 + 11 owner reviews. How we score
X Ice Snow leads, 73–70 Narrow edge
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 70 · 13 tests Owners 78 · 20 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2025 Studded, Friction and European Winter Tyre Test (comfort (tester's mark))
Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 11 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | X Ice Snow | iceGUARD iG51v |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 11 / – tests | 65 | ≈ 69 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 71 | 71 |
X Ice Snow: 60% × 64.9 + 40% × 70.7 = 67
iceGUARD iG51v: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.2 = 70
No road tests of dry for iceGUARD iG51v. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
| Source | X Ice Snow | iceGUARD iG51v |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / – tests | 65 | ≈ 76 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 79 | 80 |
X Ice Snow: 60% × 64.9 + 40% × 79.2 = 71
iceGUARD iG51v: 60% × 75.6 (est.) + 40% × 79.6 = 77
No road tests of wet for iceGUARD iG51v. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | X Ice Snow | iceGUARD iG51v |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / – tests | 73 | ≈ 72 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 81 | 76 |
X Ice Snow: 60% × 73.2 + 40% × 81.2 = 76
iceGUARD iG51v: 60% × 72.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.8 = 74
No road tests of snow for iceGUARD iG51v. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
| Source | X Ice Snow | iceGUARD iG51v |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests | 81 | ≈ 69 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 79 | 69 |
X Ice Snow: 40% × 80.8 + 60% × 78.7 = 80
iceGUARD iG51v: 40% × 68.7 (est.) + 60% × 68.8 = 69
No road tests of comfort for iceGUARD iG51v. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
| Source | X Ice Snow | iceGUARD iG51v |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / – tests | 80 | ≈ 66 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 66 (est.) | 57 |
X Ice Snow: 60% × 80.2 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 75
iceGUARD iG51v: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 57.4 = 63
No owner ratings of noise for X Ice Snow. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
No road tests of noise for iceGUARD iG51v. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | X Ice Snow | iceGUARD iG51v |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 72 (est.) | ≈ 60 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 81 | 49 |
X Ice Snow: 60% × 71.8 (est.) + 40% × 81.4 = 76
iceGUARD iG51v: 60% × 60.3 (est.) + 40% × 49 = 56
No road tests of treadwear for X Ice Snow. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for iceGUARD iG51v. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | X Ice Snow | iceGUARD iG51v |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 74 | – |
| Source | X Ice Snow | iceGUARD iG51v |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests | 77 | – |
| Category | Michelin X Ice Snow | Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 70 |
| Dry | 67 | 70 |
| Wet | 71 | 77 |
| Snow | 76 | 74 |
| Comfort | 80 | 69 |
| Noise | 75 | 63 |
| Treadwear | 76 | 56 |
| Handling (owners) | 74 | – |
| Efficiency | 77 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
X Ice Snow
iceGUARD iG51v
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
| Attribute | A · Michelin X Ice Snow | B · Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | Premium Touring Winter tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 100 | 2 |
| Rim diameters | 13″ – 21″ | 18″ |
| Tread depth | — | 13/32″ |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Michelin X Ice Snow
Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v
Narrow edge: Michelin X Ice Snow — better treadwear, noise and comfort. Pick the Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v if wet and dry matter most to you. Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin X Ice Snow scores 76 vs 56 on treadwear.
Michelin X Ice Snow scores 75 vs 63 on noise.
Michelin X Ice Snow scores 80 vs 69 on comfort.
Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v scores 77 vs 71 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v, 77 vs 71 on our wet score.
Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v, 70 vs 67 on our dry score.
Neither, by our numbers: 76 vs 74 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Michelin X Ice Snow, 75 vs 63 on our noise score.
Michelin X Ice Snow, 80 vs 69 on our comfort score.
Michelin X Ice Snow, 76 vs 56 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology