Tests – · none yet Owners 80 · 22 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Milestar Patagonia A/T Pro vs Falken WildPeak A/T4W — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 22 + 1,062 owner reviews. How we score
WildPeak A/T4W leads, 78–76 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 75 · 1 test Owners 84 · 1,062 reviews
Best test result: #3 of 30 in 2026 Tire Rack All Terrain Tyre Snow Test (snow handling (tester's mark))
“New Wildpeak A/T4Ws Added some Wildpeak AT4s in 275/60r20 on my stock suspension ‘24 STX. Replaced the chrome lugs with black Gorillas and added rear well liners. Looks so much better than the OEM Hankooks.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
76
Dry
WildPeak A/T4W +480Why this score
Source Patagonia A/T Pro WildPeak A/T4W Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 73 (est.) 76 Reviews found online 80 87 Patagonia A/T Pro: 60% × 73 (est.) + 40% × 80.3 = 76
WildPeak A/T4W: 60% × 76.1 + 40% × 87.1 = 80
No road tests of dry for Patagonia A/T Pro. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
80
Wet
Level80Why this score
Source Patagonia A/T Pro WildPeak A/T4W Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 78 (est.) 77 Reviews found online 84 86 Patagonia A/T Pro: 60% × 77.7 (est.) + 40% × 83.5 = 80
WildPeak A/T4W: 60% × 76.5 + 40% × 86.4 = 80
No road tests of wet for Patagonia A/T Pro. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
74
Snow
Patagonia A/T Pro +173Why this score
Source Patagonia A/T Pro WildPeak A/T4W Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 72 (est.) 72 Reviews found online 77 76 Patagonia A/T Pro: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 76.8 = 74
WildPeak A/T4W: 60% × 71.7 + 40% × 75.7 = 73
No road tests of snow for Patagonia A/T Pro. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
76
Comfort
Patagonia A/T Pro +175Why this score
Source Patagonia A/T Pro WildPeak A/T4W Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 71 (est.) 71 Reviews found online 80 78 Patagonia A/T Pro: 40% × 71 (est.) + 60% × 79.7 = 76
WildPeak A/T4W: 40% × 70.8 + 60% × 77.6 = 75
No road tests of comfort for Patagonia A/T Pro. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
67
Noise
WildPeak A/T4W +774Why this score
Source Patagonia A/T Pro WildPeak A/T4W Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 72 Reviews found online 68 77 Patagonia A/T Pro: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 68.2 = 67
WildPeak A/T4W: 60% × 71.7 + 40% × 77.3 = 74
No road tests of noise for Patagonia A/T Pro. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
76
Treadwear
WildPeak A/T4W +480Why this score
Source Patagonia A/T Pro WildPeak A/T4W Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 74 (est.) Reviews found online 81 89 Patagonia A/T Pro: 60% × 71.7 (est.) + 40% × 81.4 = 76
WildPeak A/T4W: 60% × 74.4 (est.) + 40% × 89 = 80
No road tests of treadwear for Patagonia A/T Pro. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for WildPeak A/T4W. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
78
Handling (owners)
Patagonia A/T Pro +375Why this score
Source Patagonia A/T Pro WildPeak A/T4W Reviews found online 78 75
Scores at a glance
| Category | Milestar Patagonia A/T Pro | Falken WildPeak A/T4W |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 76 | 78 |
| Dry | 76 | 80 |
| Wet | 80 | 80 |
| Snow | 74 | 73 |
| Comfort | 76 | 75 |
| Noise | 67 | 74 |
| Treadwear | 76 | 80 |
| Handling (owners) | 78 | 75 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
76
/ 100
Patagonia A/T Pro
78
/ 100
WildPeak A/T4W
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Patagonia A/T Pro
Pros
- Excellent traction in diverse weather conditions including rain, mud, and snow
- Low road noise on the highway compared to typical aggressive all-terrain tires
- Aggressive and attractive tread aesthetics
Cons
- Some slight increase in road noise compared to standard highway street tires
- Requires regular rotation every 10,000 miles to prevent uneven wear and potential noise increases
Tire B WildPeak A/T4W
Pros
- Remarkably quiet and smooth on-road performance for an aggressive all-terrain tire
- Exceptional traction across diverse surfaces including dirt, gravel, mud, and snow
- Robust sidewall durability and longevity with minimal tread wear reported over thousands of miles
Cons
- Noticeable reduction in fuel economy due to the heavier tire weight
- Occasional difficulty with high-speed balancing and vibrations
- Some mixed feedback regarding grip on wet pavement or hard-packed ice
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Milestar Patagonia A/T Pro
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Falken WildPeak A/T4W
Community sentiment toward the Falken Wildpeak A/T4W is largely positive, with owners praising its aggressive aesthetics, quiet highway ride, and reliable traction in wet and snowy conditions. Most discussions focus on fitment clearance and upsized setups, with very little to no rubbing reported across multiple platforms. The primary critique and discussion point centers on its noticeable tire weight, associated MPG penalties, and confusing load-rating weight discrepancies.
f150tremor.com
·2024-01-22
“It doesn't make sense to me either. Their 285/75R18 tire at 10 ply, HD sidewall and 1" taller than the C load is lighter. The guy in the video mentions the discrepancies in info on weights, but said they weighed in at 68.8lbs per his home scale for the 285/70R18 C load.”
r/nissanfrontier
·4 upvotes ·2024-04-03
“Anyone running Falken Wildpeak A/T4Ws on their truck yet? I have a 21 Nissan Frontier SV (Midnight Edition) with 2" lift (Koni 82 shocks and ADO Parabolic Leaf spring in rear). I currently have stock Hankook Dynapro HT (RH12) 265/60R18 tires that need to be replaced. I just ordered a set of Falken Wildpeak A/T4W tire size 265/65R18 to replace them. My understanding is 265/65R18 (31.6") should fit without any rubbing or modifications since that is the equivilant size tire that is installed on the Pro-4x model. I know I probably could have went a little larger but wanted to leave things as close to stock as possible. I had Falken Wildpeak A/T3W on my other truck and liked them. Anyone else have Falken Wildpeak A/T4W on their truck? How do you like them? Also - What should I do about my spare tire? It is currently 265/70R16. I assume I should upsize this to match (265/75R16)?”
r/ToyotaTundra
·46 upvotes ·2024-09-06
“New shoes! Wildpeak A/T4W Coming off of the stock LTX AT2s & upsizing to 285/70r18. These are dope! Was scared to try 295’s since most of the 295’s that fit well are RG’s and the A/T3W’s.”
Top themes
#tire weight and mpg impact#low road noise#fitment and rubbing clearance#wet and snow traction#aggressive sidewall aesthetics#ply construction and durability#comparison to A/T3W
Based on 41 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Milestar Patagonia A/T Pro | B · Falken WildPeak A/T4W |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 45 | 64 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 14 - 18/32″ | 13/32″ |
| UTQG | 660 A A | 660 B B |
| Treadwear warranty | 55,000 mi | 65,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 47 - 80 psi | 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 44 | 44 |
Which one should you actually buy?
76
/ 100
Milestar Patagonia A/T Pro
78
/ 100
Falken WildPeak A/T4W
Narrow edge: Falken WildPeak A/T4W — better noise, dry and treadwear. Where the Milestar Patagonia A/T Pro is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Falken WildPeak A/T4W scores 74 vs 67 on noise.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Falken WildPeak A/T4W scores 80 vs 76 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Falken WildPeak A/T4W scores 80 vs 76 on treadwear.
Tire A · Milestar Patagonia A/T Pro
Tire B · Falken WildPeak A/T4W
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Patagonia A/T Pro or WildPeak A/T4W?
Which is better in the wet, Patagonia A/T Pro or WildPeak A/T4W?
Neither, by our numbers: 80 vs 80 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Patagonia A/T Pro or WildPeak A/T4W?
Falken WildPeak A/T4W, 80 vs 76 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Patagonia A/T Pro or WildPeak A/T4W?
Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 73 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, Patagonia A/T Pro or WildPeak A/T4W?
Falken WildPeak A/T4W, 74 vs 67 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Patagonia A/T Pro or WildPeak A/T4W?
Neither, by our numbers: 76 vs 75 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Patagonia A/T Pro or WildPeak A/T4W?
Falken WildPeak A/T4W, 80 vs 76 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology