tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Milestar Patagonia A/T Pro vs Nokian Outpost nAT — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 22 + 37 owner reviews. How we score

Patagonia A/T Pro is ahead, 76–71

Check price on Amazon · Patagonia A/T Pro or Outpost nAT on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Nokian Outpost nAT
Tire BNokian

Outpost nAT

All Season

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 37 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 76

    Dry

    Patagonia A/T Pro +5
    71
    Why this score
    SourcePatagonia A/T ProOutpost nAT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online8072

    Patagonia A/T Pro: 60% × 73 (est.) + 40% × 80.2 = 76

    Outpost nAT: 60% × 69.6 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 71

    No road tests of dry for Patagonia A/T Pro. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Outpost nAT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 80

    Wet

    Patagonia A/T Pro +6
    74
    Why this score
    SourcePatagonia A/T ProOutpost nAT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 78 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online8375

    Patagonia A/T Pro: 60% × 77.6 (est.) + 40% × 83.4 = 80

    Outpost nAT: 60% × 72.9 (est.) + 40% × 74.8 = 74

    No road tests of wet for Patagonia A/T Pro. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Outpost nAT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 74

    Snow

    Patagonia A/T Pro +3
    71
    Why this score
    SourcePatagonia A/T ProOutpost nAT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7771

    Patagonia A/T Pro: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 76.8 = 74

    Outpost nAT: 60% × 70.8 (est.) + 40% × 71.3 = 71

    No road tests of snow for Patagonia A/T Pro. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Outpost nAT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 76

    Comfort

    Patagonia A/T Pro +9
    67
    Why this score
    SourcePatagonia A/T ProOutpost nAT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7966

    Patagonia A/T Pro: 40% × 70.8 (est.) + 60% × 79.3 = 76

    Outpost nAT: 40% × 68 (est.) + 60% × 65.6 = 67

    No road tests of comfort for Patagonia A/T Pro. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Outpost nAT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 67

    Noise

    Patagonia A/T Pro +5
    62
    Why this score
    SourcePatagonia A/T ProOutpost nAT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6856

    Patagonia A/T Pro: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.3 = 67

    Outpost nAT: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 56.3 = 62

    No road tests of noise for Patagonia A/T Pro or Outpost nAT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 76

    Treadwear

    Patagonia A/T Pro +5
    71
    Why this score
    SourcePatagonia A/T ProOutpost nAT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online8174

    Patagonia A/T Pro: 60% × 71.9 (est.) + 40% × 81.3 = 76

    Outpost nAT: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 74 = 71

    No road tests of treadwear for Patagonia A/T Pro. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Outpost nAT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 78

    Handling (owners)

    Patagonia A/T Pro +9
    69
    Why this score
    SourcePatagonia A/T ProOutpost nAT
    Reviews found online7869
Scores at a glance
CategoryMilestar Patagonia A/T ProNokian Outpost nAT
Relative Score 76 71
Dry 76 71
Wet 80 74
Snow 74 71
Comfort 76 67
Noise 67 62
Treadwear 76 71
Handling (owners) 78 69

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Patagonia A/T Pro

± 7

Outpost nAT

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Patagonia A/T Pro

Pros

  • Excellent all-weather traction, performing exceptionally well in rain, mud, and snow
  • Surprising low road noise despite the aggressive all-terrain tread pattern
  • Great value and affordability compared to higher-priced competitor tires

Cons

  • Slightly noisier than standard street tires, as expected from an aggressive tread
  • Some users noted the need for regular rotations (e.g., every 10,000 miles) to prevent uneven wear and manage noise
  • Limited long-term mileage data from newer users who haven't accumulated high mileage yet
All owner themes in the Patagonia A/T Pro review

Tire B Outpost nAT

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and confidence in deep snow, ice, and severe winter conditions
  • Strong wet and dry pavement traction with a firm, planted feel
  • Durable construction capable of handling rugged off-road terrain, gravel, and shale

Cons

  • Some drivers report noticeable tread noise, humming, or droning at highway speeds
  • Stiffer ride quality, particularly with LT-metric or heavier load-rated variants
  • Tread pattern tends to pick up and hold small to medium-sized stones
All owner themes in the Outpost nAT review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Milestar Patagonia A/T Pro B · Nokian Outpost nAT
CategoryAll-Terrain tireAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available4547
Rim diameters15″ – 22″15″ – 22″
Tread depth14 - 18/32″14/32″
UTQG660 A A700 A A
Treadwear warranty55,000 mi60,000 mi
SidewallBlack Side WallBlackwall
Max pressure47 - 80 psi51 psi
Sizes in common3939

Which one should you actually buy?

Milestar Patagonia A/T Pro

Nokian Outpost nAT

Winner: Milestar Patagonia A/T Pro — better comfort, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Milestar Patagonia A/T Pro scores 76 vs 67 on comfort.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Milestar Patagonia A/T Pro scores 78 vs 69 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Milestar Patagonia A/T Pro scores 80 vs 74 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Milestar Patagonia A/T Pro scores 76 vs 71 on dry.

Tire A · Milestar Patagonia A/T Pro
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Nokian Outpost nAT
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Patagonia A/T Pro or Outpost nAT?

Which is better in the wet, Patagonia A/T Pro or Outpost nAT?

Milestar Patagonia A/T Pro, 80 vs 74 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Patagonia A/T Pro or Outpost nAT?

Milestar Patagonia A/T Pro, 76 vs 71 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Patagonia A/T Pro or Outpost nAT?

Milestar Patagonia A/T Pro, 74 vs 71 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Patagonia A/T Pro or Outpost nAT?

Milestar Patagonia A/T Pro, 67 vs 62 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Patagonia A/T Pro or Outpost nAT?

Milestar Patagonia A/T Pro, 76 vs 67 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Patagonia A/T Pro or Outpost nAT?

Milestar Patagonia A/T Pro, 76 vs 71 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology